Wisconsin Judge Kicks Apple v. Google Out of Federal Court for a Third Time
November 6, 2012 5:38 PM
comment(s) - last by
Judge Crabb questioned Apple's willingness to license
They say the third time's the charm, but that certainly did
hold true regarding Apple, Inc.'s (
dreams of banning
Google Inc.'s (
) Motorola Mobility unit's products and forcing the rival firm into compulsory licensing at rates of fractions of pennies on the dollar. A federal court kicked out the suit/countersuit between the warring duo a third time, raising questions of whether both companies are wasting taxpayer time and court resources with their smartphone patent war.
I. Google v. Apple is Kicked Out in Eleventh Hour
Just hours before a trial
would have begun
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
under the jurisdiction of Judge Barbara Crabb threw out the case, arguing that Apple essentially was wasting the court's time.
One focus of the trial was supposed to be establishing a "fair" licensing rate for video codec and wireless communication patents, which were developed by Motorola as part of industry standards under so-called "
fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory
" (FRAND) licensing promises.
Judge Crabb initially expressed willingness to suggest such a rate. But when Apple's lawyers wrote in a filing last week that they would reject her guidance if the rate ended up being higher than $1 USD per iPhone, she grew irate at the Cupertino company's apparent arrogance.
Apple told the federal judge that it would only accept her guidance if it liked it.
[Image Source: ZuperDZigh]
With its filing, Apple essentially was telling the federal judge that it wanted to take up her time evaluating the licensing rates, but it would only accept her guidance if it liked what she ruled. Judge Crabb responded by telling Apple's lawyers that it was not a valid use of court resources to merely act in a non-binding advisory capacity to private corporations' licensing discussions. If Apple wanted to bring matters to court, it would be the court that had the final say in the ruling, not the other way around.
II. A Win for Google
In the dismissal she is quoted by
, "It has become clear that Apple's interest in a license is qualified."
Judge Barbara Crabb grew frustrated with Apple, evenutally tossing out its case.
Google's lawyers praised the decision. In a statement, they commented, "We remain interested in reaching an agreement with Apple."
It's possible that Apple's lawyers could make a bid to apologize and urge the Wisconsin federal judge to reconsider working on the case. But it seems unlikely that will happen, unless they back off from their apparent belief that they are in the driver's seat when it comes to the ruling.
More likely the case will die out, much like the lawsuit before it, which was
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Judge Richard A. Posner
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
judge who was moonlighting in the lower district court for the important case. As Judge Posner was a senior justice on the Appeals Circuit that Apple would have had to appeal the case to, that effort was dead in the water.
In that case as well, Judge Posner initially
to hear Apple's arguments, but was taken aback by a constant stream of belligerent filings from Apple's legal team, which
he found complained
even after he handed them relative victories. Judge Posner subsequently dismissed the case "with prejudice".
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: "with prejudice" is the important part
11/7/2012 8:03:53 AM
No he didn't...
"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh
Judge Grants Heavy Redactions for Microsoft vs. Google Federal Trial
November 2, 2012, 12:50 PM
Judge Posner Dismisses Apple-Motorola Case Again, Blasts Apple
June 25, 2012, 1:44 PM
Apple's Case Against Motorola/Google Dismissed "With Prejudice"
June 8, 2012, 11:00 AM
Apple Inserts Foot in Mouth, is Blasted for Complaining About U.S. Victory
April 4, 2012, 3:30 PM
Judge's Ruling Upholds Apple Patent, Could Jeopardize Android's Future in the U.S.
April 2, 2012, 9:32 PM
AT&T Will Also Receive the HTC One (M8) for Windows
August 19, 2014, 9:27 PM
Sharp's "Edge-to-Edge" AQUOS Crystal Smartphone Coming to Sprint for $239 Off-Contract
August 19, 2014, 7:31 PM
After 34 Years With Microsoft, Steve Ballmer Parts Way to Focus on LA Clippers
August 19, 2014, 4:17 PM
HTC One (M8) for Windows Officially Announced for Verizon Wireless
August 19, 2014, 12:15 PM
Quick Note: ASUS Readies Smartwatch for IFA 2014, Shows Teaser Image
August 19, 2014, 9:30 AM
LG Already Gearing Up for G Watch Sequel Next Month
August 19, 2014, 7:54 AM
Most Popular Articles
Lumia 830 Gets Major Upgrades Including New 20.1 Megapixel Toshiba Sensor
August 15, 2014, 6:00 PM
With USB Type-C Spec Finalized, Reversible Cables Will Soon Be Upon Us
August 13, 2014, 8:46 AM
Windows Phone, BlackBerry Smartphone Market Share Falls to 2.5%, 0.5% Respectively
August 15, 2014, 9:44 AM
Update: Samsung Gets Official With 4.7”, Aluminum-frame Galaxy Alpha Smartphone
August 14, 2014, 8:56 AM
GM Concedes That the Cadillac ELR Doesn’t Really Compete with the Tesla Model S
August 15, 2014, 5:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information