NASA's NEXT Ion Thruster Breaks a Record for Continuous Operation
December 31, 2012 5:53 PM
comment(s) - last by
NASA's NEXT engine
NEXT is a seven-kilowatt thruster that receives electrical power from solar panels or a nuclear power source
NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) ion engine has broken the record for hours of continuous operation.
has clocked 43,000 hours of continuous operation at NASA's Glenn Research Center's Electric Propulsion Laboratory, breaking the overall record. The 43,000 hours is equivalent to nearly five years of continuous operation.
NEXT is a seven-kilowatt thruster that receives electrical power from solar panels or a nuclear power source instead of burning fuel. The electricity is then used to ionize molecules of xenon and a cathode to accelerate them electrostatically. When the molecules come out of the engine, they create thrust.
For the entire 43,000 hours of continuous operation, NEXT only consumed 770 kg of xenon propellant. The engine would offer 30 million-newton-seconds of total impulse to a spacecraft.
The NEXT ion engine is meant to send spacecraft into deep space missions further and faster with more efficiency than engines that burn fuel.
Making more efficient spacecraft has been an important goal in the space industry. For instance, SpaceX, a private California-based space transport company that was the first of its kind to send a spacecraft to the International Space Station (ISS) this year, recently showed off its
for reusable rockets.
The Grasshopper Project is a Falcon first stage with a landing gear that's capable of taking off and landing vertically. It does this by shooting into orbit, turning around, restarting the engine, heading back to the launch site, changing its direction and deploying the landing gear. The end result is a vertical landing.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Distance traveled?
1/2/2013 4:20:11 PM
Need to know the Thrust, Mass, and Relative Velocity of the ions to figure how far you would have traveled for a given time of engine operation. Acceleration would not even be a constant since the mass would be getting less over time while the thrust should remain constant. Mass loss and acceleration I believe would be linear(not sure since it has been a very long time since I did those equations) and velocity would increase in more of a quadratic curve than a linear one.
"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov
SpaceX Shows Off "Grasshopper Project" for Reusable Rockets
December 26, 2012, 8:38 AM
ESA OKs Ion Thruster for Trip to Mercury
January 21, 2008, 2:20 AM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information