Print 51 comment(s) - last by tng.. on Nov 21 at 10:40 AM

  (Source: Getty Images)
"We'll tell you next month" is the likely word from the EPA

Stop me if you've heard this one before.  It's the eleventh hour and the Obama administration is facing a crucial decision, one that could have a deep impact on the nation's economy and a united voice of experts is facing noisy opposition from special interests.  It's game time and the administration is on the field, ready to make the big play... and they instead choose to punt.

That's the likely scenario according to The Detroit News regarding ethanol waivers, a decision which was supposed to be made this week by Obama's iteration of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

I. Federal Government Backs Corn Ethanol Despite Massive Drawbacks

The EPA derives its power to regulated fuel economy from the Clean Air Act of 1963 [PDF], a law which was most recently amended in 1990 by Congress.  A key question in recent years is whether the EPA can dictate what fuels the market should sell or blend.  The last two Presidents -- Barack Obama and George W. Bush -- argued the answer to that question is "yes".  The most crucial effort to that objective was the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), signed into law by President Bush.

Under the EISA, which has been actively backed by President Obama, each year gasoline sellers in the U.S. must blend in more and more ethanol to help the U.S. meet "targets".

pumping fuel
President Bush and Obama have backed the federal government manipulating the economy to push corn ethanol at the pump. [Image Source: Nation Corn Growers Assoc.]
But despite its status as America's most used alternative fuel, serious questions surround ethanol and whether it really helps the environment at all.  While domestic ethanol production does offer a small shred of domestic security by removing some dependence on volatile foreign sources, studies have also shown that it actually increases greenhouse gas emissions and increases food prices.

In other words, the body of current evidence clearly points to corn ethanol -- the most abundant form of ethanol in the U.S. -- being bad news for both the U.S. consumer and the environment.

Automakers also say that higher blends of ethanol will damage the engines of older vehicles, in turn creating both economic problems.  The EPA dubiously says it knows the science better than the people who made the vehicles, arguing that the automakers are liars.

Obama bribery wide
Obama and Bush both backed big corn special interests. [Image Source: Politically Incorrect]

In the midst of all the issues, why is there still a modicum of support for government manipulation of the fuel market in corn ethanol's favor?

Big corn has long been one of the nation's most powerful special interest.  Corn farmers have benefited from billions in yearly government subsidies, with a major chunk of it coming from ethanol grants and mandates.  In total, corn farmers drew $73.8B USD from 1995-2009 from the U.S. federal and state governments.

II. Big Corn v. Everyone Else

Indeed the latest debate regarding ethanol comes down to "corn farmers" vs. "everyone else" -- including their fellow farmers.

Amidst a record drought, feed prices are soaring.  Livestock farmers have resorted to feeding their cows candy to try to keep from going bankrupt or letting their herd die.  Meanwhile, corn is being actively fermented (or wasted, according to critics) into ethanol, putting further pressure on prices.  And the EPA's fine-backed blending demands are the key factor driving that trend.

Farm drought
Without intervention, record corn prices coupled with drought may push small farms out of business. [Image Source: US News]

The corn farmers argue that they can't release information showing what their yields are; information that could validate the desperate farmers claims.  Instead, their argument boils down to "just trust us", as they fight a potential EPA waiver to help the struggling farmers.

The Michigan Farm Bureau comments "[We don't believe keeping the blending targets] would severely harm the economy of Michigan at this time. We do not have final harvest numbers, making it premature to determine what our total crop supply will be in 2012."

Likewise The National Corn Growers Association writes [PDF], "We believe the burden of proof for severe harm to the economy falls on the petitioner. We believe the petitioners have failed to establish this proof, since higher feed prices are only one piece of a complicated economic puzzle."

III. Blending Targets May Kill Small Farmers' Businesses

On the other side stands a united group of farmers, state, and federal politicians.

Corn prices are up 60 percent on the year, and food prices are expected to rise 3.5 percent or more this year -- and more next year -- largely due to ethanol pressure.  Corn prices have jumped 400 percent since the federal government backed corn ethanol under the Bush administration.

Eight state governors and 200 members of Congress have written a letter (on behalf of the slightly ironically named National Pork Producers Council) to the EPA pleading with it to relax blending rules via a waiver, at least for the rest of the year.  Delaware and Maryland's governors write that without a waiver the EPA would be creating "the loss of thousands jobs."

A number or researchers also signed a letter calling for a waiver.  Among them is John M. DeCicco and Ivette Perfecto from the University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment.  They write, "The (Renewable Fuel Standard) diverts potential food crops to produce fuel, which drives up food price volatility and global food prices."

corn profits
Big corn donates deeply to federal politiicans, who in turn reward it with billions in subsidies.
[Image Source:]

It would be awfully hard for the Obama administration's EPA to deny the waiver in the midst of such overwhelming support.  On the other hand, it would be equally hard to turn their back on big corn special interests.  Those affiliated with the National Corn Growers Assoc. alone poured close to $500,000 USD to candidates on both sides of the aisle in 2012 [source] (the majority went to Republicans, likely due to their more critical stance on ethanol, which big corn hoped to soften).

IV. Silence From the EPA

The EPA released a brief comment remarking, "EPA is completing its review and analysis of the RFS waiver requests and the agency plans to reach a decision shortly."

But Tuesday's deadline for a decision came and went without any word about the status.

Punting a football
The EPA appears ready to punt on the waiver. [Image Source: How to Punt a Football]
Late last year Congress finalized the cut to corn ethanol's tax subsidy.  But the influx of money from big corn has some on The Hill calling for a renewal of an effort to force corn ethanol on the consumer, regardless the cost to the economy and the environment.

Amidst that backdrop, the only noise coming from the EPA is the sound of crickets as the waiver requests are punted deeper downfield.

Sources: The Detroit News, Fox News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Face punches for all
By TheJian on 11/15/2012 9:49:47 AM , Rating: 3
ROFL...So if cows have no food they die right? I eat meat, so less to go around means my bills go up right?

You make no sense, just like all EPA people. The need for the epa has past. They are just screwing us now for their own agenda.

51% of the country voted for this fool who can't do anything but vote PRESENT still. You should have voted this A$$ out, and romney would have promptly dismantled the wasteful EPA and drilled the hell out of america. You got what you asked for, get ready for the bills people. The only people who are going to get richer here, is obama's friends and himself. The rest of us (including the rich who create all the jobs to begin with) will be paying for him and his friends. Saul Alinksy's rules for radicals at work. You should have expected nothing less from someone who worships this guy and others like him (frank marshall davis etc).

saul alinsky rules for radicals
Google that to read about this "Community Organizer" who taught obama how to fleece america ;) Your fellow bastard from...wait for it....CHICAGO ILLINOIS...

Who else worships this A$$?
"Hillary Clinton's senior honors thesis on Saul Alinsky, written at Wellesley College" ...You can google the rest... These two idiots (along with harry reid/pelosi) are destroying what is left of our country.
Or just look there for all the crap this guy did and his followers (clinton, obama etc, all loved him).

Wake up people. Instead of occupy wall street, do something useful and occupy the white house :) They both got 4 good people killed and now intend to blame it on a blackmailed petraues for having sex...LOL. Quit falling for their BS, both Obama and Holder knew about his affair long before they put him in place, just so they could use it later. You'll keep getting corn crap instead of drilling, solar instead of drilling, and dumb batteries until you un-elect/impeach or put in jail every person having anything to do with obama/clinton. Now he gets offered a cushy job at a college to shut up and fall on the sword. Our only hope is, Petraeus actually has the balls to speak up and get this fool impeached for getting 4 people killed. $10 says he takes the cushy job and doesn't testify (at the same college as Van Jones...Remember him? ROFL..So much corruption). You like steak? If obama punts and votes present agian, you'll all be eating less of it. My 2c :)

We don't need another source of fuel...We just need to DRILL and BURN what we have. It's called OIL and COAL. It's unbelievable how easy it is to get politicians to sell out. $500K in donations gets destruction of our economy and BILLIONS in subsidies?

RE: Face punches for all
By FITCamaro on 11/15/2012 12:57:33 PM , Rating: 2
Well you're supposed to stop eating meat because that's bad for you too just like everything else.

RE: Face punches for all
By tastyratz on 11/15/2012 2:14:28 PM , Rating: 2
Except corn BUY CORN EAT CORN have some corn syrup sweetened soda to wash it down and drench their corn flakes.

Corn is EVERYWHERE I am so sick of it.

The epa can shove all this corn talk right up their cornhole

RE: Face punches for all
By YashBudini on 11/15/2012 3:50:59 PM , Rating: 2
Well FIT, you got that urban myth wrong. Grass fed beef is perfectly fine, and ironically, it's corn fed beef that's the problem.

"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki