Apple Aims to Tack on Galaxy Note II and 5 Other Products to Existing Lawsuit
November 26, 2012 2:05 PM
comment(s) - last by
Addition would put almost Samsung's entire current lineup in jeopardy
a 10-year licensing agreement
with HTC Corp. (
-- and with two-way lawsuits with Motorola Mobility dismissed with prejudice
but three times
-- the war between Apple, Inc. (
) and Android hinges on
one final battle
. That battle is the ongoing litigation between Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and Apple, the two
I. Ban on the Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III?
that Apple has filed to tack on six new Samsung products to its second major court battle with Samsung. Among the products is the popular phone-cum-tablet, the
Galaxy Note II
. Apple also wants to tack on the 4.8-inch
Samsung Galaxy S III
, running the new Android "Jelly Bean" operating system, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 Wi-Fi, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, the Samsung Rugby Pro, and the
Samsung Galaxy S III Mini
Judge Paul S. Grewal
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
's San Jose courtroom ruled that Samsung could
add Apple's flagship
to the suit. He also ruled that Apple
could add a number of Samsung products
to their suit.
At first it appeared that the Galaxy S III -- Samsung's flagship phone-form-factor device -- might be on that list. Now it appears Apple is still fighting to get that one tacked on.
The Galaxy Note II is among the devices targeted by Apple's latest ban request.
Last week, despite Judge Grewal expressing skepticism of Samsung's justifications, he handed the Asian OEM a key win, ordering that Apple
copies of its licensing agreement with HTC. However, the disclosure is under
a strict seal of privacy
meaning the media will not be privy to it.
II. War Continues Even as Both Sides Look to Shift Last Round in Their Favor
Apple alleges that Google Inc.'s (
Jelly Bean operating system
, along with Samsung's proprietary user interface enhancements illegally borrow patented technologies from iOS -- mostly in terms of designs, animations, or software mechanisms. Apple has stirred up controversy by patenting a number of its features in iOS; most recently it won
a design patent on animating turning pages
, despite Hewlett-Packard Comp. (
) offering a visually identical technology in 2002 (which is
), prior to Apple's filing.
Samsung, meanwhile, alleges that Apple refuses to license and stole its communications and video standards patents, along with a handful of user interface patents. Samsung's claims have also sparked controversy, as some argue it should be required to license those patents to Apple and should not be allowed to use them to pursue litigation against Apple, under the so-called "
fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory
" (FRAND) licensing rules that govern such standards patents.
Whichever side you are on, it's hard to deny that the first round when entirely to Apple. Apple scored
a $1.05B USD verdict
in the first jury trial, while it was found innocent of all of Samsung's counter-claims.
The verdict in the first trial cost Samsung $12B USD in value.
Samsung feels that victory was unjust and
. It believes the jury foreman -- who did not disclose his involvement in a prior legal dispute with a Samsung subsidiary -- misled fellow jurors. It has also questioned potential
Judge Lucy Koh
allowed some jurors to serve who had family members who held significant amounts of Apple stock and would profit off Samsung's misfortune. Judge Koh reasoned that this was okay, as the jurors themselves were not shareholders.
Apple meanwhile is looking to capitalize. While its push to ban Samsung's product from U.S. sales
has been stymied
by some of its key patents in the case being
engaged in various stages of invalidation
, it has moved to make the best of its win by looking to
triple the damages to $3.15B USD
. Apple could potentially triple the damages as the jury found the infringement to be "willful".
Overseas Apple has fared worse; in the UK
Apple lost a major case
to Samsung and was forced to
print an apology ad
. In South Korea, Samsung's home nation, Apple was
found guilty of minor infringements
, as was Apple. So far the U.S. verdict is somewhat of a red herring amidst the general international legal community, which has -- by and large -- pushed the pair to solve their differences via some manner of cross-licensing deal, rather than by wasting court time and requesting consumers be denied access to products.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Denying customers choice.
11/26/2012 4:03:13 PM
Does not mean they will buy your product.
I wonder how long the shareholders are going to put with Apple giving money to their lawyers rather than to them.
RE: Denying customers choice.
11/26/2012 5:01:45 PM
You're going to need something a lot stronger. Like some Wake-Up Juice.
"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook
Calif. Judge Orders Apple to Share Details of HTC Settlement with Samsung
November 22, 2012, 10:50 AM
Google v. Microsoft Lawsuits Wrap Up Under Cloak of Secrecy
November 21, 2012, 4:24 PM
HTC Slams Rumors, Hints Apple is Getting Less Than Half Microsoft's Licensing Fee
November 20, 2012, 9:04 AM
Apple Patents Turning Book Pages (Digitally)
November 19, 2012, 10:59 AM
Apple Allowed to Pursue Jelly Bean, Galaxy S III Ban, Samsung Can Target iPhone 5
November 16, 2012, 12:15 PM
New Reversible "Type-C" USB Plug Coming in Mid-2014
December 4, 2013, 10:38 AM
IDC Reports PC Shipments Will Decline by Double Digits in 2013
December 4, 2013, 10:18 AM
Canon EOS M2 Digital Camera Unveiled In Japan
December 3, 2013, 11:10 AM
Applebee's to Place Tablets at Each Table for Paying the Check, Ordering Food
December 3, 2013, 10:01 AM
Quick Note: Sony PS4 Sells 2.1 Million Units
December 3, 2013, 8:16 AM
UK iPhone Sales Show 5S Preference by Three-to-One Over 5C
December 2, 2013, 10:55 AM
Most Popular Articles
NSA Snares Americans' Porn Viewing Histories in Effort to Target Muslims
December 1, 2013, 9:00 PM
Coalition of 20+ Tech Firms Backs MRAM as Potential DRAM, NAND Replacement
November 29, 2013, 11:59 PM
Fed Up With Cheating OEMs, Microsoft Trolls Chromebooks in New Ad
November 27, 2013, 4:09 PM
Xbox? PCs? Mobile? Microsoft Wants One Windows to Rule Them All
November 25, 2013, 8:21 PM
Seattle Restaurant Bans Google Glass, Tells Wearers to "Just shut up and get out"
November 27, 2013, 10:27 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
AT&T Explores $100B+ USD Deal to Acquire Vodafone's European Operations
Nov 4, 2013, 7:34 AM
U.S. Army Developing Cyber, Electronic War Arsenal
Oct 31, 2013, 4:49 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information