backtop


Print 28 comment(s) - last by tng.. on Dec 30 at 10:55 AM


  (Source: agbeat.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com)
Facebook announced that it will begin testing a new Facebook Messaging system

If you thought that seeing advertisements in your Facebook news feed was annoying, get ready for Facebook's latest marketing scheme: ads sent to your inbox.

Facebook announced that it will begin testing a new Facebook Messaging system, where users can no longer choose to have just friends or connections message their inbox; instead, people (or marketers) can pay to have messages sent to you. 

Right now, relevant messages from friends can be sent to your inbox while other less relevant messages are sent to the "Other" folder. What non-friends or marketers can do is pay to make sure their message is sent to your inbox instead of the "Other" folder.

"Today we’re starting a small experiment to test the usefulness of economic signals to determine relevance," said Facebook's announcement. "This test will give a small number of people the option to pay to have a message routed to the Inbox rather than the Other folder of a recipient that they are not connected with.

"Several commentators and researchers have noted that imposing a financial cost on the sender may be the most effective way to discourage unwanted messages and facilitate delivery of messages that are relevant and useful."

Facebook said the new service will have restrictions, such as keeping it to personal messages only and allowing only one per week during the testing phase. Facebook said it will allow people to message someone they may have seen speak live or perform, but aren't friends with, or seek others out for job opportunities (sort of like LinkedIn, where you have to upgrade to a paid account to send someone private InMail).

However, it's likely that Facebook is just doing this to allow marketers greater reach to its one billion monthly active users.

Just last month, Google's Vice President of Product Bradley Horowitz bashed Facebook's approach to ads. He criticized the fact that ads are forced into people's news feeds. He even went as far as comparing Facebook ads to a guy with a sandwich board popping in between a father and his daughter during an important conversation. 

"We don't have to make next week's payroll by jamming ads at users," said Horowitz.

Source: The Consumerist



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Failbook
By EricMartello on 12/22/2012 12:43:18 AM , Rating: 2
Despite its massive traffic Facebook has consistently failed to effectively monetize this in a reliable way. The ads it displays are usually tuned out, and most of its new ideas would just alienate its users because it amounts to spamming them.

I do not have a problem with Facebook making money but all these "genius startups" who are little more than a 'not-so-original idea at right place, right time' need to realize that if you cannot offer users a value that they would feel compelled to pay for then you really cannot inundate them with ads and expect them to continue using the service.

Facebook grew because it was free to use...and I'd feel safe in saying that the costs of scaling it up to service the millions of users it has now are not inline with the revenues they generate from their current monetization efforts.

Whoever is working on the "next" facebook right now should take note. If you want to make money in the future then you better not build your user base on the premise that it's entirely free, forever.




"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki