Print 88 comment(s) - last by bebimbap.. on Dec 7 at 6:24 PM

EPA responds "don't worry, we're warning folks, but we're forcing it on them anyways"

President Obama's U.S. Environmental Protection Agency made quite the unpopular decision when it pushed ahead with plans to force E15 -- a blend of fuel with a higher percentage of ethanol; mostly from "dirty" corn sources -- on consumers.  The move came despite an impassioned plea from politicians on both sides of the aisle that warned of dire consequences to livestock farmers and consumer food prices if the measure passed.

I. AAA: Stop This E15 Nonsense

Now the nation's largest travel organization, AAA has joined the critics, pleading the EPA to reconsider its decision to manipulate the market and push more ethanol on consumers.

The AAA made the decision to oppose the E15 rollout after surveying its 53 million members. What it found was somewhat surprising; despite the contentious debate about corn ethanol in the media, 95 percent of members who responded said they had never heard of E15.

AAA ethanol
AAA has petitioned the EPA to stop its E15 rollout. [Image Source: AAA]

The recommendation is also based on a second survey of auto manufacturers, which asserts that just 12 million out of the 240 million light vehicles on the road today are ready for E15.  Chrysler LLC does not certify any of its vehicles (including current models) as being safe to fuel with E15.  While General Motors Comp. (GM) and Ford Motor Comp. (F) certify their current vehicles for E15 use, they explicitly recommend against it for older vehicles, saying it can cause engine damage.

In addition to Chrysler, a number of foreign manufacturers, including Toyota Motor Corp. (TYO:7203), Nissan Motor Comp., Ltd. (TYO:7201), Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW), and Volkswagen AG (ETR:VOW) do not certify their vehicles for E15 use.  In fact, they warn that using E15 in current model year North American vehicles may void your warranty, if the vehicle receives fuel-related damage.

Chrysler, Honda Motor Comp., Ltd. (TYO:7267), Mazda Motor Corp. (TYO:7261), Kia-Hyundai, Daimler AG's (ETR:DAI) luxury imprint Mercedes-Benz, and AB Volvo (OMX:VOLV) all warn that E15 is not covered in their owner manuals and just using it may fully void your warranty coverage.

AAA President and CEO Robert Darbelnet said in a statement to The Detroit News, "It is clear that millions of Americans are unfamiliar with E15, which means there is a strong possibility that many motorists may improperly fill up using this gasoline and damage their vehicle.  Bringing E15 to the market without adequate safeguards does not responsibly meet the needs of consumers.  The sale and use of E15 should be suspended until additional gas pump labeling and consumer education efforts are implemented to mitigate problems for motorists and their vehicles."

Currently, 95 percent of gas stations nationwide sell E10, a blend that contains ten percent ethanol, a level that automakers say is less caustic to older engines.  In Dec. 2010 the "Big Three" U.S. automakers lost their case before the U.S. Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit, in which they argued against the impending EPA E15 rollout, on the grounds that it would damage their older vehicles.

Last year, the Republican-controlled U.S House of Representatives passed a bill that would have blocked the EPA from enacting the higher blend, but the Democratic-controlled Senate mothballed the bill, refusing to discuss it.  

Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.) was among the hundreds of federal politicians to sign the petition to the EPA to grant a waiver on the E15 requirement.  He said in a recent statement, "AAA's findings affirm what we have already heard — E15 causes premature engine damage and voids warranties, even on new models.  Concerns about E15 are not diminishing; they are increasing. That is telling. When an organization like AAA, a nationally trusted source for motorists, calls out the EPA, you would think the administration would listen."

II. EPA: We Don't Care

But it appears instead the administration is listening to corn advocates.  The decision to artificially inflate corn demand is a boon for big corn producers like Archer Daniels Midland Comp. (ADM) and ConAgra Foods, Inc. (CAG), which may pocket billions in profits from the manipulation.

corn profits
Big corn donates deeply to federal politiicans, who in turn reward it with billions in subsidies.
[Image Source:]

The EPA in a response to the AAA statement says it is simply not turning back on E15, commenting that instead it will add warnings to gas stations to help "educate" customers.  Comments a spokesperson, "To address these concerns, EPA has been working with AAA and other stakeholders to help inform consumers about the use of E15 and recently required all retailers that sell E15 to label fuel pumps with a prominent orange and black label that EPA developed with the Federal Trade Commission. While EPA does not require retailers to sell E15, the label will help ensure consumers are aware about which vehicles are approved for its use."

Meanwhile Bob Dinneen chief of the corn growers advocacy, the Renewable Fuels Association, blast the AAA and its fellow E15 opponents saying what's good for corn is good for the country.  He comments, "[The AAA protest] reflects a pathetic ignorance of EPA's unprecedented test program before approving E15 for commercial use. The fact is E15 has been the most aggressively and comprehensively tested fuel in the history of the agency."

For consumers whose warranties may soon be voided by the E15 rollout and whose engines may be damaged by it, as well, about the only good news is that there currently isn't much E15 across the country.  Despite the active EPA mandate, only 10 gas stations across the country have adopted the fuel.

Sources: AAA, The Detroit News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: We sure are stupid.
By EricMartello on 12/1/2012 7:48:34 PM , Rating: 3
Fuel from food - stupid
Subsidizing food crops to make fuel from them - stupider
Forcing the fuel on consumers when it will wreck their cars - stupidest.

The people who go along with corn ethanol seem to be oblivious to the fact that corn is a staple crop used for both human and animal consumption. That means fluctuations in the availability of corn will affect prices for all products that use corn or are derived from something that eats corn.

The truth is that corn ethanol is directly responsible for higher gas prices AND higher food prices combined with a negative environmental impact since more corn is grown which means more pesticides being sprayed. It also increases our national spending due to subsidies...and yet it still gets the green light.

The only thing "pathetic" here is everyone who thinks this is even a remotely good idea - at any point of the continuum. Every single person in the EPA should be fired.

I would argue that anyone who is "thinking" can see that corn or grain-based ethanol is a bad idea that isn't solving any problems and only creates new ones.

Biodiesel is the most viable "alternative" fuel that has been put forth and if own a diesel vehicle and have access to waste vegetable oil. By processing a mixture of normal pump diesel fuel with the waste vegetable oil your cost per gallon of diesel can be reduced from ~$4 to around ~$1.

Mixing it yourself is the way to go since buying pump biodiesel in the USA if it's even available offers little to no cost savings over regular diesel. There are some nice diesel cars, SUVs and trucks available now in the USA that will run on this stuff efficiently (30+ MPG).

RE: We sure are stupid.
By Lord 666 on 12/2/2012 12:55:33 AM , Rating: 2
The problem is those nice vehicles (VW, MB, BMW, Audi) are only certified through B5 biodiesel.

All Cummins based powerplants in passenger vehicles are approved for B100 consumption. Do not know about International, but assuming the same.

RE: We sure are stupid.
By EricMartello on 12/2/2012 3:27:37 AM , Rating: 2
Well that's what is good about home-made biodiesel - you adjust the ratio of waste oil to pump diesel plus additives like methanol to produce a fuel that will run in a standard diesel engine without any problems.

RE: We sure are stupid.
By Bad-Karma on 12/3/2012 4:45:45 PM , Rating: 2
Do not know about International,

My 03 IH T444E only needed a few hoses to be changed out and it runs B100 just fine. But now there are no longer any stations within 200 miles selling it. However, it's the low surfer diesel requirement that pissed me off. The sulfur acts like a lubricant to lot of the gaskets & seals. When they go bad, I've been replacing them with ones made for new requirement but what a headache.

And i also now I have to regularly add surfer additives back in whenever I fill up.

RE: We sure are stupid.
By bennyg on 12/4/2012 8:57:03 AM , Rating: 2
lol at adding sulfur back INTO fuel... the need for this situation is BEYOND stupidest.

(FYI I have a pet hate for sulfur other than for its post-combustion pollution, I have a ride with a M60-B40 nikasil V8)

RE: We sure are stupid.
By patronanejo on 12/5/2012 6:39:11 PM , Rating: 2
So take corn out of the food.

It sucks.

"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki