LHC Sends Supersymmetry "To the Hospital" By Observing Bizarre Meson Decay
November 12, 2012 10:09 PM
comment(s) - last by
Physicists may need new theories to explain how dark matter works
Supersymmetry, or SUSY for short, has been a popular physics theory used to explain away quirks in the Standard Model. But recent findings from
's Large Hadron Collider cast serious doubts on traditional SUSY theory, sending physicists back to the drawing board.
I. Dark Matter -- Does SUSY Offer an Explanation?
When it comes to SUSY, the theory began with a fundamental question -- why were galaxies spinning so fast?
Physicists in the 1900s began to predict the mass of galaxies based on the light of stars within. What they found was surprising -- the galaxies were spinning faster than they would be if merely adhering to a vanilla version of the Standard Model.
So physicists theorized that the galaxies contained large amounts of so-called "
". This type of matter is thought to behave in fundamentally different ways from standard matter. The question facing physicists was how
dark matter behave; physicists sought to solve that question with the theory of super-symmetry, a theory which grew increasingly popular in the particle physics world over the years, spawning several variants.
SUSY is a leading theory to explain the existence of dark matter. [Image Source: NASA]
Under one version of the theory -- the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model or MSSM for short -- physicists Howard Georgi (Harvard University) and Savas Dimopoulos (Stanford University) proposed that dark matter consisted of super-particles of masses between 100 GeV and 1 TeV.
The question was how to observe the presence or lack of these high-energy super-particles. At the time (the 1980s), no particle collider was powerful and sensitive enough to create and detect such pairs. Then the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) came along.
II. Signs Point to Many SUSY Models Being Flat-Out Wrong
While the LHC is best known for the
Higgs boson hunt
have observed signs
of this much-sought-after particle), the LHC is powerful enough to probe other major unconfirmed physics theories.
SUSY is a perfect example.
The LHC has seven built in particle detectors. These include flashy detectors like ATLAS and CMS, which have been used in the Higgs boson hunt.
Many popular version of SUSY predict that the "strange" B-meson -- a short-lived 0.5 TeV (in mass) particle that oscillates between a matter and antimater state -- will decay to muons at a far greater rate than the extremely low rate predicted by the vanilla Standard Model. The source of this shift stems from decay loops such as the chargino and Charged Higgs boson, which SUSY predicts [
] will enhance muon decay rates, by about an order of magnitude.
But it turns out the decay was not as frequent as SUSY expected.
Bs mu-mu decays occur less frequently than SUSY generally predicts. [Image Source: CERN]
Most detectors failed to observe that kind of decay at all. And when the LHCb detector finally did spot it, it estimated that only three out of every billion decay results in muon production.
III. Door Opens to New Theories
This at first blush seems an intuitive conclusion -- it would indeed seem odd that the mid-size meson would produce the relatively massive muons on a frequent basis. But the result does raise major questions -- if SUSY is wrong, what is dark matter made of?
An important thing to note is that while CERN physicists say the new data "squeezes" super-symmetry models, it does not say it invalidates all of them. For example the so-called AKM model -- theorized by professors Ambrosanio, Kane, Kribs, Martin and Mrenna -- appears to encompass the results in its fringe reaches.
As Prof. Chris Parkes
, "Supersymmetry may not be dead but these latest results have certainly put it into hospital."
The observation pushes SUSY to its fringes, raising questions of its validity.
[Image Source: CERN]
Even if the AKM model can accomodate the new results, the fact that they blow up many alternate SUSY models (most of which have over 100 fittable parameters) opens the door to fundamentally different solutions than SUSY to try to explain away symmetry violations.
In other words, the possible fall of SUSY sets the stage for a renaissance of new theory, the kind that equally delights physicists and gives the average member of the public at large a painful headache.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Dark matter is a poor basis to start a theory on
11/13/2012 5:29:00 PM
Full stop. SUSY was not proposed to solve the Dark Matter problem. SUSY was introduced to solve the Hierarchy problem, or essentially cancel out the quadratic divergences in the Higgs mass to protect the mass of the Higgs from higher energy physics. The Dark Matter candidates in SUSY come from trying to solve the Proton decay problem SUSY brings up. SUSY, without R parity, allows the decay of the Proton to be very large (~15 minutes) and so by introducing R parity this problem was solved. By introducing R parity it also happens to allow a natural description for Dark Matter because odd R parity particles cannot decay into even R parity particles, leading to a potentially stable neutral particle. The breaking of SUSY then allows these odd R parity neutral particles to become WIMPs, and thus potentially explain cosmological Dark Matter.
Now, if we are going to say there is no theoretical understanding of Dark Matter, then we are also going to say something that is flat out wrong. It is very easy to make a model with Dark Matter. Exceedingly easy. So much so that pretty much any given model of physics beyond that Standard Model can have additional Dark Matter particles inserted. For instance, you can make Dark Matter that also leads to Neutrino mass. You can also have Dark Matter from SUSY (coming from R parity), and then add on extra Dark Matter particles (as in other species of Dark Matter or just potential Dark Matter particles with the lightest mass particle of all candidates being the cosmological Dark Matter).
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
Elusive "God Particle" Believed to be Discovered by CERN's LHC
July 4, 2012, 3:30 PM
LHC Researchers Still Can't Find Higgs Boson, Settle for New "Chi" Particle
December 22, 2011, 7:30 PM
Scientists Find First Signs of Dark Matter at LHC
February 1, 2011, 1:45 PM
Smartphone STD Scanner Dongle Can Detect HIV in Just 15 Minutes
February 26, 2015, 11:04 AM
Bill Gates Plugs GMOs to Reduce Starvation in Africa
February 24, 2015, 10:12 PM
Cool Nature Video: Crazy Coconut Octopus Braves Dry Land to Capture Crab
February 24, 2015, 4:18 PM
MIT Creates Injectable Self-Healing Nanoparticle Hydrogel for Cancer Treatment
February 23, 2015, 9:37 AM
Amp EVs' Workhorse and HorseFly Duo Challenge Amazon to Delivery Drone Duel
February 20, 2015, 3:56 AM
DARPA Awards Boeing Contract to Test Jet Based Satellite Launches
February 19, 2015, 11:30 AM
Most Popular Articles
Modern Glass (Windows 7 Aero Glass + Modern UI) Style is Coming to Windows 10
February 19, 2015, 1:05 PM
Amid Tight Race w/ Evernote, Microsoft's OneNote Goes (Even More) Free, Adds Fresh Features
February 23, 2015, 11:15 AM
Google Steps up Snub of Adobe Flash, Auto-Converting Flash Ads to HTML5
February 25, 2015, 6:16 PM
NVIDIA Bows to Outraged Overclockers, Will Restore Feature in Upcoming Driver
February 23, 2015, 12:30 PM
HTC's Sense UI is Garbage: A Tale of Disappearing Keyboards and Desperate Fixes
February 24, 2015, 11:00 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information