Print 51 comment(s) - last by Darnell021.. on Nov 13 at 12:47 PM

Scott Forstall on stage with the late Steve Jobs
Apple is on the lookout for a new senior vice president of Retail, and will divide Forstall's responsibilities among other Apple execs

Apple revealed today that two key company executives will be leaving in the near future: Scott Forstall and John Browett. 
Forstall, the vice president of iOS software, will be leaving Apple next year after working with the company for about 15 years. He recently headed the launch of Apple's new maps application, which turned out to be a nightmare. Apple ditched Google Maps as its main iOS maps app in favor of its own in-house maps service, but when it launched, there were huge issues with the geography and navigation
Despite the maps mess, Forstall's upcoming departure still comes as a shock. When former Apple CEO Steve Jobs died, Forstall was considered the most "Jobsian" Apple employee to take his place. He was a Jobs protégé, from the enthusiastic personality to the same wardrobe to the same exact model car. However, Tim Cook got the job. 

Scott Forstall
Browett, head of Apple retail, will be leaving Apple as well. This seems a little less surprising, considering Browett led a retail hiring formula earlier this year that ended up being a huge mistake. This new formula caused Apple to lay off several new retail hires (some that only recently finished their training) and significantly cut the hours of part-timers back in August. Needless to say, this didn't make employees very happy, and Apple was forced to admit that it messed up
Browett joined the Apple team in April 2012. He came from UK-based Dixons Retail electronics stores, where many would argue that he didn't do a very good job there either. 
Apple said it's on the lookout for a new senior vice president of Apple Retail. As for Forstall, the tech giant has decided to divide his responsibilities among other Apple execs instead of bringing in any newcomers. 

John Browett [Image Source: The Telegraph]
Jony Ive, Apple's head of Industrial Design, will take over Human Interface (HI) for the company while Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of Internet Software and Services, will take on Siri, Maps, the iTunes Store, the App Store, iCloud and the iBookstore. Furthermore, Bob Mansfield (who was supposed to be retiring), Apple's senior vice president of Mac and Devices Hardware Engineering, will lead a new group called "Technologies" for all of Apple's wireless teams while Craig Federighi, Apple's senior vice president of Mac Software Engineering, will take over iOS and OS X. 
Of course, Apple had to insert how well it's doing to offset the mistakes its higher-ups made this year:
"We are in one of the most prolific periods of innovation and new products in Apple's history," said Tim Cook, Apple CEO. "The amazing products that we've introduced in September and October, iPhone 5iOS 6iPad mini, iPad, iMac, MacBook Pro, iPod touch, iPod nano and many of our applications, could only have been created at Apple and are the direct result of our relentless focus on tightly integrating world-class hardware, software and services." 

Source: Apple

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Trisped on 10/30/2012 11:42:20 AM , Rating: 3
When former Apple CEO Steve Jobs died, Forstall was considered the most "Jobsian" Apple employee to take his place. He was a Jobs protégé, from the enthusiastic personality to the same wardrobe to the same exact model car. However, Tim Cook got the job.
Anyone who would release the crappy map service he did is not sufficiently "Jobsian" to run a company. Jobs was very strict on maintaining the image of quality. Releasing the maps in the state that he did proves either he is a hack/wannabe, or he has checked out. I am going with wannabe.

RE: Wannabe
By zephyrprime on 10/30/2012 12:19:43 PM , Rating: 2
I don't really blame whoever was in charge of the maps app for screwing it up. It's clear that Apple rushed maps to market knowing that it was riddled with bad data. They did it because they had a business reason to spite Google, their #1 competitor in the phone market. Apple acted imprudently but that was the ceo's decision, not Forstall's (probably).

RE: Wannabe
By nangryo on 10/30/2012 12:31:16 PM , Rating: 2
Did you know that it is only with Tim Cook permission that iphone could be released, even on that stated with imperfect apple maps.

So just blaming one person sound fish to me. There is something big intern there that we doesn't know or may never know

RE: Wannabe
By retrospooty on 10/30/2012 12:54:51 PM , Rating: 2
meh... Companies always have a "public" answer that they put out when people of this level leave. It's all PR and means nothing.

Chalk it up to 1 of 2 things... Either Apple just wasn't happy with hime and wanted to make a change or he decided to leave on his own for another opportunity (or whatever personal reason). Neither of which is really a negative thing. People come and go.

RE: Wannabe
By Tony Swash on 10/30/12, Rating: 0
RE: Wannabe
By simsony on 10/30/2012 4:37:27 PM , Rating: 2
The issue of the timing of the switch away from Google maps was also time constrained, it had to fit into a major iOS version upgrade because it was such a system wide function and given the timing of the end of the original Google mapping agreement that meant it had to be part of the iOS 6 release.

This does not make sense. Apple is in complete control of its versioning and could have very happily released Apple maps in 6.5 when it was mature or in iOS7. Previous iOS revisions have had changes to the API. Moreover the APIs are backwards compatible, even with iOS6.

If necessary, they could have purchased TomTom or Garmin to get a clear head start. Focussing on the quality not the marketing aspect.

They were not time constrained in anyway. Google strategy also proved otherwise with a possible Google maps app coming.

With previous changes (System 9 to MacOSX, PowerPC to Intel) , transitional arrangements were made (eg Rosetta - they acquired a company for this), and moreover existing product support was continued. No One felt any loss of functionality, they only had trouble moving on with new functionality.

The Apple maps situation is different. The transition to Apple Maps is an immediate step backwards in functionality for the end user. A downgrade is not permitted, and customer support is not valid for older versions, you are expected to upgrade. There is no supported option to keep the functionality enjoyed before.

And please don't tell me Google Maps webapp, it is not the same and everyone who has used the old maps and the web app fricking knows it. It is a fanboy excuse, and as soon as I see it I know I am dealing with a disciple of the Church of Apple.

RE: Wannabe
By dark matter on 10/30/2012 5:08:39 PM , Rating: 2
It's Tony Swash.

Nothing he says makes sense. It's just noise.

RE: Wannabe
By Darnell021 on 11/13/2012 12:47:17 PM , Rating: 2
WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL APPLE THEY COULD'VE PURCHASED TOMTOM OR GARMIN YEARS AGO!?!? What a gigantic oversight, right!? If some random guy on a tech forum knew TomTom and Garmin were trying to sell their companies then why didn't Apple know!? You have raised some really good points!

Hopefully someone from Apple is reading this right now, I heard there is a job opening up in that very department soon! You sound like you have some wicked good insight into how Apple should run it's business!

Seriously though, no one is saying Apple MAPS isn't a giant flop, even Forstall got the boot. Apple has acquired at least 3 Mapping companies already since 2009, but there goal wasn't to re-badge an app; that wouldn't have been a profitable thing to do(Siri, obviously being the glaring exception to that rule). Google has had almost 10 years of grooming on it's MAPS application, Apple has had maybe a year and half if you count the development process and not just it's release date this past summer. Wait for MAPS 2.0 before you really start giving Apple sh*t for this. With something that needs to be accurate for each individual person in the United States, expect there to be alot of discrepancies in the data.

Tony Swash got it right when he said Forstall should've buttered this app in it's public release and not sit there telling the world it's the new perfection. How smooth a transition was Final Cut Pro X? At least with MAPS you can download alot of alternatives.

Trying to release new services on a worldwide scale into markets that already have mature products are always going to have lots of issues. Apple is learning the hard way they aren't special.

RE: Wannabe
By Trisped on 10/30/2012 5:39:44 PM , Rating: 2
Apple had to dump Google maps. Google wouldn't add a turn-by-turn feature
This is of course, incorrect. Google multiple times stated (publicly) that they would add turn-by-turn and other features to their maps, but Apple would not provide them access to the necessary hardware to do so (probably full read access to the GPS).

It should also be noted that the Google Maps released with the original iPhone has seen very little change over the years. The fact is that Apple wanted to make Google look like the bad guy so when they replaced Google Maps with their version everyone would say "Yes, this is definitely better then my old map app."

Apple could have kept Google Maps as long as it wanted. It also could have taken a fully baked, existing system (from TomTom, Garmin, or anyone else with a working solution) and replaced it. It did not have to pull Google Maps and stick in its own, inferior, product.

Apple (under Jobs) never truly apologized. While they did release press statements which indicated a problem had been found and fixed, or provide alternate ways of using a product to avoid its flaws (your holding it wrong and the free cases) they never truly (to my knowledge) release a statement to the effect of "We screwed up, we are sorry". There was a case when a feature (do not remember which) was so screwed up that jobs called in the department which was working on it, asked them (probably yelled) what it was suppose to do, then why it did not do that. All the leadership for that project was fired. It did not matter if they would have said sorry, Jobs would not have let them.

RE: Wannabe
By Trisped on 10/30/2012 5:44:38 PM , Rating: 2
Apple is a very structured and strict company. It is how they prevent information leaks, keep device security high, and maintain their quality control.

That being said, it is not Tim Cook's job to check every single thing on every single product he releases. He has a company to run.

The last time an issue like this occured Jobs called in the leadership responsable, asked them what it was suppose to do, then asked why it did not do that (the exact quotes made it clear he was really mad). They were fired shortly there after.

In short, Forstall's termination was imminent.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki