backtop


Print 49 comment(s) - last by TakinYourPoint.. on Nov 28 at 6:44 PM


Senator Patrick Leahy (D, Vt.), seen here in a cameo in The Dark Knight, was "pressured" by National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association to change the language of the privacy bill  (Source: Warner Bros.)
Bill originally added protection for e-mail

Talk about a bait and switch. CNET is reporting that Senator Patrick Leahy (D, Vt.), who is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has revised legislation he proposed previously that originally claimed to protect e-mail privacy of American citizens. That proposal has been rewritten, and now allows for law enforcement officials to read your e-mails without a warrant.

The bill is scheduled for a vote next week and was reworked after the National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association made it clear that they were concerned about increasing difficulty gaining access to e-mails for criminal investigations. The rewritten bill would give access to e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter messages to 22 different government agencies without the need for a search warrant.
 
The rewritten bill would also allow the FBI and Homeland Security additional authority in certain circumstances to access accounts on the internet without notifying the owner or needing approval by a judge.

The original legislation proposed would've required police to obtain a search warrant and have probable cause before they were allowed to read the contents of e-mail or other digital communications.
 
Senator Leahy previously said of his legislation, "[The bill] provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by... requiring that the government obtain a search warrant."

Source: CNET



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No
By inperfectdarkness on 11/21/2012 2:33:02 AM , Rating: 2
The fact that legislation such as this is even under consideration speaks to how detached our elected officials are from reality, the constitution, and the wants/needs of the constituents that elected them.

I am very, very close to the point of reverting all personal business I conduct to face-face transactions only. Even "snail-mail" would probably be an improvement as warrants are still required to search the USPS (under most circumstances). Phone calls are easily tapped without warrant. Texts are virtually the same. Emails, skype, etc...all subject warrantless search now-a-days.

I hate having to live in the stone-age, but if I have to speak in-person to have any kind of hope for privacy (which isn't a guarantee with all the cameras and crap everywhere these days); and if I have to carry paper-money so that I have a prayer of not leaving a trace behind me...then I will do it.

It's shocking and disgusting that the kinds of information that can be gathered on individuals today would be blatantly inadmissable in a court of 20-30 years ago. And yet, we keep marching directly towards our "Minority Report" future.

While I myself am prepared to support and defend the constitution against domestic enemies...I am left to ponder why the Judicial system has failed such an epic and dramatic fashion in this regard.


"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki