Print 76 comment(s) - last by RLR.. on Jul 10 at 8:01 PM

The floating nuclear reactors would provide power and heat to Arctic regions

Russia's Atomic Power Agency and an Arctic military shipbuilding plant have both agreed to build the world's first commercial floating nuclear fission reactor, which should be in use in as early as 2010.  The first floating reactor that Rosenergoatom and Sevmash build is estimated to cost around $336 million -- it will be deployed in a remote, sparsely-populated region on Siberia's northern coast, where electric and thermal supply is very limited.  Russian president Vladimir Putin hopes to bump the nation's electricity generated by nuclear reactors from 17 percent to 25 percent.   

Although Russian authorities believe floating nuclear plants are safe, not everyone is as supportive.  Environmentalists like Charles Digges, editor of a Norwegian and Russian arctic nuclear publication, believes that floating nuclear plants are "absolutely unsafe - inherently so."  However, the head of Russia's Federal Atomic Power Agency has dismissed all criticism while saying that there will not be a floating Chernobyl incident.

Nuclear fission isn't the only game in town anymore.  ITER, JT-60 and EAST are all racing to increase the world's knowledge on nuclear fusion as well.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By bru on 6/19/2006 4:13:19 AM , Rating: 2
ok so what are all those nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers........dont they count as floating or something.

RE: first....?
By leonowski on 6/19/2006 4:16:14 AM , Rating: 5
You're right!

I get my local power from the submarine 2 blocks away. It's AWESOME!

RE: first....?
By bru on 6/19/2006 4:25:46 AM , Rating: 2
You're right!

I get my local power from the submarine 2 blocks away. It's AWESOME! obviously if the heading of this article had been "Russia to Build World's First Floating Nuclear Power Station" then your comment might have actually had some merrit..... :-)

RE: first....?
By KristopherKubicki on 6/19/2006 5:08:14 AM , Rating: 2
Technically that wouldn't have been right either. I changed the title though anyway to something a little more specific.

RE: first....?
By jtdwab on 6/19/2006 12:23:45 PM , Rating: 2
If say just for commercial power generation then they will be the first to complete one but they were not the first with the idea. As I remember this type of design was started back in teh 70's when we were building nuclear plants as fast as we could. I believe the GE but maybe some other large company. They started construction in Jacksonville FL. Then a well known almost disaster occured at Three Mile Island that stoped all desire for nuclear power in the US. The closed down sometime after.

RE: first....?
By Ulfhednar on 6/25/2006 2:02:47 PM , Rating: 2
Since when were nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers "commercial" reactors? Read before you post!

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki