backtop


Print 52 comment(s) - last by nedsand.. on Dec 4 at 2:39 PM


  (Source: Reuters)
Amid low share prices, Ballmer received a chilly reception from some shareholders at their annual meeting

At Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) annual shareholder Wednesday, the company's at-times boisterous Chief Executive Steven "Steve" Ballmer brought in Microsoft's "big guns" -- former Microsoft CEO, co-founder, and tech icon Bill Gates and Chief Financial Officer Peter Klein.  But at the meeting of 450 shareholders, Mr. Ballmer did not need to enlist the help of his fellow Microsoft elite, who remained silent even as the meeting turned chilly, according to Reuters reporters in attendance.

Amid tough questions from the audience, Mr. Ballmer was candid in his assessment that Microsoft was a late-comer to the tablet game, but he told the audience in a fiery defense that he saw "nothing but a sea of upside" for Windows 8 tablets.  He comments, "We're innovating on the seam between software and hardware.  Maybe we should have done that earlier.  [But] I feel pretty good about our [current] level of innovation."

Indeed, Microsoft has some defenders in odd places.  Stephen "Steve" Wozniak, better known as the "Woz", was once a ferocious critic of Microsoft and evangelist for Apple, Inc. (AAPL), the company he co-founded.  But today he said in a recent TechCrunch interview that he fears for Apple because Microsoft has become more innovative.

Steve Ballmer
Steve Ballmer is overwhelmed with anticipation regarding his company's
prospects in the tablet market. [Image Source: Getty Images]

Others might disagree.

While Mr. Ballmer pointed optimistically to Windows Phone sales quadrupling on a year-to-year basis, the platform is still estimated to only own 2 to 4 percent of the global market, well behind Apple and market leader Google Inc. (GOOG).  While Microsoft dreams of "pulling a Google" and rising to the top of the stack, it currently is resigned to vying with embattled Research in Motion, Ltd. (TSE:RIM) for the third-place spot.

But when it came to shareholder criticism, the harshest questions came not about Microsoft's products, but rather why its share price was so low.  Indeed, Microsoft shares trade at an order of magnitude lower than their Google and Apple counterparts.  (To be fair Microsoft has significantly approximately 9 times as many shares as Apple, and 25 times as many as Google).  Apple recently passed Microsoft in market capitalization and today has a total stock value that is more than twice that of Microsoft's.

Steve Ballmer dodged the share value question, remarking, "I understand your comment... [but Microsoft has] done a phenomenal job of driving product volumes... The stock market's kind of a funny thing."

Funny indeed, but the shareholders might have been less than amused.  Mr. Ballmer did placate the critics slightly by pointing to Microsoft's $10B USD profit sharing effort which includes share buybacks and quarterly dividends.

Currently, Microsoft shares are trading at around their levels from a decade ago, having risen roughly 18 percent in 2012.  In other words, despite the criticism, shareholders should be pleased to an extent that Microsoft outperformed the Standard & Poor's 500 average of an anemic 3 percent in gains.

Source: Reuters



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: optimistic
By TakinYourPoints on 11/29/2012 9:50:27 PM , Rating: -1
I should also note that despite the difference in marketshare, that the bulk of mobile traffic and app downloads are still on the iOS side. Android users are mainly on feature phones , not high end smartphones. It is a big difference that the people obsessed with marketshare keep sidestepping.


RE: optimistic
By Solandri on 11/30/2012 4:51:48 AM , Rating: 4
That's a gross mischaracterization of what the stats say. Net Applications and W3Counter are the two web metrics which show iOS with a big lead over Android (about 3:1 to 4:1). But they normalize for unique visitors - if a device visits a website 10 times in a month, it only counts as 1 visit. They also sample only 40,000 and 50,000 sites respectively to determine their stats.

The big metric is StatCounter, which samples over 3 million sites so is much more reliable than the first two. And they actually show Android ahead (since early 2012).
http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-ww-monthly-20...

However, StatCounter doesn't normalize for unique visitors. So while a much larger percentage of iOS users browse the web with their devices, they don't really do much web browsing. The smaller percentage of Android users who do browse the web actually do more browsing than all the iOS users combined (about 3-4 times more people).

So Android is selling primarily to both feature phone users and hardcore users (high-end set buyers). I'd say iOS is selling primarily to the feature phone users too, it's just that the higher price of the iPhone/iPad compared to Android devices compels them to occasionally use their browser to justify the purchase price in their minds.

Your assertion that iOS dominates high-end handsets doesn't make sense when you consider that sales of just a single model high-end Android phone (the Galaxy S3) come close to the iPhone.


"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki