NTSB Wants New Safety Systems in All Vehicles to Reduce Distracted Driving Deaths
November 15, 2012 8:49 AM
comment(s) - last by
Stupid is as stupid does...
A large number of deaths are attributed each year to
in the United States. Many drivers are too busy texting, making phone calls, or reading (among other things) while driving their cars. If you listen to some people in Washington, the answer to fixing such driving stupidity are even more safety mandates.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) wants collision-avoidance technology such as forward-collision and lane-departure warning systems, adaptive cruise control, and automatic braking on every car sold in the U.S. These technologies are already available as options on many luxury cars currently on the market.
The problem on the consumer end of things is that these safety features are included in options packages that add $1,000 or more to the price of the vehicle. Automotive manufacturers oppose the NTSB because the added costs would spread to even the most basic automobiles on the market instead of being relegated to more expensive vehicles where buyers are more willing to fork over the money.
However, the NTSB believes that this sort of technology can help drivers improve reaction times and avoid crashes.
According to the NHTSA, systems such as the ones it's recommending would make a significant impact on reducing the number of accidents caused by distracted drivers. Accidents caused by distracted drivers account for 60% of highway fatalities.
"We have a chance to take a big bite into that figure," NTSB board member Robert Sumwalt said.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Automatic Braking
Dr of crap
Dr of crap
11/15/2012 3:37:33 PM
I have my cruise set and I'm trying to use the least amount of gas and NOT use my brakes so that the cars behind think they have to brake as well. Causes a slow down for no reason. You see I DO CONSIDER the other drivers around me!
It is not UP to me to let the jerk in. He should have forseen the problem not waited until the very end.
I will not slam on, or use my brakes to let someone get in front of me in my lane if there is no reason for it.
You sould like one of the ones I hate that brake to let mearging traffic in. The WRONG thing to do, and has become the norm, and pisses off a LOT OF DRIVERS including myself.
Letting the guy in is just as bad as tailgating and last minute lane changes. Causes slow downs and then the guy 20 cars back seees brake lights, sees there's no reason for it gets mad and floors it around the slow down. A potention accident waiting to happen. EVERY driver has the ability to inflict an accident in the mass of cars on the road. Guess you can't se that!
RE: Automatic Braking
11/15/2012 4:48:28 PM
I don't mind letting people in front of me usually. The ones that really get me hot are the ones that will pass me like I am sitting still then 100 yards ahead slam on the breaks and make a right hand turn! They could have just as easily slowed down behind and waited maybe two seconds more and made the turn with out having to make me slam on the brakes to avoid hitting them as they cut in front of me to turn.
The other people that irk me to no end are the ones where when you see a sign for road construction that clearly says, "One lane road ahead, merge now" and they run up beside a long line of vehicles and try to get people to let them in.
RE: Automatic Braking
11/16/2012 12:26:24 PM
I agree, but im old age have learned to back off more, as I do not go over the speed limit for the most part, and typically leave extra room in front of me (3-4 seconds) for the idiots that feel it is daytona instead of a shared roadway.
As for the construction, some states have figured out a nice solution to this. I used to live in minnesota and they instituted the "zipper merge" several years ago, telling everybody to fill in both lanes when it is going down to one until the end, then take turns. This takes away the opportunity for the aholes to run up ahead of everybody, and actually keeps traffic flowing much better through those zones.
“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
Kodak Files Motion to Clear Way for Competitive Auction of Patents
June 12, 2012, 9:00 AM
Hot Air? President Obama, G7 Pledge to Eliminate Most Fossil Fuel Use by 2100
June 8, 2015, 5:40 PM
Study Predicts Self-Driving Vehicles Could Rake in Billions
March 6, 2015, 8:34 AM
Dual-Motor Tesla Model S P85D's "Insane Mode" Shocks Passengers
January 28, 2015, 11:18 PM
2016 Cadillac CTS-V Packs 640 hp Punch with 200 mph Reach
January 23, 2015, 3:25 PM
BMW Testing Tech to Allow Users to Auto-Park, Summon Cars Via Smartwatch
December 16, 2014, 9:30 AM
Lamborghini Offers Up $6,000 Leather-Bound Android Smartphone
December 12, 2014, 3:12 PM
Most Popular Articles
F-16 Schools Trillion-Dollar F-35 in Mock Combat, Fleeing is Best Option Pilot Admits
July 1, 2015, 5:53 PM
Apple Music: The Money, The Launch Hiccups, and the Nitty Gritty Details
June 30, 2015, 5:09 PM
Apple iOS 8.4 Rolls Out w/ Fix to Crash-Causing Unicode Text
June 30, 2015, 3:24 PM
Windows XP, Vista Users Can Get Free Windows 10 Upgrade Thanks to Loophole
June 23, 2015, 2:23 PM
Quick Note: Lumia 940 XL "Cityman" Phablet Gets Teased Via Tests
June 29, 2015, 5:51 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information