Print 23 comment(s) - last by retrospooty.. on Nov 13 at 1:07 PM

The UK court made this call after Apple posted an inaccurate notice on its UK website

After posting a snarky notice on its UK website, Apple was ordered to pay a majority of Samsung's legal fees.

Last month, a UK court ruling ordered Apple to post a notice to Samsung on its website, saying that the South Korean electronics maker didn't steal the designs of the iPad after all. Apple obeyed the order, but with a snarky tone that made sure to highlight a few facts in Apple's favor.

The UK court found that this notice was "false and misleading," and ordered Apple to take it down at once. Apple was told to rewrite the apology to Samsung, and it posted a notice on its website saying that its former "apology" was inaccurate. The new apology even appeared in UK newspapers

However, a rewrite was not enough. The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has further ordered Apple to pay the legal fees of Samsung on an indemnity basis. The exact amount that Apple must pay is unclear, but reports are saying Apple will pay a majority of the fees. 

The Apple-Samsung patent war began in April 2011 when Apple claimed Samsung was an "iPhone, iPad copycat." Apple worked pretty hard to ban Samsung's smartphones and tablets around the world, and successfully accomplished this in countries like Germany and Australia. Samsung launched a few lawsuits of its own regarding 3G patents, and was also able to lift the ban on its Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia in December 2011. However, Samsung wasn't so lucky in Germany, where the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is still banned.

Back in August, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California reached an unfavorable verdict for Samsung, saying that the South Korean electronics maker was guilty of violating technology patents. In other words, most of Samsung's smartphones and tablets in question were found guilt of copying Apple's iPhone and iPad designs. It was ordered to pay $1.05 billion in damages to Apple.

Samsung suffered further losses in the U.S. when an ITC judge ruled that Samsung violated four Apple patents, including the flat front face with wider borders at the top and bottom, the lozenge-shaped speaker about the display screen; the translucent images for applications displayed on the screen, and the device's ability to detect when a headset is plugged in.

Source: The Verge

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By semiconshawn on 11/12/2012 8:23:26 PM , Rating: 3
Court costs? Stupid. Maybe they will take it out of the $1-3 billion dollars Samsung is paying in the US. What if its $20 million? So what that's like me losing a lawsuit and ordered to pay 5 cents. These mega corps are immune to normal monetary punishment.

RE: Stupid
By retrospooty on 11/12/2012 8:30:38 PM , Rating: 2
I wouldn't worry about it Samsung isnt going to have to pay a red cent in the United States. Let the appeal with a higher level judge and without a hometown jury take place.

RE: Stupid
By semiconshawn on 11/12/2012 11:31:44 PM , Rating: 2
Oh good another fortune teller. Thanks.

RE: Stupid
By retrospooty on 11/13/2012 7:20:49 AM , Rating: 2
Fortune telling has nothing to do with it. The low level trial in Apples backyard was full of holes. The higher level courts are higher level for a reason. It's the more qualified judges using a more qualified process with ALL of the evidence to be shown.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki