backtop


Print 80 comment(s) - last by FITCamaro.. on Oct 26 at 9:24 AM

Regulators don't buy Microsoft's excuses about a "technical error"

It had seemed that Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and the European union had finally resolved their differences when it came to antitrust issues.  Microsoft agreed that it would offer a special "ballot screen", which would give users the choice of multiple browsers when they first installed or used Windows 7 -- and as a result, third-party browser makers would be on a level playing field and face no "bundling" discrimination.  The EU asserts its claims were validated, as the ballot screen appeared to cause a large drop in Microsoft's EU browser market share.

But that fragile true has been shattered when Microsoft went back on its promise, and stopped offering the ballot screen -- temporarily -- with the rollout of Windows 7 SP1.  Microsoft in past comments has blamed the abandonment of the option on an undisclosed "technical error" in the update.

EU regulators are unsympathetic.

This week they announced a so-called "statement of objections" -- a procedural step serves as a warning of impending punishments.

The EU's antitrust regulator, the European Commission writes:

The European Commission has informed Microsoft of its preliminary view that Microsoft has failed to comply with its commitments to offer users a choice screen enabling them to easily choose their preferred web browser. In 2009, the Commission had made these commitments legally binding on Microsoft (see IP/09/1941)....

In its statement of objections, the Commission takes the preliminary view that Microsoft has failed to roll out the browser choice screen with its Windows 7 Service Pack 1, which was released in February 2011. From February 2011 until July 2012, millions of Windows users in the EU may not have seen the choice screen. Microsoft has acknowledged that the choice screen was not displayed during that period.

Browser Ballot Box
Microsoft's Windows 7 Service Pack 1 "accidentally" turned off the browser ballot box.
[Image Source: Telegraph UK]

It's hard to say what, if anything, Microsoft can do at this point to avoid punishment for "accidentally" breaking its agreement with the EU.  One important thing to note, though, is that the precise punishment has not been announced.  Thus it is probably in Microsoft's best interest to provide sound technical evidence (if it has it) supporting its assertion that the ballot screen was turned off on accident.

The company faces tough questions, in the sense that even if it's telling the truth about the initial error being accidental, that it's hard to believe that the company wouldn't notice the ballot screen being gone for a full year.  Add to that the background that Microsoft had seen its market share disintegrate after the browser screen went live, and the picture painted is rather incriminating.

Microsoft has struggled in the past with the region's stricter antitrust laws.  It recently lost its appeal to vacate a €899M fine, although the EC did kindly reduce it to a mere €860M ($1.1B USD).  The software giant has paid close to $2B USD in total fines to the European union for antitrust offenses.  

Microsoft is also being investigated for API abuse, following claims by third party browser makers that they were being "excluded" from the ARM-architecture-compatible version of Windows 8.

Source: EU



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: pic?
By JasonMick (blog) on 10/24/2012 1:36:11 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Somehow I don't picture Tiffany being that attractive.
You can think that; but you could be very wrong and never get to find out. ;)

As for me, a gentleman never tells so my response is, "No comment."


RE: pic?
By HoosierEngineer5 on 10/24/2012 1:54:29 PM , Rating: 2
Some may wonder if they are alter-egos. We demand proof.


RE: pic?
By corduroygt on 10/24/2012 2:04:57 PM , Rating: 2
So will you keep being a gentleman that never tells or should we get 4chan to get her home address and phone number :)
(just kidding)


RE: pic?
By FITCamaro on 10/24/2012 5:13:26 PM , Rating: 2
Stupidity isn't attractive no matter how big their boobs are, how flat their stomachs are, or how pretty the face is.


RE: pic?
By adiposity on 10/24/2012 6:01:23 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, but those other things are.


RE: pic?
By corduroygt on 10/24/2012 11:24:04 PM , Rating: 2
You must be the ugliest person on earth by your standards.


RE: pic?
By FITCamaro on 10/25/2012 7:02:41 AM , Rating: 2
Hey pot, meet kettle.


RE: pic?
By CityZen on 10/25/2012 4:28:01 AM , Rating: 2
I'm surprised nobody googled her pic. This seems to be Tiffany: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-yb09uyOTLl0/Ti2...


RE: pic?
By kattanna on 10/25/2012 11:23:49 AM , Rating: 2
“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki