backtop


Print 76 comment(s) - last by RLR.. on Jul 10 at 8:01 PM

The floating nuclear reactors would provide power and heat to Arctic regions

Russia's Atomic Power Agency and an Arctic military shipbuilding plant have both agreed to build the world's first commercial floating nuclear fission reactor, which should be in use in as early as 2010.  The first floating reactor that Rosenergoatom and Sevmash build is estimated to cost around $336 million -- it will be deployed in a remote, sparsely-populated region on Siberia's northern coast, where electric and thermal supply is very limited.  Russian president Vladimir Putin hopes to bump the nation's electricity generated by nuclear reactors from 17 percent to 25 percent.   

Although Russian authorities believe floating nuclear plants are safe, not everyone is as supportive.  Environmentalists like Charles Digges, editor of a Norwegian and Russian arctic nuclear publication, believes that floating nuclear plants are "absolutely unsafe - inherently so."  However, the head of Russia's Federal Atomic Power Agency has dismissed all criticism while saying that there will not be a floating Chernobyl incident.

Nuclear fission isn't the only game in town anymore.  ITER, JT-60 and EAST are all racing to increase the world's knowledge on nuclear fusion as well.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Floating disaster
By Pirks on 6/19/2006 9:48:35 PM , Rating: -1
quote:
they built a Shuttle-killer design, one of the most astoundingly high-tech, fuel efficient and safe aircraft


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Buran

quote:
They just never get the financial side right, commercialization right, or other implementation right.
Common situation in Russian history after 1917 - talented engineers and lunatic government bound on bringing commy dictatorship everywhere. Looking at Russian weapons and other stuff like Buran I feel Harry Truman probably did the right thing when he stopped them in 1945 with a couple of A-bomb demos. Too bad Japanese were the victims - but who knows how many Americans or Europeans could've been killed by Russian commies had Americans not demonstrated the power of the Bomb and said "do not touch us or else..."


RE: Floating disaster
By emboss on 6/20/2006 1:28:16 AM , Rating: 2
You do know that the Russians and the US were on the same side in WW2, right?


RE: Floating disaster
By masher2 (blog) on 6/20/2006 8:00:22 AM , Rating: 2
> "You do know that the Russians and the US were on the same side in WW2, right? "

Barely so. The two sides nearly went to war directly upon conclusion of WW2...and the final days of the war itself were primarily squabbling over which bits of the Axis empire each side would retain.

Pirks is correct. The atomic bomb detonations were as much a demonstration for the Soviets as for the Japanese.


RE: Floating disaster
By Pirks on 6/20/06, Rating: -1
"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki