backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by Piiman.. on Dec 29 at 3:39 PM

3D printed AR lower receiver doesn't meet expectations

One of the more interesting technologies for creating rapid prototypes and other items is 3D printing. 3D printing is capable of producing just about anything you can imagine from implantable cartilage for medical uses, to prototype parts and even weapons.

A project called Defense Distributed has been working on 3D printer files that allow users to create components to build their own guns using a 3D printer. A group of testers used a 3D printed gun part design from creator HaveBlue to produce an AR lower receiver (the lower receiver is a key component of the weapon that receives the rifle cartridge from the magazine) and headed to the gun range.

Unfortunately, it appears that recoil pressure in the completed weapon was too much for the buffer section of the 3D printed lower. The buffer is a section that separates the stock from the upper receiver reports NBC News. The part failed after firing only six shots. To make the failure even more embarrassing, the testers were using ammunition specifically designed for lower recoil.
 
The creator of the part claims to have printed his own and used it to fire hundreds of rounds.
 
While the firearm breaking in half while in operation seems to offer the potential for harm to the shooter and those nearby, the testers say that the only damage the operator faces is that of ego. When the weapon failed, the spring and buffer popped out of the tube and fell to the ground according to the testers.

Sources: NBC News, WikiWep DevBlog



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: They haven't taken the extra step.
By Imaginer on 12/4/2012 6:01:11 PM , Rating: 1
And with a mold, you can mass produce things much faster than the printing rate of a 3D printer.


RE: They haven't taken the extra step.
By RufusM on 12/5/2012 10:24:04 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
And with a mold, you can mass produce things much faster than the printing rate of a 3D printer.


Until 3D printing technology catches up. Also, with 3D printing, changes in the production process are purely software. With a mold, you have downtime to change the mold tools in the production chain.


RE: They haven't taken the extra step.
By FITCamaro on 12/5/2012 10:37:13 AM , Rating: 2
You'll likely never be able to make a resilient gun with a 3D printer. At least not at your home. Plastic isn't known for resiliency.


By AssBall on 12/6/2012 2:04:55 PM , Rating: 3
They are working on higher end metal deposit printers that could be very viable. But like you said, these machines aren't something your gonna have in your garage any time soon.


RE: They haven't taken the extra step.
By FaaR on 12/5/2012 10:53:58 PM , Rating: 2
These objects are basically just pure epoxy resin, or something fairly similar. Epoxy on its own is not very strong (especially in tension), and quite brittle - as evidenced here. You simply drop that plastic gun on a hard floor and it's very likely to crack. Doesn't seem very viable - or safe.

Maybe if glass fiber reinforcement could be added automatically during the printing process these items would stand up to some more abusive treatments. Still wouldn't be as tough as glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic of course, but better than now anyway...


"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Related Articles
New 3D Printer Makes Implantable Cartilage
November 25, 2012, 7:28 PM
















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki