Apple Allowed to Pursue Jelly Bean, Galaxy S III Ban, Samsung Can Target iPhone 5
November 16, 2012 12:15 PM
comment(s) - last by
Got to ban them all
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
's San Jose courtroom
Judge Paul S. Grewal
has ordered that warring smartphone makers Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and Apple, Inc. (
) be allowed to dramatically expand their lawsuits by including nearly all of each others current product.
I. Round Two Set, With iPhone 5 and Galaxy S III Ban Requests Added
Round one of the battle in California U.S. District Court when resoundingly to Apple. Initially,
Judge Lucy Koh
moved to dismiss the case, but in a somewhat unusual outcome a three-judge panel at the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
[PDF] Judge Koh to reconsider tossing the case. Judge Koh subsequently allowed Apple to take Samsung to trial, and in a stunning outcome the jury -- some of whose family members were Apple shareholders -- found Samsung
guilty of $1.05B USD
in damages. Apple was found innocent of Samsung's infringement claims.
In the wake of that stinging ruling Apple looked to capitalizing, looking to
triple the damages to $3B USD
on the grounds that the jury found the infringement to be "willful" and non unintentional.
The Samsung Galaxy S III
But that round of the battle, which is still ongoing, only deals with last generation devices. A second, newer case was filed by Apple in February target the Galaxy Nexus (which at the time was one of Samsung's flagship designs). Apple alleged that the Nexus infringed on eight of its patents. Samsung, as with the previous suit, filed a counter-claim, alleging the iPad infringed on eight of its own patents.
In recent weeks both companies have looked to pile on new claims to that second suit, asking Judge Grewal to refresh it to contain their rival's current products.
The iPhone 5
Samsung asked to
add the iPhone 5
to the case and have the jury rule on new infringement claims. Apple sought
a far bigger expansion
, adding a general claim covering all devices running Google Inc.'s (
Jelly Bean operating system
(which in turn covers 17 stylus based products) and the
Samsung Galaxy S III
, Samsung flagship phone. Samsung balked at Apple's request arguing that it covered far many products.
Ultimately Judge Grewal
with Apple's claim that it was valid to tack on a broad range of devices, despite the time involved, although he did offer Samsung a bit of good news by approving its iPhone 5 addition to the counterclaim.
II. Smartphone War Has Mostly Been a Stalemate
So far the smartphone between Apple and Android smartphone makers has been largely a stalemate, thus far. Apple did dent HTC Corp.'s (
) sales with
a month long seizure of shipments
, but it ultimately settled up with Android phonemaker into
a long-term IP licensing deal
failing to secure more bans
Technically, Google-owned Android phonemaker subsidiary Motorola Mobility and Apple are still at war, but their case has gone nowhere. The pair's suits/countersuits have been dismissed with prejudice
but three times
from different federal courts.
As for Samsung v. Apple, despite the big jury loss, virtually no Samsung products have been banned from sale. Judge Koh recently struck down
the ban on the Galaxy Tab 10.1
(the precursor to the Note 10.1), as the jury found it did not infringe on
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
, a design patent which depicted a bulkier button-less early iteration of the iPad, nicknamed by some the "fat iPad".
Many Android smartphones have escaped Apple's ban hopes.
While Judge Koh did acknowledge that the Tab 10.1 was found to infringe on Apple user interface patents, she argued that was insufficient to ban the handsets.
Judge Koh had put in place a preliminary injunction on the Galaxy Nexus, pending the outcome of the second trial
back in June
. But in early October the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
that ban as well, arguing that Apple's arguments regarding Samsung's supposed infringements were flawed and demonstrated a lack of understanding about the workings of Android.
While the $1B USD jury verdict was a blow for Samsung, considering the company is pulling in
a cool profit of $7.4B USD
per quarter, the impact shouldn't be too big, even if it holds up on appeal.
III. Samsung May be Forced to Pay More, But Bans are Unlikely
The Apple versus Samsung conflict, the last of the major lawsuit battles to appear to have some life left, also happens to be the most pivotal for both Android and Apple. Samsung is by far the biggest smartphone maker, and is ahead of Apple in unit sales. It is also the only smartphone maker to common anywhere close to Apple's gawdy margins (though it still makes much less profit).
The most wild outcome, with the additions would be for the nation's two best-selling phonemakers to have all their current product banned from sale. (An outcome that would surely please some like HTC and Nokia Oyj. (
More likely there will be few if any bans, based on past cases. But the time-consuming case may lead to another billion dollar verdict.
In the last some jurors had family members who were Apple shareholders.
[Image Source: SomanyMP3s]
Apple has a distinct advantage in that the case is being tried in a local court, with jurors selected from a relatively affluent region, where many people are either Apple shareholders or have family members who hold Apple stock. Judge Koh in the previous case said it would be fine for jurors to have family members with large amounts of Apple stock, as she did not see that as an unacceptable bias.
Amidst that outcome, the most likely outcome may be that Samsung is forced to pay another "licensing fee" sort of sorts -- a billion dollard dent -- but is unlikely to see substantial product bans, given Apple's unwillingness to license Samsung patents covering relatively
trivial and ubiquitous software features
(some of which are in the early stages of invalidation) or design features (like the rectangle).
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
11/19/2012 11:23:54 AM
Calling for faith in your country and calling greece "grease" in the previous sentance, even though the messsage you're replying to has the word "greeks" in them (so how did you reason that A in there?), kinda raises an eyebrow over here.
Truth is, the USA of today and greece aren't all that different. There's massive tax evasion which is part of the culture - anybody with any money in both countries does so to the best of their abilities, while the middle-class (aka the general population) in both countries gets screwed over.
There's a massive state debt to GDP which has no means of being resoved in both countries. Don't forget, greece is actually pushing through austerity while the US is not. Once the US does push through the neccesary austerity - which means cutting social security and medicare since your mandatory expendatures are higher then total tax revenue - do you really think there won't be protests, strikes and demonstrations like in greece?
The politicians in both countries are totally corrupt, and i wouldn't call it any more obvious in any of the 2 countries. Knowing that obama and romney both spent $2 billion dollars between them, and the total expendatures of senators and such added $7 billion was spent to get elected. You do realise the GDP of Haiti is $7,3 billion? When politicians start spending more then the GDP of small nations just to get elected, you can no longer speak of no bias in any of em.
There might be cultural differences. But there's little difference when it comes to politics or finance. The only differences i can think of is that greece is already over the hill while the US is coming over the top, and that the US hill is much, much higher then the greek hill. Curtesy of a ~$600
derivatives market, the vast majority of which held by US banks like JP morgan, goldman sachs, etc.
Do you really want to take pride in that? Or have faith in it? Or do something about it?
"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Apple and HTC Organize a Truce, Sign 10-Year Licensing Pact
November 11, 2012, 3:31 PM
Apple Looks to Ruin Google's Jelly Bean Party With More Lawsuits
November 7, 2012, 5:38 PM
Wisconsin Judge Kicks Apple v. Google Out of Federal Court for a Third Time
November 6, 2012, 5:38 PM
Samsung Reports $7.4 Billion Profit, Sells 56.3 Million Phones
October 26, 2012, 5:04 PM
USPTO Makes Preliminary Move to Kill Apple's Rubber Band Patent
October 24, 2012, 11:00 AM
HTC One Hits 5 Million Sales in First Month, Despite Issues
May 23, 2013, 4:04 PM
HTC First's Arrival in UK Canceled, Facebook Assesses "Home" Feedback
May 23, 2013, 3:02 PM
Microsoft Expands Windows Azure in Asia, Mocks iPad in New Commercial
May 23, 2013, 12:06 PM
Lenovo Reports Solid Fiscal Q4, Full-Year Financials
May 23, 2013, 9:22 AM
MSI's AMD Richland (A10)/Neptune (7/8xxxM) Gaming Notebooks Start at $1,299 USD
May 22, 2013, 3:15 PM
Apples Tries to Use Decade-Old Patents to Ban Samsung Galaxy S IV
May 22, 2013, 3:00 PM
Most Popular Articles
High School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds
May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM
NASA Awards $125,000 Grant for 3D Printed Food on Long-Term Space Travels
May 21, 2013, 1:32 PM
Seawater Cooling Saves Data Center Big Bucks, Energy, Despite Jellyfish Issues
May 17, 2013, 3:23 PM
Microsoft Announces Voice-Controlled "Xbox One"
May 21, 2013, 12:55 AM
EA Dev: Nintendo is "the Walking Dead"; Wii U is "Crap"
May 20, 2013, 11:27 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Lumosity: Does it Work?
May 22, 2013, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Sony "Teases" PS4 Ahead of Xbox Reveal in New Video
May 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Nokia Introduces Instagram-Like App of Its Own to Help Lumia Sales
May 20, 2013, 7:10 AM
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information