backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by Lakku.. on Jun 15 at 10:08 PM

Raza Microelectronics will acquire the Alchemy product lineup, hints at future AMD products

AMD and Raza Microelectronics have announced a new strategic partnership. The new strategic partnership will transfer AMD’s Alchemy processor product line to Raza Microelectronics, or RMI. Alchemy processors are MIPS processors typically used for embedded products such as the Jack PC and various handheld devices. Raza Microelectronics is a fab-less semiconductor company (FLSC) that produces a line of MIPS processors. With the new partnership Raza Microelectronics will take over the complete product lineup while AMD becomes an investor in Raza Microelectronics.

After the transfer is complete AMD’s processor lineup will consist of all x86 compatible processors (Geode, Athlon, Opteron, Sempron, Turion) while Raza Microelectronics will expand its MIPS processor lineup with the new Alchemy acquisition.

Atiq Raza, Raza Microelectronics chairman, added "RMI endorses AMD64 as the innovation platform for the industry, and fully embraces the Torrenza ecosystem development initiative.”  How Raza Microelectronics will embrace Torrenza technology was not mentioned.  AMD has mentioned that the company will offer embedded processors for its K8L architecture, and by using HTX and HT-3 interconnects from its K8L processors.  The push to consolidate all of AMD's interests into a MIPs-only corporation is perhaps the largest moved by AMD thus far to prove its commitment to the co-processor model.

Both companies are working on a seamless transition process to ease the transition processor for AMD Alchemy customers. There’s no word on whether Raza Microelectronics will continue to market under the Alchemy name or use its own product naming.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: CO-PROCESSOR
By Lakku on 6/15/2006 10:08:17 PM , Rating: 2
While it's hard to say whether the lag during 'intensive moments' is not due to the PCI bus, it should be noted that GRAW, the game you speak of, is a software physics driven game with Ageia slapped onto it. Hence, it was not intended to use a PPU and actually used Havoc as its software physics. It's a poor example I believe, and though I am not here to defend Ageia, CellFactor without a PPU, at least the new one with cloth effects etc., performs poorly. So, in that showcase, the PPU makes a difference on performence, though everyone still seems to always use GRAW without looking underneath the surface to look for what may be causing the issue. Essentially, it's probably a case of adding extra effects on top of the software solution, meaning there is going to be overhead as both systems, instead of just one, are working on the same scene. Is this the case? I can't say for sure, but the PPU makes a difference in CF and no matter the case, I would much rather have a dedicated PPU as opposed to using an old or second graphics card, or using 'spare' graphics power to do physics. Either way, I'd like to see a PCI-e version of the PPU before any other conclusions are made.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki