backtop


Print 76 comment(s) - last by Insurgence.. on Dec 14 at 8:07 PM

Notorious spammer claims net neutrality applies to spam

Jason Flanary (R), chief operating officer at ccAdvertising -- a company specializing in political text message spam – turned heads during the last presidential election by sending unsolicited messages to smartphones with statements like, "Obama believes killing children is a right until the umbilical cord is cut."

While Mr. Flanary was disappointed to lose his own election bid for the Virginia state senate [source] amid the controversy that ensued, he's now pushing ahead on an even more ambitious effort.  He's asked the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to either whitelist political spam (or "political messages" as he views it) or to declare spam in general protected free speech.

Either way, he argues, it should be illegal for private businesses to block or discriminate against using filters traffic they consider "spam".

In the wake of the ccAdvertising text campaign many carriers began to block his company's messages, recognizing that their customers did not want the unsolicited and often times unwelcome texts.  But in doing so Mr. Flanary claims they broke the law.

Jason Flanary
Jason Flanary is among the Republicans breaking with part ranks to voice support for net neutrality, arguing it should be expanded to protect political spam.
[Image Source: FairFax Patch]

His stand is unusual as in the past most federal Republicans contended that net neutrality was an abusive expansion of federal power and intrusion on free market.  Now it appears that at least some Republicans may be changing their mind, looking to leverage the FCC policy to their advantage.

If you want to respond to Mr. Flanary's claim that political text message spam is protected free speech, the FCC welcomes public comments here.  Be aware, you must give your real name and address.

Sources: FCC [filing], [comments], DailyKos



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By FaaR on 12/13/2012 1:37:02 PM , Rating: 2
Are you sure?

Here you have a douchebag who wants spamblocks to be outlawed so he can send unsolicited lies about his political opponents (he probably views them as adversaries though) to anyone with a cellphone, regardless of wether they want them or not - probably not though!

Can you imagine your phone buzzing incessantly with droves of useless texts pouring in from every douche who has snake oil to sell? Would you enjoy that? I think not.

Anyway, what this douche fails to realize - or outright disregards in his holy crusade to further his own ambitions - is just WHAT exactly is the most common type of spam? ...Namely penis enlargement, viagra, "escort services".

If there's ONE thing repugnicans blow their top collectively over, it's anything remotely connected to sex, especially if it's directed at children. Imagine the outrage if Little Timmy (or Tina, for that matter) start receiving droves of sex spam texts to their phones just because this douche wanted spam declared free speech? LOL, it wouldn't be a pretty sight.

Who do you think these repugnicans would blame, the one responsible - one of their own - or the person they always blame for everything that they feel is wrong...? (Yeah, I'm talking about president Obama.)

So ask yourself, who is REALLY the dumber? This guy's supposedly a republican politician, and he can't see further than his own nose when it comes to the consequences of his actions. Think about that for a second...


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki