backtop


Print 65 comment(s) - last by johnsonx.. on Jan 7 at 7:37 PM


Dave Heiner  (Source: blogs.technet.com)
Microsoft said FTC isn't doing enough to force Google to conform with antitrust laws

A Microsoft executive has called Google out on the fact that Windows Phone users cannot enjoy a full YouTube experience the way Android and iOS users can.

Dave Heiner, Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Microsoft, wrote a post about the fact that the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is not doing enough to force Google to conform with antitrust laws. More specifically, Microsoft is upset that Windows Phone still cannot get a full YouTube app while the competition (Android and iOS) are able.

"Despite government scrutiny, Google continues to block Microsoft from offering its customers proper access to YouTube," said Heiner. "This is an important issue because consumers value YouTube access on their phone: YouTube apps on the Android and Apple platforms were two of the most downloaded mobile applications in 2012, according to recent news reports. Yet Google still refuses to allow Windows Phone users to have the same access to YouTube that Android and Apple customers enjoy. Microsoft has continued to engage with YouTube personnel over the past two years to remedy this problem for consumers.

"As you might expect, it appears that YouTube itself would like all customers – on Windows Phone as on any other device – to have a great YouTube experience. But just last month we learned from YouTube that senior executives at Google told them not to enable a first-class YouTube experience on Windows Phones."

Heiner mentioned that the European Commission has addressed Google's business practices and is working toward a resolution that will keep Google in line, but the FTC, however, is taking it a little too easy on the search giant.

"Meanwhile, in the United States, news reports have stated that the FTC may close its investigation if Google merely makes certain “voluntary commitments” to reform its behavior," wrote Heiner. "Separately, news reports suggest that Google will finally agree to live up to its promises to make its standard essential patents available to all on reasonable terms. Unfortunately, this agreement appears to be less demanding than the pledge the U.S. Department of Justice received from Apple and Microsoft nearly a year ago."

Heiner complained that Microsoft had raised the issue about the full-featured YouTube app almost two years ago, and while the European Commission and the FTC are both investigating the matter, Microsoft wants the matter resolved once and for all.

Microsoft is just one tech company that is consistently targeted by the European Commission regarding antitrust laws. It started in March 2004 when a European Commission high court found the company guilty of using tactics to freeze out its competitors in the media player and server software markets. It was fined $690 million.

Back in 2008, the EU fined Microsoft $1.4 billion for refusing to comply during its legal feud with the EU between July 2006 and October 2007. Microsoft was charged $3.83 million a day for each day of non-compliance.

Moving forward to 2009, the EU went after Microsoft again for tying Internet Explorer to Windows, and by doing so, Microsoft is "stealing" a unique and unfair advantage.

The EU has been on top of Microsoft throughout 2012, with most problems stemming from browser choices in Windows 7 and more browser issues with Windows RT.
In December, the Commission began investigating Microsoft's policy changes in Bing and Hotmail to make sure they comply with user privacy.

You can read Heiner's full post here.

Source: TechNet



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Waste of time?
By jperez45 on 1/3/2013 12:30:02 PM , Rating: 2
This is the same thing Microsoft did to destroy Novel WordPerfect, the difference now is that youtube is not an esential software needed to run MS-Windows OS.
Youtube is just an internet based service, they doesn't have to give native support to every OS in the market, that's the reason to make web applications, to use the web browser instead of doing a native application for every OS.

In the other hand Microsoft has to give developers accurate support to developers because they do OS, and that is what runs applications.
(what was not needed for Microsoft in that time was a better Office software like the one they were introducing to market).


RE: Waste of time?
By chripuck on 1/3/2013 2:58:47 PM , Rating: 5
You clearly don't understand the issue. Microsoft has written the app and is ready to release it. All they need is for Google to give them permission to reference their API's (one's that are already available for Android/iOS.) Google instead is actively BLOCKING these API requests when they come from a Windows Phone. How could you defend this? Google has to do zero work here, in fact, they had to do more work to block them than simply leave their API open.


RE: Waste of time?
By Integral9 on 1/3/2013 5:18:51 PM , Rating: 2
Isn't this the same as Microsoft not allowing other companies to use the APIs in Windows that Microsoft's apps use to hook into the core of the operating system and thus provide a better experience?


RE: Waste of time?
By Fritzr on 1/5/2013 12:06:51 AM , Rating: 3
The Google APIs are published public hooks
The MS APIs you mention are undocumented & private

I know it is only a minor difference, public access & visible vs unsupported, subject to change without notice & invisible, so why should this matter?


"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki