Print 65 comment(s) - last by rdhood.. on Jan 2 at 3:05 PM

Judy Neiman with a picture of her daughter Sydnee  (Source: Yahoo News)
They suspect cost is the driving force

Even though the regulations for backup cameras in new vehicles is near, grieving parents and safety advocates want to know what the heck has taken so long.

The rearview camera mandate would make it so every vehicle would have a backup camera for seeing behind the vehicle when in reverse. The idea was triggered by the 300 deaths and 16,000 injuries annually caused by a driver's inability to see behind their vehicle when backing up. Many of the injuries and death affect young children and senior citizens. 

Judy Neiman, 53, of West Richland, Washington, is just one of the many people who have experienced a tragic death due to driving a car in reverse without properly checking her surroundings before backing up. She accidentally backed over and killed her 9-year-old daughter, Sydnee.

"They have to do something, because I've read about it happening to other people. I read about it and I said, 'I would die if it happens to me,'" said Neiman. "Then it did happen to me."

The White House is doing something about it, but there have been several delays in regulating the use of these cameras. The rearview camera regulations date back to 2007, when Congress initially approved legislation to set these standards by February 28, 2011. This date was delayed to February of this year, and again to December 31.

While the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are both behind the making of these new standards, others, namely automakers, have worried that the cost of installing these cameras on each vehicle would drive the price up too high. Parents and safety advocates blame worries regarding cost for the delays in safety. 

NHTSA estimated that adding backup cameras to every car would add $58 to $88 to the price of vehicles that have an existing dashboard display screens. It would cost $159 to $203 for those without them.

DOT Secretary Ray LaHood said he is meeting with White House officials to finalize the regulations by December 31.

In the meantime, Neiman grieves over her lost child who had survived four open-heart surgeries like a champ, but was eventually killed due to her mistake. She couldn't see her 4-foot tall daughter behind her van when pulling out of the garage.

Source: Yahoo News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ???
By aurareturn on 12/27/2012 4:17:49 PM , Rating: -1
1. Can't really blame her driving an Escalade.
2. It happens. You can't always be prepared for every accident. That's why they're accidents.
3. It happens.

Of course a lot of it comes down to personal responsibility. But if having a backup camera helps, then it helps.

I don't think this woman is trying to shift responsibility. I think she wants this enacted so it could help others and maybe it could have helped her.

If I killed someone backing up, I'd advocate for back up cameras too.

RE: ???
By ChronoReverse on 12/27/2012 4:22:18 PM , Rating: 2
I'd advocate for [i]checking behind your car before backing up [/i](backup cameras have dead angles too, conveniently where a child could in fact be in position to be backed over).

RE: ???
By Rukkian on 12/27/2012 4:37:53 PM , Rating: 4
But why get the government involved? If people want the cameras, let them buy a car with the camera. I personally do not want a camera.

I have used numerous cars with cameras, backup sensors and nothing. IMO, the sensors are the best solution, as you still need to use your head and eyes and look around while having added security. It is very distracting using the cameras.

RE: ???
By geddarkstorm on 12/27/2012 4:54:06 PM , Rating: 4
I agree. The sensors are actually pretty nice, since they are auditory and not vying for your visual attention like the cameras. The cameras will lead to nothing but trouble.

RE: ???
By ClownPuncher on 12/27/2012 6:22:57 PM , Rating: 3
Why not just accept responsibility then buy your own backup cameras? I'd advocate people be more mindful when they drive.

RE: ???
By Thalyn on 12/28/2012 1:00:10 AM , Rating: 1
1. Can't really blame her driving an Escalade.

I can.

I have a 44 year-old sedan, capable of seating 6 full-grown adults in relative comfort. It gets around 16MPG (US - it needs new rings). That gives it basically the same occupancy and fuel efficiency as a modern SUV - except I guarantee that I have significantly better visibility, safety and practicality than any SUV could hope of having, while also having a better acceleration profile as a result of an appropriately sized engine and significantly lower body weight.

Backup cameras be damned. If you need something like that, the vehicle in question is already poorly designed. How about starting by mandating visibility and practicality, then move on to secondary facilities once the primary ones are in check.

RE: ???
By erple2 on 12/29/2012 3:13:21 PM , Rating: 2
Well, you're delusional if you think that your late 1960's model car is safer than any vehicle on the road today.

But I will concede most of your other points...

However, people have been accidentally run over by backing up for years - pretty much since anyone was able buy a car.

This is, however, not a good idea, IMO. Airbags? Good. Seatbelts? Great. Stability Control? Surprisingly Good. Backup camera? Bad mandate. Holding people accountable? Usually good.

"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki