USAF Concedes $1B USD Data Project Was Pretty Much Useless
November 15, 2012 4:55 PM
comment(s) - last by
"[ERP] has not yielded any significant military capability" -- USAF spokesperson
Hot on the heels of
where the two presidential candidates were deeply divided on the issue of military budget cuts comes word that one of the Armed Forces' most costly and ambitious data projects has been scrapped.
I. Money Down the Drain
Dubbed the "Expeditionary Combat Support System" (ECSS), the project involved enterprise resource planning" (ERP). ERP refers to efforts to merge external and internal data flows, such as expenses, manufacturing metrics, logistics, contractor relationships, and unified messaging into a single flow of data.
ERP is an ambitious challenge being tackled by International Business Machines, Inc. (
), Google Inc. (
), and a handful of other top players in the data-mining sector.
The U.S. Air Force
(USAF) looked to join that select crowd with ECSS and poured a lot of money into the effort -- $1.03B USD since 2005. But five years later an cool billion out of the pocket, and a USAF spokesperson's diagnosis of the project's health is:
[ECSS] has not yielded any significant military capability. We estimate it would require an additional $1.1B for about a quarter of the original scope to continue and fielding would not be until 2020. The Air Force has concluded the ECSS program is no longer a viable option for meeting the FY17 Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) statutory requirement. Therefore, we are cancelling the program and moving forward with other options in order to meet both requirements.
USAF has terminated a $1B+ USD data project, and now may lose up to $15.5B USD in savings that the project would have realized by eliminating redundant parts. [Image Source: Unknown]
In other words, a project that was supposed to cost a relatively hefty $1B USD, ballooned in costs to a problem which USAF think would require at least $8B USD to solve and nearly two decades from the start of the project to deploy.
II. Contractors Offer Little Explanation, Reap New Contracts
In light of that dose of reality USAF has decided to scrap the entire project altogether and start over,
in a statement, "[The funding] will be better served by developing an entirely new strategy versus revamping the ECSS system of record again."
The aforementioned 2017 audit will now have to be run with a slightly tweaked version of the USAF's legacy software set, which dates back to pre-2005 and pre-ECSS. Comments USAF, "[We will use] existing and modified logistics systems for 2017 audit compliance."
Top contractors like the Computer Sciences Corp. (CSC) offered no explanation as to why the project failed. [Image Source: Interbrand]
The failed project may have been a big loss for USAF and U.S. taxpayers, but it was a big win for certain well-paid contractors. Oracle Corp. (
) scored $88.5M USD for the preliminary work on the project, which it promised would merge 200 partially redundant USAF systems.
Computer Sciences Corp. (
) then took over scoring, most of the remaining billion in funding to serve as lead systems integrator. In a response after being fired last year a CSC spokeswoman was unapologetic,
, "CSC demonstrated success in meeting all the major milestones and commitments for the first four years."
In other words, things were going great (or so the contractor says) the first four years, but then on the fifth year something inexplicably went wrong which the contractor was not at liberty to discuss or did not feel was important to discuss.
Perhaps it's understandable why CSC wouldn't feel overly obligated to give a big explanation of why it failed, given that USAF has shown little signs of punishing it for the failure. In fact CSC's baffling 2011 report on ECSS didn't stop it from scoring
at least one other major cybersecurity service contract
from USAF that year. That contract was worth another $30M USD.
III. 2017 Will Bring a Fresh Look at the Mess
The big issue is that the USAF now has to try to find ways to improve legacy software that have led to major waste. The problem is somewhat exponential. USAF has an
inventory of $31B USD in parts
, of which about half are thought to be redundant and unneeded. In other words the $1B USD failure could in turn lead USAF to be unable to cut an additional $15.5B USD in waste, which it was expected to do during the 2017 audit.
Michael Krigsman, CEO of consulting firm Asuret and expert on big IT failures was stinging in his analysis. He comments, "This situation raises more questions than answers. Why did it take the [Air Force] $1 billion and almost 10 years to realize this project is a disaster? What kind of planning process accepts a billion dollars of waste? How can they achieve such [an audit] goal when this program is cancelled?"
He expects "many excuses" come 2017 of why the audit failed, and the $15.5B USD in wasted parts linger around, continuing to accumulate.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: What a bunch of TAKERS
11/16/2012 10:01:31 AM
zero accountability, zero results
Come on. You know it's not as simple as "CSC didn't do their job!". I'm sure the requirements were changing almost daily basis. Feature creep was probably insane. They may have been doing exactly what they were asked to do.
Basically, I'm not saying this situation was acceptable (or that CSC should have no blame), but I AM saying that laying all the blame on the contractors is probably not painting a realistic picture of what happened here. The contractors are not in charge of the projects.
In fact, I feel like it's pretty reasonable to lay the blame primarily on the Air Force. If nothing else, they hired these guys and kept paying them for 7ish years.
Good song, though!
"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot
Fairweather Friends "Unlike" Romney on Facebook
November 13, 2012, 9:13 AM
U.S. GOA: 40 Percent of Defense Supply Chain Damaged by Chinese Parts
June 17, 2011, 2:00 PM
Nail Polish May Soon be Able to Detect Date Rape Drugs
August 26, 2014, 7:57 AM
SpaceX Falcon 9-R Rocket Suffers Malfunction, Self-Destructs During Test Flight
August 23, 2014, 9:36 AM
Texas Chosen as Site for SpaceX's First Commercial Launchpad
August 5, 2014, 1:44 PM
South Carolina Prison Finds Crashed Drone Carrying Drugs, Phones
August 1, 2014, 2:49 PM
NASA's Mars 2020 Rover Gains Seven New Instruments for Exploration
August 1, 2014, 1:30 PM
NASA Opportunity Rover Breaks Record for Most Miles Traveled on Another Planet
July 29, 2014, 1:38 PM
Most Popular Articles
New Photos Show “Assembled” iPhone 6, Protruding Camera Ring
August 20, 2014, 2:32 PM
Leaked Qualcomm Roadmap: 20 nm 64-bit Octacore Smartphone SoCs Cometh
August 20, 2014, 11:38 AM
Microsoft's Surface 2 Tablet Family Gets a $100 Price Cut
August 25, 2014, 1:16 AM
Report: Microsoft to Announce Windows 9 on September 30
August 21, 2014, 11:20 AM
From HULC to FORTIS: the Evolution of Lockheed Martin's Incredible Exosuit
August 22, 2014, 12:45 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information