backtop


Print 28 comment(s) - last by tng.. on Dec 30 at 10:55 AM


  (Source: agbeat.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com)
Facebook announced that it will begin testing a new Facebook Messaging system

If you thought that seeing advertisements in your Facebook news feed was annoying, get ready for Facebook's latest marketing scheme: ads sent to your inbox.

Facebook announced that it will begin testing a new Facebook Messaging system, where users can no longer choose to have just friends or connections message their inbox; instead, people (or marketers) can pay to have messages sent to you. 

Right now, relevant messages from friends can be sent to your inbox while other less relevant messages are sent to the "Other" folder. What non-friends or marketers can do is pay to make sure their message is sent to your inbox instead of the "Other" folder.

"Today we’re starting a small experiment to test the usefulness of economic signals to determine relevance," said Facebook's announcement. "This test will give a small number of people the option to pay to have a message routed to the Inbox rather than the Other folder of a recipient that they are not connected with.

"Several commentators and researchers have noted that imposing a financial cost on the sender may be the most effective way to discourage unwanted messages and facilitate delivery of messages that are relevant and useful."

Facebook said the new service will have restrictions, such as keeping it to personal messages only and allowing only one per week during the testing phase. Facebook said it will allow people to message someone they may have seen speak live or perform, but aren't friends with, or seek others out for job opportunities (sort of like LinkedIn, where you have to upgrade to a paid account to send someone private InMail).

However, it's likely that Facebook is just doing this to allow marketers greater reach to its one billion monthly active users.

Just last month, Google's Vice President of Product Bradley Horowitz bashed Facebook's approach to ads. He criticized the fact that ads are forced into people's news feeds. He even went as far as comparing Facebook ads to a guy with a sandwich board popping in between a father and his daughter during an important conversation. 

"We don't have to make next week's payroll by jamming ads at users," said Horowitz.

Source: The Consumerist



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: [self-righteous rage]
By Aloonatic on 12/21/2012 11:18:56 AM , Rating: 2
You don't have to be a ******* to use social networking and find those sites useful. However, I agree with the general statement that people don't understand that there's no such thing as a free lunch/app/web service.

Social networks can be very useful for lazy people like myself who have friends and family who've moved all over the world and who don't just spam their status messages with what they had for lunch, so maybe I'm lucky, but facebook is handy. I only check it a few times a week though.

Do you think that anyone would be able to come up with a paid for, add free version of facebook/Google+ though? It's a shame that we are probably way too far down the line for that to happen. I can't even be bothered to change to Google+, which from what I've seen looks to be better than facebook, and the thing is, it's not just me who has to move, all my friends do too. That's where facebook are onto a winner now. They either have users like me who don't use it enough to be bothered with the hassle of moving to a new service, or they have users with 100s of "friends" who can't move to another service unless they all do too, en-masse.


RE: [self-righteous rage]
By Xplorer4x4 on 12/21/2012 3:04:46 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Social networks can be very useful for lazy people like myself who have friends and family who've moved all over the world and who don't just spam their status messages with what they had for lunch, so maybe I'm lucky, but facebook is handy. I only check it a few times a week though.

Generally speaking I loathe facebook! However, like you mentioned, it does have a certain convenience to it in terms of staying in touch with those at a distance. Also, a man formed a local group that monitors the radio frequencies of first responders in the ti-state area. It can be a major convenience in terms of knowing where bad accidents are causing traffic delays, it can be a major source of entertainment given some of the ludicrous crap that is called in to 911 but they have to respond to, and it is just generally interesting in cases where you have been blown off the road by 3 cops, and ambulance, and a fire truck, and you are curious to know what happened. Plus they typically have more reliable information then the local media outlets, more to the point then local media outlets, and have the information posted long before the local media does.


"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki