Print 90 comment(s) - last by RMTimeKill.. on Jun 30 at 3:10 PM

Time for humans to start thinking about moving says Hawking

For many years humans have dreamed of one day colonizing other planets and moons.  Although research would be an important reason for the foreign bases, could the survival of the human race depend on whether or not we can colonize other planets?  World-renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking recently said that humans need to colonize a planet or moon because the Earth might face destruction -- A man made disaster -- global warming being a good example -- or natural disaster could potentially destroy the planet. 

Although he believes humans can colonize the moon within 20 years, and establish a sufficient base on Mars within 40 years, humans "won't find anywhere as nice as Earth," unless we visit another solar system.  The moon looks to be like an ideal place for a potential new colony.  Not only does it appear to have everything needed to sustain humans, ice has also been found at its poles.

Nations have been thinking about colonizing other planets for years.  DailyTech earlier reported that NASA is working towards a permanent moon base that would be a stepping stone to allow astronauts to explore Mars firsthand.  Swedish researchers are also studying different ways to have a self-sustaining colony on the moon.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Cut and Run
By masher2 on 6/15/2006 3:01:33 PM , Rating: 3
> "couldn't we spend far less effort keeping Earth habitable"

No amount of effort will stop the possibility of a rogue meteor strike, randomly-mutated killer virus, cosmological Gamma-Ray-Burst, or any number of other events which could easily end all human life on earth.

Furthermore, colonies on the moon or in space would actually help keep the EARTH habitable. Polluting heavy industry could be moved off the planet altogether. Do all our mining, refining, and chemical manufacture in space, and ship down only the end result. No more pollution, and a higher standard of living for all.

RE: Cut and Run
By kaoken on 6/16/2006 3:33:21 AM , Rating: 2
So what happens to the workers that work on these "heavy industry planets"? Sounds very unethical to me.

RE: Cut and Run
By masher2 on 6/16/2006 8:51:01 AM , Rating: 2
> "Sounds very unethical to me. "

Are you serious with this claptrap? The moon has no meteorological activity, and nearly no geological. any pollution generated is going to stay where its left. Also, remember people are going to be living in sealed habitats there.

Heavy industry in space is even better. Any unwanted byproducts you generate, you simply launch out into the void, or drop them towards the sun.

Now, lets see how long it takes some idiot to say we'd then be "polluting space".

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007
Related Articles
NASA Works On Permanent Moon Base
March 27, 2006, 5:35 AM
Swedish Plan to Colonise Space
March 16, 2006, 2:20 AM

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki