Print 83 comment(s) - last by Cheesew1z69.. on Jan 4 at 2:02 PM

Dealerships don't want to spend more on tools needed to service the Volts since sales for most are down

Select Chevrolet dealerships around the U.S. are ditching the Volt after General Motors (GM) hiked up the price of tools to service the vehicle.

Last year, dealerships spent $1,800 to $2,800 on tools that are required to service each Volt plug-in hybrid. However, GM has raised the price of these tools to $5,100. The reason? A battery-repowering tool that removes and ships sections of the Volt's huge 435-pound battery for repair instead of shipping the whole thing costs dealerships about $4,735. This makes up the bulk of the tool costs while a few others are needed as well.

Due to this price hike, some dealerships have decided to stop selling the Volt altogether. Some say their overall Volt sales just don't justify the additional cost.

Allyn Barnard, owner of Jim Barnard Chevrolet in Churchville, New York, is among those who feel that way. He has only sold five Volts since the vehicle's launch in late 2010/early 2011, and doesn't see the point in paying over $5,000 for the tools needed to service them.

"Going forward, the profitability would be really hard for us to justify the expense of the repair tools," said Barnard.

The Volt may have had a bumpy start with a few production shutdowns and issues with lithium ion battery fires during National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) testing, but sales of the Volt have been very impressive over the last year. During the first seven months of 2012, GM sold 10,666 Volt extended range electric vehicles for an increase of 270% compared to the first seven months of 2011.

However, Chevrolet then had a low November sales month due to low inventory. Chevrolet sold 1,519 Volts in November 2012, which represented a 33 percent increase over November 2011. But the number of cars sold in November was roughly half the number sold in October and September when the company sold 2,961 and 2,851 Volts respectively.

Chevrolet said this is a good thing, though, because it means demand is higher than expected

As of December 2012, General Motors had sold 20,828 Volts for the year. 

Despite these excellent numbers (Nissan was hoping to sell 20,000 Leafs in 2012, but fell way short), about 70 percent of Volt sales are generated by the 300 top-selling dealerships. There are about 2,614 dealerships certified to sell the Volt.

Source: Automotive News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: For Pete's sake
By bobsmith1492 on 1/2/2013 5:55:05 PM , Rating: 2
How amazing it must be to have $40K to blow on a car.

RE: For Pete's sake
By Acupuncture84 on 1/2/2013 6:07:01 PM , Rating: 1
It was actually 45k, but that $7500 tax credit will come in handy this year. Not to mention all of that money I'm saving on gas. = )

RE: For Pete's sake
By Chaser on 1/2/2013 6:59:09 PM , Rating: 2
Glad the taxpayers, many people that work hard every day, who have to ride public transit to work to thankless jobs, could fund your overpriced eco snob machine.

RE: For Pete's sake
By chromal on 1/2/2013 8:29:56 PM , Rating: 2
Don't throw a rock in a glass house. Folks who don't drive or own cars could just as easily protest how much public money and resources go to supporting and subsidizing individual car owners by virtual of the road network itself, urban and suburban space given over to vast seas of parking spaces, etc.

RE: For Pete's sake
By Ringold on 1/3/2013 2:42:32 AM , Rating: 4
No, in fact, they couldn't complain, since taxes are levied against fuel and car ownership in a myriad way that supports highway spending. Local and, to an extent, the federal governments general funds top up that spending, but folks who don't drive cars absolutely still use them indirectly. That milk didn't come from a cow hidden behind the grocery store, after all. It traveled, probably hundreds of miles.

No such public benefit of equal scale is derived from helping that guy be an eco-smug tool.

RE: For Pete's sake
By Chernobyl68 on 1/3/13, Rating: 0
RE: For Pete's sake
By ebakke on 1/3/2013 1:01:40 PM , Rating: 3
And for everyone who says the should not have helped GM, go find out how many times the airlines have been bailed out by congress.
So if I'm against the GM bailout, I have to be for the airline bailouts? Try again.

RE: For Pete's sake
By DockScience on 1/3/2013 3:59:21 PM , Rating: 2
How about this.

You live without anything delivered by truck for a year, I will live without a government subsidized electric car.

After all, both have equal value, right?

RE: For Pete's sake
By Nutzo on 1/3/2013 11:10:47 AM , Rating: 4
So you not only made the taxpayers pay $7,500 toward your car, but now you are not paying gas taxes to help maintain the roads.
You're a bigger leach on the taxpayer than the welfare queens.

RE: For Pete's sake
By ebakke on 1/3/2013 1:07:47 PM , Rating: 2
But the "rich" people owe him!! And it's for the "greater good"!!

RE: For Pete's sake
By ianweck on 1/3/2013 3:19:57 PM , Rating: 2
Oregon is in the process of introducing legislature to tax EV drivers, for that very reason.

RE: For Pete's sake
By rudolphna on 1/2/2013 6:37:26 PM , Rating: 2
I bet you don't say that to the people that drive BMWs, Mercedes, Mustang GT500s, etc etc. Or the people that drive pickups, or SUVs. Stop being an ass.

RE: For Pete's sake
By chekk4 on 1/2/13, Rating: 0
RE: For Pete's sake
By rudolphna on 1/2/2013 7:26:15 PM , Rating: 2
I'll take your comment as that you haven't actually driven a Volt. Both are engineered, but they are engineered to do different things.Have fun with your BMW, getting 20mpg in everyday driving.

RE: For Pete's sake
By chekk4 on 1/2/2013 11:51:00 PM , Rating: 1
I'll explain in greater detail. My 330i has power, handling, comfort, looks, sophistication and fuel economy all to a high degree (slightly less so with respect to the fuel economy). This means the engineering employed to develop it was first rate because usually something has to be sacrificed.
The Volt has fuel economy and .... oh, that's it (maybe comfort also). That's pretty feeble. All North American cars (and many Asian ones) seem to be like this: lots of compromise.

Yes, I know I'm paying some for the BMW brand and yes, it is expensive to maintain. If you're OK with driving something mediocre, by all means take advantage of those cost savings. If you're not OK with crap, vote with your cash and buy something that's true automotive engineering (BMW or whoever else you prefer).

Now, if the Volt and its ilk were appropriately priced, that would be different again. Coming back to the beginning, 40000 is a lot of money to spend on mediocrity.

RE: For Pete's sake
By Pneumothorax on 1/3/2013 2:39:29 AM , Rating: 2
Getting 36-38MPG everyday on my 335d ;)

RE: For Pete's sake
By Spuke on 1/3/2013 1:22:38 PM , Rating: 2
Let's not exaggerate. Unless you're driving an M3 daily, you're not getting anywhere near 20 mpg. BMW's aren't gas hogs. Most of the ones that people buy are pretty fuel efficient.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki