backtop


Print 67 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Oct 30 at 9:14 AM


Samsung Galaxy S III  (Source: mobilemag.com)
Samsung did well, but many worry that it won't see this amount of money rolling in next year as the smartphone market continues to grow competitive

Samsung reported strong financial earnings in the third quarter, but now faces slowed smartphone momentum in the future as the market gets more crowded.

Samsung posted $7.4 billion USD in Q3 2012 operating profit. Net profit rose 90 percent to $5.9 billion USD. 

During the third quarter, Samsung sold 56.3 million smartphones, giving it a global market share of 31.3 percent. Apple only sold 26.9 million iPhones in the same quarter. The Samsung Galaxy S III alone accounted for 18-20 million shipments from July to September.

While Samsung did well in the smartphone department, particularly with its Galaxy line of devices, it didn't do so hot in chip sales. The chip division dropped 28 percent to $1 billion USD.

Samsung rocked a healthy profit overall this quarter, but many worry that the electronics maker won't see this amount of money rolling in next year as the smartphone market continues to grow competitive.

In fact, Samsung's profit is expected to grow 16 percent next year -- down from this year's predictions of 73 percent.

Samsung has other strong businesses, like tablets and OLED TVs, but analysts say these sectors aren't quite ready to sell the way that Galaxy is selling.

Samsung's tablets, in particular, haven't been able to keep up with the like of the iPad and Kindle Fire. Now, with the iPad Mini and Windows 8 tablets making a fresh appearance into the market (not to mention Google's Nexus 7 and a refreshed Kindle Fire HD line has made its way into the market), Samsung seems to continuously fall behind.

Samsung also took a hard hit with tablets due to its patent war with Apple. Apple worked pretty hard to ban Samsung's smartphones and tablets around the world, and successfully accomplished this in countries like Germany and Australia. Samsung launched a few lawsuits of its own regarding 3G patents, and was also able to lift the ban on its Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia in December 2011. However, Samsung wasn't so lucky in Germany, where the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is still banned.

Back in August, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California reached an unfavorable verdict for Samsung, saying that the South Korean electronics maker was guilty of violating technology patents. In other words, most of Samsung's smartphones and tablets in question were found guilt of copying Apple's iPhone and iPad designs. It was ordered to pay $1.05 billion in damages to Apple.

Earlier this week, Samsung Display decided to cut ties with Apple, saying it will no longer ship LCDs to Apple next year. Its LCD shipments to Apple have been cut more and more over time due to Apple wanting huge discounts, but the recent patent infringement drama couldn't have helped either.

More recently, an ITC judge found that Samsung violated four Apple patents, including
the flat front face with wider borders at the top and bottom, the lozenge-shaped speaker about the display screen; the translucent images for applications displayed on the screen, and the device's ability to detect when a headset is plugged in.

Samsung did get a little bit of relief in the UK, though, when a judge ordered Apple to post a notice on its UK site that Samsung didn't copy the iPad. Apple complied, but in a very snarky way.



Source: Samsung



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Impressive
By ritualm on 10/28/2012 12:52:35 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
the usual pro-Apple BS

Summary: Apple is justified in giving LESS features, LESS benefits, LESS innovation... while charging crazy high prices, far beyond reasonable manufacturing costs... to support its quarterly billions.

You care more about Apple's quarterly profits and Apple products than you care about anything non-Apple. And here you are claiming "I don't defend ANY company".

You are a paid Apple shill, nothing more, nothing less. You are like Beenthere, Nortel and Tony Swash, a blithering, talking lump of human excrement... and to top it all off, you are worse than Jason Mick.

Do not pass GO, do not collect $200.


RE: Impressive
By retrospooty on 10/28/2012 1:15:12 PM , Rating: 2
Lol... I know. The transparency of this guy is amazing.


RE: Impressive
By Cheesew1z69 on 10/29/2012 8:19:03 AM , Rating: 2
Remember, unless Tester says it's fact, relevant or logical, it's none of those. You are all wrong.


RE: Impressive
By testerguy on 10/28/2012 6:26:22 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Summary: Apple is justified in giving LESS features, LESS benefits, LESS innovation... while charging crazy high prices, far beyond reasonable manufacturing costs... to support its quarterly billions.


Way to not get it, at all.

Summary: 5 things on Android not on iPhone. 27 things that the iPhone does better.

I don't care about profits at all. Don't be ridiculous. I also never said 'I don't defend ANY company' - that's your own failed mis-quote. Go and try to find where I said it, you retard.

Calling me a shill does nothing to address the factual points I made.


RE: Impressive
By goatfajitas on 10/28/2012 11:09:28 PM , Rating: 2
you should really get into politics, because you can spin with the best of them. better yet, just get a hobby and find something better to do with your time than troll.


RE: Impressive
By BabelHuber on 10/29/2012 6:57:39 AM , Rating: 2
When I read such comments I always am glad that I personally also know iPhone-users who are not retards. :-)

You cannot just say 'phone X has 5 advantages and phone Y has 10 advantages, hence phone Y is better'. This is simply stupid.

It of course depends on the personal needs of a user and how important a feature is for him. And him alone, not you or me.

For me e.g. rSAP is a must-have-feature period. iOS does not support it. Neither doeas Android, but with Android I am able to root my phone, download an according App and voilá, here is rSAP.

Let's say you are right and the iPhone has a better display. So what? This does not help me when I want to use the phone in my car.

Also, I expect of my phone that it has a file browser, can act as USB stick (without needing any software on the PC!), supports bluetooth file transfer, SD-cards and has a well thought-out concept for a root user.

The iPhone would have to be able to teleport me or so to make up for these shortcomings.

Other people e.g. don't even own a car or don't need to have lots of phone calls while driving, so rSAP is not absolutely necessary for them. But it is for me.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki