backtop


Print 80 comment(s) - last by titanmiller.. on Oct 22 at 6:23 PM

4K resolution hardware will officially be called ultra HD

The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) has announced the official name for the next generation 4K high-definition display technology: "Ultra High-Definition" or "Ultra HD." According to the CEA, the name is intended to infer the new format's superiority over conventional HDTV.

The CEA Board of Industry Leaders voted unanimously this week to recommend the previously mentioned names for the new next-generation HD resolution. Along with agreeing on a name, the CEA also outlined minimal performance characteristics to help consumers and retailers understand the benefit of the new technology set to begin rolling out this fall.

“Ultra HD is the next natural step forward in display technologies, offering consumers an incredibly immersive viewing experience with outstanding new levels of picture quality,” said Gary Shapiro, president and CEO, CEA. “This new terminology and the recommended attributes will help consumers navigate the marketplace to find the TV that best meets their needs.”

The core characteristics that the CEA agreed on include a minimum display resolution of at least 8 million active pixels with at least 3840 pixels horizontal and at least 2160 vertical pixels.

To meet the minimum needs the display will have to have an aspect ratio of at least 16 x 9. Devices meeting the specifications will also be required to have at least one digital input capable of carrying and presenting native 4K format video at 3840 x 2160 resolution without relying on upconverting.

Source: CE.org



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By bupkus on 10/19/2012 4:35:42 PM , Rating: 2
On the presumption that businesses get a tax break when investing in R&D it is to allow reduced risk to staying out front with advancing technology and business methods.

When consumers make more money they either save or buy bigger and better shit. Some actually do save and even use that money to advance their own education.

So if I am to argue in favor of the middle class on what do I base my arguments? Can I argue that the middle need super fuckin high res TVs? It's beyond embarrassing. That kind of resolution may be great for communicating medical imaging but should we consumers lust for this kind of crap? And before you give me the argument of how hard you work and that it's none of my business, which by the way I agree with, let me compare this to the obese citizen who eats 2x his normal intake but with 90" TVs you don't show your overindulgence when wearing a bathing suit.

So... I know I don't need or even want that. Should I think you should follow my lead? Hell no. When you lose your job and need to sell your shit at almost give away prices I'll be there pickin it up.

Okey, what's my point?
Hey, this is DT; I don't need one a point.

P.S. Deleted




By Shadowself on 10/19/2012 6:44:42 PM , Rating: 2
Of course no one needs a 4K television. Hell, my life would probably go on just fine with a 720p or 480i television or even the 525 line analog TV (NTSC's original format) -- or maybe even no television at all (at least I would not be watching all those political ads!).

4K or 8K monitors for things like medical x-rays? Yes, they're probably needed there. Believe it or not, there are limited cases where 300k x 300k sensors are needed.


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki