DailyTech - ITC Judge Smacks Down Google in Patent Suit Against Apple

Submit News

Gadgets ITC Judge Smacks Down Google in Patent Suit Against Apple
Jason Mick (Blog) - December 19, 2012 10:06 AM

21 comment(s) - last by foolsgambit11.. on Dec 21 at 8:19 AM

Patent could have been used to carry out an import ban on the iPhone

Google Inc. (GOOG) received a blow on Tuesday when U.S. International Trade Commission Administrative Law Judge Thomas Pender ruled that a patent on proximity sensor behavior belonging to Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility was invalid.

The patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,246,862 is one of six utility patents Google is using [PDF] to try to ban import of Apple, Inc.'s (AAPL) iPhone smartphone and iPad tablet. Motorola spokeswoman Jennifer Weyrauch-Erickson in a comment to Reuters remarked, "We're disappointed with this outcome and are evaluating our options."

Apple and Google are both keen to convince the ITC that the other infringes on its intellectual property, as their suits/countersuits have already been dismissed with prejudice from federal courts three times. In other words the ITC is likely both companies' last hope at banning each others' products in the U.S.

The ITC had previously ruled that three other patents in the case were either invalid or were not infringed upon by Apple products. That leaves only two patents Apple may have infringed upon. The full panel of judges assigned to the case will review these preliminary conclusions and make a final decision on whether to accept or reject Motorola Mobility's request for injunctive relief (a ban on Apple imports).

_{Google is seeking to ban virtually all Apple's devices [Image Source: Apple]}

Google purchase Motorola Mobility in April 2011 for $12.5B USD. The purchase was completed earlier this year, after it was finally greenlighted by regulators in China.

Source: Reuters

Comments

Threshold

Username
Password
remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Invalid??

By foolsgambit11 on 12/21/2012 8:19:09 AM , Rating: 2

It looks pretty clear to me from the patent wording that a proximity sensor was the intended sensor, not a light sensor. Besides, a light sensor would turn off the touch-sensitive interface in the dark. Now if Apple used a touch-sensitive sensor rather than a proximity sensor, that would be a different method of implementing the same concept, albeit less effective in real-world usage, since not everyone puts their ear to the phone in the same place, or even at all.

Still, I'm okay with this patent being invalidated for being obvious, or maybe for being overly broad, as long as a similar standard is upheld in all cases. I'm just not confident that that will happen.

Parent

"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins