Print 20 comment(s) - last by Moishe.. on Nov 2 at 2:07 PM

AMD anyone?

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) announced on Monday that it would be releasing new 64-bit Opterons in 2014 leveraging a radically different architecture to its current complex instruction set computer (CISC) x86 architecture -- ARM Holdings plc's (LON:ARM) reduced instruction set computer (RISC) ARM architecture.

At the tiime AMD mentioned in passing that the chips were 64-bit.  That led to a bit of mystery, as ARM had not officially announced a 64-bit intellectual property core yet, although one was widely rumored.

That mystery was laid to rest yesterday when ARM Holdings announced a new intellectual property core -- the Cortex-A50 -- a core which leverage ARM's previously announced ARMv8 64-bit instruction set extensions.

The chips will tackle the full range of applications -- everything from smartphones to servers.  It is the linear successor to the 32-bit ARM Cortex-A15.

ARM Holdings has announced several Cortex-A50 cores geared at different objectives. The ARM Cortex-A53 will be the most power-efficent ARM processor, and the world's "smallest" (according to ARM) 64-bit processor.  ARM pledges that the mobile-geared Cortex-A53 will offer "three times the performance" of current generation smartphone chips.

A second core, the ARM Cortex-A57, is a more powerful 64-bit core, aimed at "high-performance applications", such as heavily threaded server workloads.

Calxeda dense server
Server chip makers Calxeda (pictured) are among Cortex-A50's early adopters.

Wonder who is cooking up 64-bit ARM cores?  ARM disclosed that its initial licensee list indeed includes AMD.  Also on the list are Broadcom Corp. (BRCM)  Calxeda (Hewlett-Packard Comp.'s (HPQ) server chip partner, actually an ARM Holdings startup subsidiary), HiSilicon Technologies Comp., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KSC:005930), and STMicroelectronics N.V. (EPA:STM).

ARM says the new cores should ship in 2014.  The ARMv8 instruction set, though, is currently available for advanced developers and device implementers to start tinkering with.  Usually there's about a half year of lag time between the IP core announcement and the time when official speed and core count targets begin to trickle out from licensees: so chip buffs, stay tuned.

Source: ARM

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: .
By Shadowself on 10/31/2012 9:55:58 PM , Rating: 1
Yes, the x86 market will eventually go to just compute intensive work. Eventually even things like Photoshop or video transcoding will go to tablets. Desktops and laptops will vanish except for a niche of professionals who absolutely require them to do compute intensive work.

Yes, a large fraction of users don't do anything compute intensive today. Quicken (or MYOB or whatever) or social media don't take much. But a lot of people like to convert their photos (point and shoot or prosumer) to formats that are more distributable. Today's tablets are barely able to do that without a significant lag. Upload RAW format images (and yes, a lot of people go on the 'net and read that they should ONLY shoot in RAW and do so without understanding what it really means) from their Nikon or Cannon prosumer device to a tablet then convert it to a more manageable image and it's not so trivial. For the next few years it's going to be much, much easier on a desktop or laptop. And with the ever increasing pixel count of prosumer cameras, as well as bit depth of each pixel, the tablets are chasing a moving target.

Eventually tablets, and to a lesser extent smart phones will win out. However, tablets and phones replacing desktops and laptops won't happen for at least 10 years or more. It could even be 15 years or more.

The processing power of a current high end Xeon chip or current top end i7 is so much higher than anything ARM is currently putting out -- or even has planned in the next couple years -- that the difference is going to insurmountable for many, many years. Add to that the highest end GPUs in ganged modes (running 2 or 3 or 4 GPUs in the same desktop) and you've got machines that that ARM based hardware just fantasizes about being when they grow up.

RE: .
By someguy123 on 10/31/2012 10:41:28 PM , Rating: 2
You say "eventually" yet even the top of the line consumer CPUs struggle depending on software, even in photoshop editing. One of the reasons why adobe added OCL to their software suite.

I find it sort of confusing how people can claim ARM will dominate so soon when the chips are so slow. Ask someone if they want a dual core atom and they'll say it's much too slow, but dual core krait would have people drooling even though they're similar in performance. People seem to think that the benchmark for high CPU performance is web browsing on a cellphone.

"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki