backtop


Print 66 comment(s) - last by TakinYourPoint.. on Dec 14 at 9:24 PM


  (Source: blogcdn.com)
Apple's Asian supplier Hon Hai Precision Co. is working with Sharp on the designs

While Apple's iPhone and iPad are largely successful, there's one gadget the tech giant just can't seem to get off the ground: Apple TV.

However, a new report from The Wall Street Journal said that Apple may not be bombing out completely in the television realm as it's currently testing TV designs with component suppliers in Asia.

Two sources from some of Apple's suppliers confirmed that Apple is testing designs for a high-definition, large-screen TV set. They also mentioned that Hon Hai Precision Co. (which trades as Foxconn) is working with Sharp Corp. on the project.

While the TV is still in its earliest stages, this represents progress in Apple's TV venture, since products are usually developed and tested in-house before being sent out to suppliers. But it's important to keep in mind that Apple has tested many TV prototypes and this one may not make it to production, either.

Nevertheless, it's a spring forward for the successful tech company who could one day compete with the likes of Samsung, which is already a fierce competitor in the mobile hardware market. As far as television software, Apple could face competitors like Google with its own smart Google TV. Apple's iOS software for mobile devices already competes with Google's Android operating system.

Apple currently sells Apple TV, which is a $99 digital media receiver that plays content from the iTunes Store, YouTube, Netflix, Hulu Plus, etc. However, Apple wants Apple TV to be so much more. For example, a game console, the ability to receive live content over the Web, live content from television networks, surf the Internet, record shows via a built in hard drive, watch Internet videos and play pictures/songs.

Apple's biggest issue with making that dream a reality, however, is its inability to strike a deal with content providers on cable networks for live television content. Comcast and CBS have rejected any affiliation with Apple TV, saying that it wants too much control over the content.

Apple has been fighting this battle with content providers since 2005, but has been unsuccessful so far.

But that doesn't mean Apple TV is a total lost cause. The tech giant was still able to strike deals with content streaming services like Netflix and Hulu Plus to provide content that can be viewed on a television screen. In Q1 2012, Apple sold 1.4 million Apple TV devices, which isn't too bad, but of course Apple is striving for a better product and better sales.

Source: The Wall Street Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 4k Resolution
By momorere on 12/13/2012 12:53:04 PM , Rating: 2
You do realize that a 4k TV costs at least $20,000 right now don't you ? Also realize that no 4k content exists now either. Now just add the mandatory crApple tax and you are looking at at least $30,000 for a TV. Also consider how it will not be called iTV, well at least in the UK. crApple has already been warned against naming it that due to TV station iTV that has been around before Prophet Jobs was born.

I personally can't wait until crApple invents the TV as I have only read about them in sci-fi books.


RE: 4k Resolution
By Cheesew1z69 on 12/13/2012 12:55:46 PM , Rating: 2
You look like an idiot every time you post using the "crApple". Grow up.


RE: 4k Resolution
By momorere on 12/13/2012 1:04:58 PM , Rating: 2
I used to think you were funny posting about crApple but it has gotten way out ta hand. Grow up coming from the guy that acts like he is 12 ? That is almost as pathetic as Tony.


RE: 4k Resolution
By Cheesew1z69 on 12/13/12, Rating: 0
RE: 4k Resolution
By RufusM on 12/13/2012 2:23:30 PM , Rating: 2
Here it goes:

crApple, Scroogle, Samesung and Micro$oft. Any others?

Oh yeah, iSheep and Fandroid too.


RE: 4k Resolution
By Mint on 12/14/2012 12:15:52 PM , Rating: 2
Unit cost is not $20k. They're selling it for that much because they want to maximize margins.

Apple's legion of fans brings volume with it. That's how they were first with the iPad and MacBook retina displays. When Lenovo offers higher res as an option, the common buyer doesn't pick it. When Apple makes it mandatory, their fans are willing to pay the extra price, because they trust Apple to make tech decisions for them. It's Apple's biggest strength, and something nobody else can replicate.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if Apple led the charge for 4K initially, but it will be LCD at first. I think OLED will outshine it within a year or two, and Samsung seems to be the leader on that front also.


"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki