Judge Koh Forces Samsung to Make Unit Sales Public in Apple Infringement Case
January 2, 2013 1:22 PM
comment(s) - last by
Samsung says release damages it competitively; federal judge says "too bad", sides with local firm, Apple
While Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and Apple, Inc. (
) are still preparing to
square off for a second major patent infringement case
, both companies are also actively engrossed in battling over damages in the first case, which saw Apple found innocent of infringement and Samsung guilty of
$1.05B USD in willful infringement
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Lucy Koh
gave Samsung a bit of a boost in December when she
rejected Apple's request to ban sales
of 26 Samsung "Galaxy" products, writing that Apple failed to prove that Samsung's infringement drove the demand for Samsung products.
But she's still in the process of finalizing how much Samsung should have to pay Apple.
And this week she dealt Samsung a blow,
a request by Samsung to seal the results of a Dec. 10 request she made to Samsung. Judge Koh had asked Samsung last month to reveal unit sales of certain products over certain time periods. It is unknown what models precisely were requested, but they likely included the Galaxy S and Galaxy S II smartphones -- centerpieces of Apple's first infringement case against Samsung.
Samsung had pleaded with Judge Koh to keep those details out of the public eye, arguing that it would damage it from a competitive perspective. Judge Koh had little sympathy for the South Korean electronics company, though, siding with local firm Apple, who argued the information should be made public regardless of the damage to its rival.
Apple is pushing Judge Koh to
triple the damages
to over $3B USD, which can be done in certain cases if the infringement was deemed "willful". Samsung, meanwhile, is urging Judge Koh to trim the settlement, pointing out that the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
has filed preliminary invalidation rulings regarding
two of the
key Apple utility patents
involved in the case.
Thus at this point damages could go in any direction. For now all that is clear is that we'll soon be learning some new information on Samsung sales and that for now no Samsung products are banned.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Glad to see it
1/3/2013 10:56:26 AM
The only thing you are getting straight is showing everyone how biased you are and how much of an Apple hater you are.
Just because you or a group of you did tests on the iPhone 4 and came up with biased-driven negative results, does not mean it was a universal problem with all iPhone 4s. In fact, it appears the issue is limited to your biology, and people like you.
Just because you and a number of people like you can have varying results with signal loss on other phones does not mean the issue didn't exist.
It is very clear that you hate Apple - maybe Apple raped your poodle or your hamster, I don't know. But people like you can skew public perception if you all are vocal enough. The fact that you are pissed at Jobs for saying people were holding the phone wrong and it offended your sensibilities, you want to bring Apple down. Grow a skin and stop being sensitive. Shit happens all the time. If you're going to let *words* destroy you, good luck surviving the world.
RE: Glad to see it
1/3/2013 11:10:49 AM
I don't understand where you are coming from or what impression you get when you mis-read everything others say and then post against it.
#1, I don't hate Apple. I said it was an issue and they handled it in an arrogant way with the "you are holding it wrong" comment. You went all sorts of sideways at that comment. You have done this before. You take one comment and pigeon hole the person that made it as if it was their life's philosophy. Sorry, I am more dynamic than that. I like Apple for thier contributions and I dislike them for thier arrogance and politics. What of it? What I said above is a fact. Steve Jobs did say that about the issue, while his engineers got busy and fixed it. It was an arrogant thing to say. I personally commend Apple for their contributions to the industry and thank them for the iPhone. It was leaps and bounds better than anything else on the market at the time and it literally forced everyone else to raise their games. We all benefit from that. We all benefit from their push on higher resolutions too. thanks again Apple. Does that sound like something an Apple hater would say? Like anything else, they do some good and some bad moves. Overall, a good force in the industry. I can say I don't like Steve Jobs crappy comment and I don't like Apple's ridiculously hippo-critical lawsuits. That doesn't make me a hater, it makes me observant and human and very normal in that regard. Any normal person would look at that and agree. Only a nut would get all bent about it and fgeel some strange need to defend a company.
#2. I never said it was
"universal problem with all iPhone 4s"
just that it was a problem and they fixed it. Again, you got bent at the mere assertion that it was a problem. Sorry again, it was a problem and that is a fact.
RE: Glad to see it
1/3/2013 11:35:48 AM
This is where my last post was meant to go. But somehow it got misplaced to another poster's comment.
RE: Glad to see it
1/3/2013 11:43:13 AM
Then we mainly agree other than the part about how Apple is being "stolen" from.
I would argue that Apple "stealing" the whole smartphone idea from Palm and RIMM was far more ofa major theft than Samsung "stealing" rounded corners, packaging material and slide to unlock (by the way Apple "stole" that too). If you see both sides so well, you need to focus that razor sharp sense of yours on Apple too eh?
Whatever though. I am done with your nonsense.
“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
Another Key Apple Patent, Pinch to Zoom, is Rejected by USPTO
December 20, 2012, 12:59 PM
Judge Koh Gives Apple a Lump of Coal, Denies Samsung Smartphone Ban
December 18, 2012, 12:49 PM
Apple Aims to Tack on Galaxy Note II and 5 Other Products to Existing Lawsuit
November 26, 2012, 2:05 PM
USPTO Makes Preliminary Move to Kill Apple's Rubber Band Patent
October 24, 2012, 11:00 AM
Apple Goes for the Jugular, Asks Judge to Triple Samsung Damages to $3B
September 19, 2012, 12:24 PM
MSI's AMD Richland (A10)/Neptune (7/8xxxM) Gaming Notebooks Start at $1,299 USD
May 22, 2013, 3:15 PM
Apples Tries to Use Decade-Old Patents to Ban Samsung Galaxy S IV
May 22, 2013, 3:00 PM
Intel Shake-Up to Focus on Mobile, New Devices
May 22, 2013, 11:04 AM
Report: DISH CEO Makes Aggressive $2B USD Bid for LightSquared's Spectrum
May 20, 2013, 10:25 PM
Apple Releases Tim Cook's Testimony on Corporate Tax Laws
May 20, 2013, 7:40 PM
Apple's Tim Cook to Talk Profit Shifting, Taxes at U.S. Senate Hearing
May 20, 2013, 1:44 PM
Most Popular Articles
High School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds
May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM
Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates
May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM
Seawater Cooling Saves Data Center Big Bucks, Energy, Despite Jellyfish Issues
May 17, 2013, 3:23 PM
U.S. Federal Traffic Board Wants to Make Drunk Driving Threshold Far Harsher
May 15, 2013, 11:32 AM
Newegg Legal Chief: "We don't Feed the Trolls"; Defeats Bell Lab Shell Comp.
May 17, 2013, 10:11 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Lumosity: Does it Work?
May 22, 2013, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Sony "Teases" PS4 Ahead of Xbox Reveal in New Video
May 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Nokia Introduces Instagram-Like App of Its Own to Help Lumia Sales
May 20, 2013, 7:10 AM
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information