Amid Recent Cyberattacks, Senate Poised to Revive Cybersecurity Bill
November 1, 2012 2:37 PM
comment(s) - last by
It's backk!! Controversial proposal regarding public/private sharing via the DHS gets
In recent years the U.S. has struggled under the weight of
from China. But in recent months, a
new threat has emerged
-- Iran -- a nation the U.S. long wrote off a cyber-weakling.
I. Reviving S.3414
In the midst of this two-sided battle, the Obama administration is making a second pitch to members of Congress to revive and pass a slightly modified version of the
Cybersecurity Act of 2012
The administration's argument is basically, "
Hey, we'll take out the parts of the cybersecurity bill that you don't necessarily want to be seen supporting, and replace them with executive orders
Most on both sides of the aisle agree that in the perfect world there would be some sort of exchange of threat information between the government and the private sector; the question is how to do that, without imposing onerous red tape on the private sector.
There is some base controversy about the fact that the administration's plan flows data through the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Rep. Ron Paul
(R-TX) has attacked the bill, which he calls a "big brother writ at large", and also called out the DHS as an "inefficient and redundant entity, commenting, "It’s the inefficiency of the bureaucracy that is the problem. So, increasing this with the Department of Homeland Security and spending more money doesn't absolve us of the problem."
Businesses are mistrustful of the government's ability to secure their risk analyses.
[Image Source: Stream 20]
But many Republicans are supportive of having the DHS handle terrorist threats -- including in cyberspace; after all it was a Republican who created the DHS in the post-9/11 aftermath.
The part that bothers the majority of Republicans is opposition from major businesses which fear Sec. 102 "Sector-by-sector cyber risk assessments". The concern from the private sector lies not so much in the cost -- businesses will generally be forced to perform such risk analyses anyhow. Rather, there's fear that the government could lose this data as it has lost masses of data in the past (Wikileaks, anyone?) exposing potentially embarrassing and damaging vulnerabilities.
So the Obama administration may snip the Sec. 102 language, while keeping the basic concept of the government sharing information on threats with private sector firms like banks and defense contractors.
Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid
(D-NV) is reportedly preparing to introduce the slightly revised bill,
Comments Jeffrey Ratner, senior adviser for cybersecurity on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, on the removal of the Sec. 102 language, "[Bill coauthor Joe Lieberman] wants legislation [on risk analysis], but he's willing to focus on the rest of this bill, because there are important things there that he believes need to be implemented."
II. Watered Down or Bipartisan Compromise?
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-NH) is one of the bill's coauthors, who is working with Sen. Reid, a former party colleague on the draft.
DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano says the bill will not create new bureaucracy, merely improve and codify efforts that are already underway. She comments, "We know there are … vulnerabilities. We are working with [private industry] on that."
The revised bill is likely to move closer to a bipartisan bill proposed by House of Representatives by
Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee
Rep. Mike Rogers
(R-MI) and the top Democrat on that panel,
Rep. C.A. Ruppersberger
(D-MD). That bill is known as the The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (
The plan is to pass the pared down bill, which some critics call a "watered down" version of
. President Obama will then
try to implement
some of the removed features
via executive orders
, placing the blame or credit for them on his own administration, not Congress.
President Obama's cabinet is looking to implement the missing features of S.3414 with executive orders. [Image Source: Associated Press]
But even if that plan may be palatable to Congress, not everyone thinks it will help safeguard the U.S. Dmitri Alperovitch, chief technology officer of CrowdStrike, argued to
that the real problem is that U.S. lacks the backbone to initiate digital counterstrikes or offline trade repercussions against those who attack it.
"We're having the wrong debate," he says, "What's the benefit of information-sharing if you're not going to act on the information?"
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
11/2/2012 9:18:57 AM
Tariffs are a horrible Idea... Just make it easier for USA born companies to compete abroad.
11/2/2012 2:21:40 PM
You bet. Tariffs are nothing but a tax on your own citizens for not being able to compete globally.
The government needs to align laws and taxes to allow better global competition. If other countries have tariffs and there's a gross imbalance, then apply inbound trade sanctions or some other political solution. This also helps our foreign policy create a better balance of trade so it's not so one-sided to start.
11/2/2012 6:38:26 PM
I understand that completely. But US taxes and laws are being "ammended" by the same corporations that want more profit. Those being the ones that import the most things cheaply made overseas. The name of the game is money, get as much of it as you possibly can. By any means necessary. Pay for lobbyists. Check. Pay for campaign ads. Check. Ask to get one line added into tax code. Checkmate.
"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer
Move Over China, Iran May Have Been Source of Latest Cyberattacks on the U.S.
October 16, 2012, 4:25 AM
Executive Order on Cyber Security in the Works from DHS, FBI, White House
September 20, 2012, 8:47 AM
Following Defeat, Obama to Reportedly Push Cybersecurity Bill With Executive Orders
August 7, 2012, 7:26 PM
President Obama Scolds Businesses, Urges Passage of Cybersecurity Act
July 20, 2012, 5:16 PM
China Continues to Gleefully Hack U.S. as Gov't Efforts Sunk by Partisanship
March 2, 2012, 1:47 PM
Google Knocked by Analysts, But Shows Strokes of Brilliance in Q1 2014
April 18, 2014, 2:33 PM
Google Street View and reCAPTCHA Get Smarter with New Algorithm
April 17, 2014, 9:02 AM
Mt. Gox CEO Refuses to Come to the U.S. in Financial Crimes Probe
April 16, 2014, 3:50 PM
Mark Zuckerberg: Facebook Home Reception Slower than Expected, Social Graph Will Pick Up
April 16, 2014, 2:00 PM
FBI's Facial Recognition Database to Have 52 Million Criminal, Non-Criminal Photos by 2015
April 15, 2014, 2:56 PM
Microsoft's Anti-Google "Scroogled" Campaign May Have Ended
April 15, 2014, 2:44 PM
Most Popular Articles
Cities to Carpoolers: Sharing Your Car is Illegal, We Will Seize Your Cars
April 4, 2014, 9:17 PM
iPad Exploiter is Freed by Federal Appeals Court
April 11, 2014, 7:40 PM
A-10 Warthog May Live to Fight Another Day with Support from Lawmakers
April 14, 2014, 9:41 AM
Taiwan's AOU Claims to Have World's Highest-Res. OLED Smartphone Display
April 11, 2014, 1:44 PM
EFF: NSA May Have Used IRC Botnets to Exploit Heartbleed for Last Two Years
April 14, 2014, 4:43 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information