Print 62 comment(s) - last by jharper12.. on Jan 5 at 1:08 PM

David Cameron, the Prime Minister of the UK, said that companies like Google are immorally minimizing tax bills

Google has managed to skip paying about $1.6 billion USD (£1 billion) in taxes by way of the island Bermuda -- and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom isn't happy.

Google sent £6 billion through Bermuda over the course of last year, which halved its 2011 tax bill. In fact, Google funneled 80 percent of its global revenue through the island and ended up paying about £1 billion less to the government.

Google's Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said this "is called capitalism."

“We pay lots of taxes; we pay them in the legally prescribed ways,” said Schmidt. “I am very proud of the structure that we set up. We did it based on the incentives that the governments offered us to operate.”

David Cameron, the Prime Minister of the UK, said that companies like Google are immorally minimizing tax bills and need to be stopped. He even wrote a letter to fellow leaders of the G8 requesting a global crackdown on tax avoidance for large companies such as Google and Starbucks.

“I do believe we all have a common interest in being able to tell our taxpayers who work hard and pay their fair share of taxes that we will make sure others do the same,” wrote Cameron in an open letter to the G8.

Google's UK Head Matt Brittin said politicians are the ones who set tax rates, and that Google is playing by their rules.

Google funneled £2.6 billion of British revenue through Bermuda, which cut its UK tax bill by £200 million.

In April of last year, it was reported that Apple made $9.5 billion USD in Britain for 2011, but only paid 0.16 percent in taxes. Amazon was also targeted for its headquarters in the tiny European Union nation of Luxembourg and Google's placement in Ireland with subsidiaries in the Caribbean and Luxembourg for more tax dodging gains.

The New York Times then blamed Apple for dodging billions in taxes in a lengthy article last year.

Source: Business Insider

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: two faced
By nafhan on 1/2/2013 12:18:47 PM , Rating: 5
So, in order to not be evil, they should give the UK government more money than they are legally obligated to give? That's a really specific and kind of odd definition of evil.

Seriously, the solution to problems with tax law is NOT going to be asking for big corporations to play nice. The solution is to fix the f'ing laws!

RE: two faced
By Argon18 on 1/2/2013 12:33:28 PM , Rating: 5

Bermuda is a British territory. If Britain chooses to implement a tax structure with a favorable corporate tax rate in Bermuda, how can they fault corporations for using it? No laws were broken here, Google did everything correctly, according to British law.

This is no different from the stink the Dems made over Mitt Romney's finances. The man did everything correct and legally, he broke no laws, yet some on the left chastised him for "immoral" finances? Wtf?

Would YOU pay more in taxes than you are legally obligated to? If your tax guy says you can take these 6 deductions, are you going to say "No thanks, I only want 3 deductions, the government needs this money more than I do"? Of course not. So don't be a hypocrite and expect others to make irrational decisions.

RE: two faced
By hubb1e on 1/2/2013 1:27:13 PM , Rating: 5
And the PM knows this. It's just a stupid populist propaganda ploy. The sheep need someone to hate and it can't be the government or they won't get re-elected.

RE: two faced
By maugrimtr on 1/3/2013 9:04:43 AM , Rating: 2
It's easy for the UK to forget how things work. The main corporation tax rate in the UK is 28%. Ireland's main rate is 12.5%. If you are a US global corporation looking to set up shop in Europe, which would you choose?

Secondly, Google is not taxed as a single entity - it's subsidiaries are taxed. And these are all separate legal entities capable of selling and purchasing from other subsidiaries (i.e. the UK company can purchase services from an Irish company leaving minimal profits in the UK company capable of being taxed).

Thirdly, do the same between two Irish companies - one is not tax resident (say Bermuda) so it's not taxable under Irish law. The second company is taxable (based in Dublin) but it too must pay the Bermuda company licensing and service costs which reduce the taxable profit, i.e. the Double Irish Arrangement.

All of this results in minimal tax (mostly paid in Ireland at 12.5%) with the bulk of all profits ending up legally in Bermuda or Cayman. Emphasis on "legally"!

So you have two solutions:

1. The UK changes the law around transfer pricing to ensure greater taxable profits are recorded in the UK (same goes for France, Germany, Australia, The Moon ;)).
2. Ireland changes its non-resident corporation tax law. This will never happen since its 12.5% rate should make it clear it's focus is on attractive well paying service jobs for its citizens - not shaking out the pockets of the golden geese supplying those jobs.

So this is really just that - the British PM mouthing off in public. France also likes to mouth about "tax harmonisation" - it charges 34% corporation tax vs the UK's 28%, Germany's 30% and Ireland's 12.5%. You can see the odd one out - Ireland has positioned itself as friendly to US Corporations.

You'll also note that the US has done nothing to upset this either. The US transfer pricing laws are what make all of this tax avoidance possible in the first place since taxes are levied only on repatriated profit (it never is unless there's one of those infrequent tax amnesties).

All legal, above board, and in a world where those who can change the law simply refuse to do so because it suits them as much as it suits Google.

RE: two faced
By mjv.theory on 1/2/2013 1:37:06 PM , Rating: 2
I think politicians, especially those putting themselves forward to be a head of government, should treat themselves as a particularly special case. They should make absolutely sure, right at the beginning of their political career, to pay all due taxes and to avoid all tax avoidance schemes, legal or otherwise. Paying taxes like this would not be a sign of stupidity or lack of financial savvy - it is a demonstration of good moral compass. Mr Romney was not technically in the wrong, but it was not very clever nor impressive on his part.

Government is not about "doing business", it is about defining and providing a social infrastructure; part of which is enabling business to operate such that both companies, and the wider society of which they are a part, can flourish in a fair and sustainable way.

As for international corporations: they are often offered all sorts of tax breaks to set up business in a given country. The onus should quite rightly be on the law makers to close loop holes of which they do not approve and to define the rules under which they wish business to operate.

RE: two faced
By chris2618 on 1/2/2013 2:10:56 PM , Rating: 3
The UK parliament doesn't have legislative power with regards to the internal affairs of Bermuda.

RE: two faced
By nolisi on 1/3/2013 2:00:31 PM , Rating: 2
This is no different from the stink the Dems made over Mitt Romney's finances.

He used a loophole to defer personal taxes on an already lower personal gains tax through the Mormon Church.

Congress changed the law to close the loophole in 1997, but he was grandfathered in.

Part of the problem is the law- you are correct. But when money (and church, in this case) play with politics, people in power can structure laws to their own advantage.

The best example is that we've all been convinced that capital gains should be taxed lower than traditional income because "it encourages investment." And yet we live in a society where we complain that there isn't enough skilled labor for the jobs we insource for, and we outsource what is considered to be unskilled labor. Shouldn't we be encouraging people to work hard just as much, if not moreso than investors? Investors will continue to invest because it's the easiest way to make money work for them.

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki