Print 22 comment(s) - last by JediJeb.. on Oct 28 at 5:32 PM

New process could help combat rare Earth resource shortage

Money and global conflict have long been the core drivers of innovation.

I. What is Old, is New Again

So with rare earth metal prices at an all time high, and U.S. buyers irked by the fact that rare earth metals are controlled by China, the pressure to find alternatives or to reuse existing stocks is extreme.

That backdrop has driven the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Ames Laboratory  -- a research institution tied to the Iowa State University -- to refine a process it developed in the 1990s, repurposing it for molten rare earth metal recycling.

The process looks to extract neodymium, which is one of the most commonly used rare earth metals.  Only 20,000 tons of neodymium is produced per year, while demand is around 22,350 tons [source].  The scarce resource is primarily used in powerful magnets that are used to regenerate power in hybrid electric vehicles or to generate power in wind turbines.

Neodymium wide
Slowly China came to dominate rare earth metal production, a realm once dominated by the U.S. (neodymium magnets pictured) [Image Source: Doug Kanter/Bloomberg]

Prices on neodymium have relaxed slightly, but still sit at around $150 USD/kg [source].  And a greater looming problem is that prospecting only estimates global reserves of the resource to be at around 8 million tons [source].

The original Ames Lab project in the 1990s merely looked to extract neodymium from neodymium-iron-boron magnet scrap, using liquid magnesium.  The idea was that the neodymium would strengthen the resulting alloy.  At the time rare earth prices were low, so this was the most attractive use of the scrap method.

Rare earth metals
Neodymium from Chinese-owned Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Rare-Earth Hi-Tech Co. factory in Baotou, Inner Mongol  [Image Source: Nelson Ching/Bloomberg]

But with rare earth prices soaring, Ames Lab researchers began to think about repurposing the method to extract the neodymium.  The crucial question was whether the resulting yields would retain the same attractive magnetic properties as the original magnets.

II. Molten Extraction

Lead researcher Ryan Ott worked with colleague Larry Jones, also of Ames Lab.  Professor Ott describes the process, commenting, "We start with sintered, uncoated magnets that contain three rare earths: neodymium, praseodymium and dysprosium.  Then we break up the magnets in an automated mortar and pestle until the pieces are 2-4 millimeters long."

The magnet scraps go in a mesh screen box within a steel crucible and magnesium chunks are added.  Heated by radio waves, the magnesium in the vessel is melted, while the magnet scraps remain solid.  Magnesium has a relatively low melting point of 923 K, 650 °C (Neodymium's melting point is 1297 K, 1024 °C).

The magic is that the rare earths then diffuse out of the magnet scraps.  Professor Ott describes, "The iron and boron that made up the original magnet are left behind."

Rare earth extraction
The rare earth metals are extracted via diffusion into molten magnesium.
[Image Source: Ames Lab]

The magnesium + rare earths combination is cast into an ingot and cooled.  Finally, the magnesium is boiled off, leaving behind only the neodymium, praseodymium and dysprosium in a smaller ingot of pure rare earths.

Early tests show the material properties of the extracted metals compare "favorably" with those of unprocessed materials.  The next step will be to refine the extraction process and demonstrate it on a large industrial scale.

Comments Professor Ott, "We’re continuing to identify the ideal processing conditions.  We want to help bridge the gap between the fundamental science and using this science in manufacturing.  And Ames Lab can process big enough amounts of material to show that our rare-earth recycling process works on a large scale."

The research is being funded by an agreement with the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT).  South Korea, like the U.S., is a top electronics manufacturer and uses a lot of rare earths, so the research should prove mutually beneficial.

It's possible similar molten magnesium extraction methods could be applied to other rare earth alloys to recycle them.  If the process could be perfected it could mean that the electronics, automotive, and green power industries could have a modest supply of rare earth metals for millennia to come.

Source: Ames Lab

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: There is no rare earths shortage in the US
By guacamojo on 10/26/2012 3:27:41 PM , Rating: 2
Thorium MSRs are such a panacea to so many of our simultaneous and looming problems, they almost sound too good to be true.

To quote Hyman Rickover (father of the nuclear navy):

An academic reactor or reactor plant almost always has the following basic characteristics: (1) It is simple. (2) It is small. (3) It is cheap. (4) It is light. (5) It can be built very quickly. (6) It is very flexible in purpose. (7) Very little development will be required. It will use off-the-shelf components. (8) The reactor is in the study phase. It is not being built now.

On the other hand a practical reactor can be distinguished by the following characteristics: (1) It is being built now. (2) It is behind schedule. (3) It requires an immense amount of development on apparently trivial items. (4) It is very expensive. (5) It takes a long time to build because of its engineering development problems. (6) It is large. (7) It is heavy. (8) It is complicated.

Right now, by Rickover's criteria, Thorium MSR's are "academic." What does that mean for the "practical" version?

RE: There is no rare earths shortage in the US
By boeush on 10/26/2012 3:42:43 PM , Rating: 4
Obviously, it means a lot of R&D required. Just as is the case for most other clean energy alternatives (even including wind and solar.)

Personally, I'd rather have US spend $100 Billion per year on Thorium MSR R&D, than toward the 1/7th of current Pentagon budget -- the payoff toward US national and energy security would be a whole lot greater, and the money would spend a lot more productively (rather than destructively, as it happens in military engagements.)

Also as an aside, the main reason Thorium MSRs were never commercialized, is because government financial and regulatory subsidies were deliberately tailored to favor nuclear fuel cycles and reactor designs that enabled weaponization. Since LFTRs do not produce any easily weaponizable fission byproducts, they were never sponsored by any major government, and so were allowed to wither on the vine. Personally, I view the lack of easy path to weaponization as one of the many huge advantages of LFTR technology (the other major ones being safety due to impossibility of meltdown or runaway fission, drastic reduction in both volume and life of waste, ability to recycle existing nuclear waste, tremendous abundance and relatively low cost of fuel, and side-benefits such as increased production of rare-earth metals and other valuable elements and isotopes, and easily utilizable high-heat energy source for direct chemical synthesis without lossy energy conversions to/from electricity.)

By mackx on 10/26/2012 7:11:10 PM , Rating: 2
question - aren't india and china looking into thorium reactors in a big way? and according to the link below - canada too.

just to note - judging from the name of the site - i don't expect them to be bias free :o

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki