Print 112 comment(s) - last by Cheesew1z69.. on Oct 24 at 6:49 PM

Google is looking to one-up that iPad's Retina display

Apple may be looking to crush the competition's hopes of taking over the 7" tablet market with its upcoming iPad Mini, but Google is looking to grab a few headlines of its own on Monday, October 29.
According to The Next Web, Google will officially unveil a 32GB version of its popular Nexus 7 tablet. The device has already turned up in stores across the U.S. and some lucky people have even been able to purchase the device, which is priced at $249 (the same price as the previous 16GB model). In addition, there will also be another 32GB Nexus 7 that will feature 3G connectivity. This device will most likely be aimed right at Amazon's 8.9" Kindle Fire HD LTE 4G (say that three times fast).

The star of the show, however, will be Google's new 10" tablet that was developed in conjunction with Samsung. This tablet will come bearing Android 4.2 (still operating under the Jelly Bean codename) and a Retina-surpassing resolution of 2560x1600 (300 ppi). Apple's "New iPad" features a screen resolution of 2048x1536 (264 ppi).
The device will likely be called the Nexus 10. We don't have any specs to report on at this time other than the screen, but we can only assume that it'll be packing a quad-core processor and at least 64GB of storage space at the high-end.

Source: The Next Web

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By GreyMulkin on 10/21/2012 6:13:56 PM , Rating: 2
Is a 10" nexus tablet something to be excited about? Sure.

You can't say the same about such high resolution. I would much prefer having the hardware operate more capably with a ~200ppi screen.

or even better, find a way to get full 24-bit rgb out of an e-ink display.

RE: ridiculous
By ritualm on 10/21/2012 7:30:27 PM , Rating: 3
I think not.

It's not a matter of 'create something idiot-proof and the stupid will find ways to break it'. It's about pushing the upper limits of hardware performance, showing what can be done with existing stuff, and creating demand for future hardware that can operate at such high levels idle instead of max load.

What the 2012 (large) iPad really did was drive home the need of a smaller process node for high-performance handheld computing; the MBPR made hardware scalers past 2560 x 1600 in GPUs a requirement. Never mind that 4K2K is a few years from hitting the marketplace and very few existing systems can handle that right now.

Remember AMD's EyeFinity in the 5000-series GPUs? It wasn't about multi-display gaming, its goal was the Holodeck, and 100 million pixels in 180 degrees surround mode is likely an underestimate. Flight simulation training systems already use such tech to simulate a real plane's cockpit. In a few years the tech will be good enough to train USAF pilots without losing jets that routinely cost $100M-apiece.

High resolution isn't just about displaying more pixel data than our eyes can see, it's about enabling more functional than gimmicky interactive tech. Don't worry, we'll find ways of making full use of ever-increasing display pixel counts.

RE: ridiculous
By B3an on 10/21/12, Rating: 0
RE: ridiculous
By retrospooty on 10/22/2012 8:41:30 AM , Rating: 2
Not any recent build. Its fast now, and being a Nexus it will be released on the latest build.

RE: ridiculous
By NellyFromMA on 10/22/2012 1:09:00 PM , Rating: 2
In theory, yes. Here's an analogy to support the claim:

Multi-core processors and multi-threaded apps. Today, only now do applications use multi-threading in semi-useful ways. This was for a number of reasons, but primarily, because the hardware wasn't out en masse. It took a good 10 years (feels like) for the hardware to be in the masses enough for devs to actually have incentive to thoroughly explore the functionality.

Businesses don't make money catering to hardware that isn't largely available EXCEPT if your customers are in a niche group. Particularly if you can charge an associated premium.

People will find use for the higher res. Just expect it to take awhile. Probably not 10 years since multi-threading is obviously more complicated than higher-res images.

Lucky for Win 8 the majority of content will scale up automatically.

Does anyone know if Android interfaces support SVG or some dirivitive? The same supportive claim would be true for Android then as well, but I wasn't sure.

RE: ridiculous
By TakinYourPoints on 10/22/2012 1:23:04 AM , Rating: 1
You can't say the same about such high resolution. I would much prefer having the hardware operate more capably with a ~200ppi screen.

It is definitely a problem with the less efficient OS and slower graphics hardware available on the Android platform. Even if it isn't there now it should be in a year. High DPI is nothing to fight against.

RE: ridiculous
By Moishe on 10/23/2012 11:21:52 AM , Rating: 1
I agree with you. The resolution is cool. The 10" is cool. It's not a bad idea, but this really is a dick measuring contest between Google and Apple.

The up-side is that heavy competition means cheap tablets for us consumers.

I do think the resolution is pointless for most people. Like the Ghz wars, most people only need/want/use the slower ones for the price.

"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki