Print 90 comment(s) - last by RMTimeKill.. on Jun 30 at 3:10 PM

Time for humans to start thinking about moving says Hawking

For many years humans have dreamed of one day colonizing other planets and moons.  Although research would be an important reason for the foreign bases, could the survival of the human race depend on whether or not we can colonize other planets?  World-renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking recently said that humans need to colonize a planet or moon because the Earth might face destruction -- A man made disaster -- global warming being a good example -- or natural disaster could potentially destroy the planet. 

Although he believes humans can colonize the moon within 20 years, and establish a sufficient base on Mars within 40 years, humans "won't find anywhere as nice as Earth," unless we visit another solar system.  The moon looks to be like an ideal place for a potential new colony.  Not only does it appear to have everything needed to sustain humans, ice has also been found at its poles.

Nations have been thinking about colonizing other planets for years.  DailyTech earlier reported that NASA is working towards a permanent moon base that would be a stepping stone to allow astronauts to explore Mars firsthand.  Swedish researchers are also studying different ways to have a self-sustaining colony on the moon.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Sheer nonsense.
By masher2 on 6/15/2006 2:56:44 PM , Rating: 3
> "If Earth's woes come from outside then just how far away from Earth must these survivors/colonists be? "

The further, the better. So we should start as soon as possible, no?

> "if we can use solar or clean technologies on the moon or Mars, why not use them here on Earth?"

For reasons which should be obvious, solar power on Luna is far more viable than it will ever be on Earth. In any case, "clean power" is only one tiny part of the equation. A lunar colony is insulated from a huge variety of Terran-based disasters, both natural and manmade.

Sure we could get *almost* as much safety by building domes on the bottom of the ocean...but such a dome would exist ONLY for safety considerations. What would people do down there? But on the Moon, they can be members of a thriving, productive economy...many industrial processes can be done cheaper and easier there than they can here. There is access to a vast amount of raw resources. Eventually, mining and other dirty industries could be moved off the earth entirely.

Finally, a lunar colony is a first step towards going further. Colonies on Mars, Ganymede, or even space itself. And then, mankind would truly no longer have "all its eggs in one basket", where a single errant meteor or natural disaster could end it forever.

“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads
Related Articles
NASA Works On Permanent Moon Base
March 27, 2006, 5:35 AM
Swedish Plan to Colonise Space
March 16, 2006, 2:20 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki