Print 28 comment(s) - last by maugrimtr.. on Nov 20 at 8:05 AM

Open-source software groups are angry atone German city's claims

The German city of Freiburg has been using OpenOffice 3.2.1, which is an open-source productivity suite that is used as an alternative to Microsoft Office, for the past five years. The city has announced that it plans to ditch the open-source office suite and return to Microsoft Office after running into numerous problems.

Some of the issues cited by the city council include documents that were improperly formatted when opened in another office suite and conversion problems between presentation programs PowerPoint and Impress. The Council also felt that Calc and Impress performed significantly more poorly than Microsoft alternatives.

"The divergence of the development community (LibreOffice on one hand Apache Office on the other) is crippling for the development for OpenOffice," the council wrote.

The Free Software Foundation Europe, the Document Foundation, and the Open Source Business Alliance protested the city Council's findings. The groups said that the city Council was comparing apples to oranges.

"Numerous statements concerning LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice are incorrect or outdated," the groups said in the letter. They also added that the support of LibreOffice and OpenOffice is at a professional level these days. The group continued saying, "The assessment of the evaluation that compatibility to Microsoft Office cannot be reached in the next few years, is also wrong."

It's worth noting that while Microsoft Office 2013 hit RTM status in October, Freiburg will be using a combination of Office 2000 and Office 2010. 


Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: How cute
By bobsmith1492 on 11/19/2012 11:07:18 AM , Rating: 5
With Open Office at home and Microsoft Office at work I can attest to the much higher quality of Microsoft's product. You do get what you pay for.

RE: How cute
By StevoLincolnite on 11/19/2012 11:21:26 AM , Rating: 2
You do get what you pay for.

So with Open Office you get nothing? :P

RE: How cute
By Sivar on 11/19/2012 11:36:31 AM , Rating: 5
Higher quality indeed. I've used OpenOffice since the project began from StarOffice and while I've always felt it was okay, even as a long-time Open Source / Linux user, no honest, reasonable person can conclude that Microsoft Office isn't faster, easier to use, and far less buggy.

RE: How cute
By kmmatney on 11/19/2012 1:07:45 PM , Rating: 2
I tried using OpenOffice at Home, but finally just bought a 3-copy Home/Student edition of Office 2007 a while back. While there are a few things that bug me about office 2007, it is still far superior to OpenOffice. It took them far to long to support the OOXML formats as well.

RE: How cute
By Samus on 11/19/2012 2:00:57 PM , Rating: 2
The problem is the retail price of MSO (and Office Live subscriptions) is ridiculous.

The student license is really good, though.

But your average consumer that doesn't purchase it prebundled with a PC (Dell discounts Office Home & Business to $150, opposed to $250 retail) is going to simply pirate it. And with no OGA program, they'll get away with it.

RE: How cute
By Labotomizer on 11/19/2012 3:41:27 PM , Rating: 2
It's not as expensive as you think. It's around $150, so about $50/computer. I'm not sure how that's expensive. Business pays more but they also tend ot overpurchase. "We need Pro" is a common statement yet the user will never launch Access or Publisher. Understanding the right product for the right situation is the key to being a smart consumer, and that goes for everything, not just office.

RE: How cute
By augiem on 11/19/2012 6:04:25 PM , Rating: 2
Couple that with the fact that most people will be using it for at least 5 years and most businesses and schools probably 20 years. Cost over the lifetime is insignificant. People have got to stop having this attitude that software and electronic goods should be next to free. It takes a tremendous amount of work to create these things and the guys who make them deserve to be paid.

RE: How cute
By augiem on 11/19/2012 2:01:28 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. Open source advocates always seem to wear rose-colored glasses. Free software is great, but 9.9 times out of 10 I'm sorely disappointed by the results year after year. And don't even get me started on the nightmare of open-source web content management systems...

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
Related Articles
Microsoft Office 2013 Hits RTM Status
October 12, 2012, 9:00 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki