Print 76 comment(s) - last by RLR.. on Jul 10 at 8:01 PM

The floating nuclear reactors would provide power and heat to Arctic regions

Russia's Atomic Power Agency and an Arctic military shipbuilding plant have both agreed to build the world's first commercial floating nuclear fission reactor, which should be in use in as early as 2010.  The first floating reactor that Rosenergoatom and Sevmash build is estimated to cost around $336 million -- it will be deployed in a remote, sparsely-populated region on Siberia's northern coast, where electric and thermal supply is very limited.  Russian president Vladimir Putin hopes to bump the nation's electricity generated by nuclear reactors from 17 percent to 25 percent.   

Although Russian authorities believe floating nuclear plants are safe, not everyone is as supportive.  Environmentalists like Charles Digges, editor of a Norwegian and Russian arctic nuclear publication, believes that floating nuclear plants are "absolutely unsafe - inherently so."  However, the head of Russia's Federal Atomic Power Agency has dismissed all criticism while saying that there will not be a floating Chernobyl incident.

Nuclear fission isn't the only game in town anymore.  ITER, JT-60 and EAST are all racing to increase the world's knowledge on nuclear fusion as well.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: How to do it
By Kim Leo on 6/20/2006 9:26:29 AM , Rating: 2
you can't really compare a car to a nuclear reactor, the only thing they have in common is that they both pollute..

reading some of these posts sure have thought(teached?) me a couple of things, but are still hoping for other and better solutions. i live en danmark and everything with nuclear written on it, is banned, we still have diesel submarines :D and we produce more energy that we can handle, we sell some of it to our neighbours, i'm not so much into what we have here in Denmark, just know that some of it is windmills, we love them :D.

RE: How to do it
By masher2 on 6/20/2006 9:42:02 AM , Rating: 2
> " i'm not so much into what we have here in Denmark, just know that some of it is windmills"

About 10% is wind. Over 80% of your power is generated from fossil fuels...mostly from burning oil and imported coal.

Coal-fired electricity generation is, of course, far more polluting than either driving a car or running a nuclear reactor.

RE: How to do it
By NT78stonewobble on 6/21/2006 5:34:58 AM , Rating: 2
Rart med en anden dansker her.

My compason with the car was that, on a large scale, cars do kill thousands if not millions of people every year.

Alone in the USA I think there around 40000 deaths related to car accidents. Then add to that the diseases cause by the cars emissions of heavy metals. Lead and stuff...

Not everything nuclear has been banned from Denmark. I am sad though that they have closed down our Risoe experimental reactor. Afaik we have a nuclear waste problem there. Additionally theres used radioactive materials in the hospitals and the universities.

PS: Thx for the correction on the natural nuclear reactors.

"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki