AMD's New Piledriver Opterons Claim to Match Intel's Performance at Half the Price
November 5, 2012 4:32 PM
comment(s) - last by
Servers are where thread-friendly new architecture shines the brightest
Today, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (
the Opteron 6300 Series, code-named
. Equipped with a
core, the new chips serve as an enhanced replacement to the
-equipped Opteron 6200 Series
(which was code-named
As we mentioned in our piece on the
, the new core is impressive, featuring a number of performance enhancements. However, consumer workloads tend to be lightly threaded, so the consumer workloads tend to fall short on the price-v-performance scale.
In the server market it's a very different tail. Workloads here tend to be heavily threaded in many cases, such as virtualized infrastructures, web hosting, mobile device data serving, etc.
AMD's numbers may be a bit biased, but it's claiming to essentially match rival Intel Corp.'s (
) performance in HPC (high-performance computing) applications, such as chemical simulations, with a chip that's only half the cost.
Intel will likely respond with some aggressive price cuts to stay competitive, but for now it's faced with the puzzle of how to compete with a foe that offers twice as many cores at half the cost.
Pricing (click to enlarge)
Unlike the consumer market, Intel and AMD are largely competing on the same node -- 32 nm -- for server chips. This is because Intel has yet to announce E5 series chips
, having only announced E3 series dual- and quad-core offerings.
We spoke with Michael Detwiler, AMD’s Server Product Marketing Manager, who says that AMD's focus it to be "real targeted, instead of trying to be everything to everybody."
He argues that AMD's new Opterons provide "more computations per dollar" than Intel's mixed 32 nm and 22 nm Xeon line.
Piledriver bakes in a number of enhancements (click to enlarge)
The chips feature a number of subtle improvements, including better branch prediction, new instruction set support, and a more efficient cache. In other words, everything is looking good, although third-party benchmarks weren't available at launch.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Not that hard
11/5/2012 8:14:49 PM
I bet the real numbers are significantly worse. AMD has a long history of over hyping performance claims, then back stepping upon release.
"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs
AMD's Bumps FX Series With New Piledriver Cores, Close Gap With Intel
October 23, 2012, 6:34 AM
Fourteen New Intel Ivy Bridge Chips Announced
May 31, 2012, 11:52 AM
AMD Launches 16 Core Interlagos Opteron Servers, Targets HPC, Cloud Computing
November 14, 2011, 10:00 AM
Google's Gleaming Glass HQ Gets Mountain View Snub, LinkedIn Gets the Love
May 7, 2015, 6:58 AM
Tech's Tax Day Fortunate Few: Qualcomm, Xerox, GE, et al. Pay Little or No Taxes
April 15, 2015, 11:30 AM
LinkNYC Terminals to Blanket New York City With Free WiFi, Free Calls, and Ads
November 17, 2014, 6:50 PM
Microsoft is Open-Sourcing Most of .NET, Adding OS X and Linux Support
November 12, 2014, 8:27 PM
Home Depot Lost 53 Million Emails, Blames Windows, Buys Execs New Macs
November 9, 2014, 5:00 PM
Former NSA Lawyer: If Google, Apple Encrypt User Data, They’ll Wither on the Vine Like Blackberry
November 6, 2014, 12:15 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information