backtop


Print 90 comment(s) - last by TakinYourPoint.. on Nov 5 at 11:25 AM

UK judges to Apple: "Not good enough!"

Last week, Apple posted a notice on its UK website which indicated that Samsung didn't copy the iPad when it designed the Galaxy Tab family of tablets. Of course, Apple didn't do this out of the kindness of its heart -- it was ordered to do so by a UK court.
 
In keeping with Apple’s typical demeanor towards its competitors, the notice posted on its website was rather flippant and pointed to how the Samsung tablets weren’t deemed to be as “cool” as the iPad. Apple also pointed out in its notice that it had won judgments against Samsung in both German and U.S. courts.
 
It appears, however, that UK judges weren't amused by Apple's play on words, and called the Cupertino, California-based company's statements "incorrect" and "untrue".
 
According to Bloomberg News, the U.K. Court of Appeal in London has ordered Apple to remove the notice from its website within 24 hours to correct the inaccuracies. It also has to post a new, revised version within 48 hours.
 
“I’m at a loss that a company such as Apple would do this,” said a puzzled Judge Robin Jacob. “That is a plain breach of the order.”
 
One of Samsung's lawyers, Henry Carr, piled on by starting that Apple's original notice left the “impression that the U.K. court is out of step with other courts” by mentioning the judgments in Apple's favor by German and U.S. courts.

Source: Bloomberg



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Hmm...
By messele on 11/1/2012 1:18:39 PM , Rating: -1
There is absolutely nothing on there that is not factually correct. Every word on there is 100% true, quoted from source and reflects the actual situation.

All that's happened is they have dented the Judge's pride - a big nono given how far up themselves they are. This is why sentences that involve perverting the cause of justice or perjury often get far harsher penalties than murder.

The dumbass Judge who ruled that not being as 'cool' is a valid defence is an idiot and was begging to be quoted in this way.




RE: Hmm...
By chris2618 on 11/1/2012 1:42:31 PM , Rating: 2
It all fine till the "however" paragraph which essentially states by proxy that Samsung infringed apples design which the whole thing was about. In addition it blatantly only mentions cases were the judges sided with apple.


RE: Hmm...
By messele on 11/1/12, Rating: -1
RE: Hmm...
By augiem on 11/1/2012 3:22:39 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Since when, in any legal case, did the defendants present any facts that go against their case? Like I say, there's absolutely nothing in there that is not true. The fact that there is no balance is no surprise, that's how legal cases work.


This is NOT a legal case being presented in a courtroom. That is over and Apple lost. This is the punishment as ordered by the court. Apple does not have the right to spin it in their favor or leave out details to save face.


RE: Hmm...
By messele on 11/1/2012 3:45:03 PM , Rating: 1
It's still a legal case and the principles persist. They (like anybody) are going to do the absolute bare minimum to comply and, in the absence of being told otherwise, will put in anything they please to get their own point across.

This IS the punishment ordered by the court, that is my point too. The orders were ambiguous and frankly the Judge was incredibly sloppy in the presenting of his orders.


RE: Hmm...
By Helbore on 11/1/2012 6:00:35 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
They (like anybody) are going to do the absolute bare minimum to comply


Actually, that's not true. Some people regret their crimes and will go out of their way to comply with the spirit of the law. The courts tend to look favourably on such people.

Similarly, the courts take a dim view of those who try their damnedest to skirt around their punishments.

There's a simple rule in law - do not piss off the judge.


RE: Hmm...
By chris2618 on 11/1/2012 3:47:10 PM , Rating: 1
Its has no bearing on the statement if its is true or not there are stating in the bottom paragraph that Samsung copied the design. The court found otherwise. The time for debate in the legal system is over.

"detail requests as they go along to cover their ineptitude"

The reason for the change is apples inability at following a simple instruction. The judge has changed nothing, apple is the one that has not complied with an order from the court.


RE: Hmm...
By messele on 11/1/12, Rating: 0
RE: Hmm...
By simsony on 11/1/2012 8:07:43 PM , Rating: 2
Apple was clearly told that they are to make clear to the public that Samsung did not infringe on their design. This is partly because Apple chose to court the media, and publicize the case.

Normally judgements are not punitive, the benefit of the doubt is given especially to large corporations, who have experienced lawyers and normally respect and comply with judgements. It is different during the case, when all tricks are played. Microsoft for example complied with all judgements as expected.

In this case, everybody knew what was expected of Apple. So no one saw the need to double check. The very fact that Apple is referring to the German court, on the UK website, as part of the UK courts order, is something every lawyer knows is contempt of court. So let's not pretend that Apple has just threaded the fine line of the law, they have well and truly crossed it, and broken the law.

If a rapist was asked to apologise, but said it is allowed in some other country, would you find that acceptable?

This is not the first time Apple thinks it is above the law, and it won't be the last.

My worry is what next? What exactly as a corporation does Apple think they get to do? Will they bankroll politicians to legislate Apple products every where? Does the desire of a profit justify anything?

Their profitability and brand imagery is creating a kind of halo, which people like to be associated with, to find their own personal worth and identity.

Tony is a good example of that, an attack on Apple is an attack on him. Apple seems to define him, his identity - the time he spends on it is quite surprising.

Profitability does not automatically translate to greatness, they need to show far more qualities, an iota of morality would be a good start. Like respecting the law of the land.


"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki