Print 104 comment(s) - last by TakinYourPoint.. on Oct 17 at 4:27 PM

Microsoft targets iPad pricing

Microsoft has gone official with pricing on its Surface RT tablets. Most people have been hoping the Microsoft Surface RT tablets would come in at less than Apple’s hugely popular iPad. However, Microsoft’s pricing puts Surface in close competition with comparable third generation iPads and higher than the iPad 2.
The 32GB Windows Surface RT tablet without the Black Touch cover, which also doubles as a keyboard, is $499. That makes it $100 more expensive than the entry-level Apple iPad 2 at $399. The $499 entry price for the Surface RT tablet puts it on par with pricing for the 16GB “New iPad”.
If you want the Touch Cover with its integrated keyboard, that option is $100 when you order, or $119.99 as an add-on later. You can pre-order the 32GB version with the cover for $599.
The third version has 64 GB of storage and ships with the Touch Cover – it will cost you $699. Any of the three tablet versions can be pre-ordered today with delivery expected by October 26.
Analysts seem to think that Windows 8 tablet pricing is too expensive, however, what do you guys think?
In other Surface news, you can catch Microsoft’s first ad for the new tablet here:

Source: Microsoft

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: stupid stupid price
By TakinYourPoints on 10/16/2012 9:55:01 PM , Rating: 2
I know exactly how its possible: More carriers with a huge range of cheaper devices. iOS internet traffic and app downloads make well almost two thirds of the mobile market, despite the fact that iOS makes up about a third of mobile devices out there. Google themselves testified in Congress that the bulk of their mobile revenue comes from iOS, not Android.

Lots of people have Android devices but many of them aren't on flagship devices, plain and simple. They aren't using them much more than they would a regular dumbphone. This matters to developers.

The large userbase is the only reason it is the #2 mobile development platform. If we were going by quality then Windows Phone would be far past it, given the fact that it has hands down the best SDK out there. Its low userbase, and thus lower potential for profits, means that it isn't the case.

Popular != good. Justin Beiber is one of the most popular artists in the world, that doesn't mean he's great.

RE: stupid stupid price
By Reclaimer77 on 10/16/2012 10:32:49 PM , Rating: 2
Very good excuses. Points for creativity.

This matters to developers.

I love how you think what developers think is more important than the end users. You're always bringing up developers and it's always a straw man. If Android only had a few thousands apps, sure that would be something. But as long as Android has a thriving app inventory and I can do everything I need to do, which I can, I could frankly give a damn about how much developers are making off which platform.

The large userbase is the only reason it is the #2 mobile development platform.

Duh? I believe I covered this when I brought up Androids market share. Somehow in your mind this disproves me lol.

If we were going by quality then Windows Phone would be far past it, given the fact that it has hands down the best SDK out there.

Right, Windows Phone. Which still doesn't have several of the "killer apps" being enjoyed by Android and iOS users. Once again things that nobody cares about outside of developers, you seem to think is important to everyone.

You want to have your cake and eat it too. And it's really amusing seeing you go through mental gymnastics to explain away things you don't like, and make excuses for things you do.

RE: stupid stupid price
By TakinYourPoints on 10/17/2012 4:27:11 PM , Rating: 2
It is really quite simple.

A popular platform gets applications no matter how difficult it is to develop for.

Developers generally dislike developing for Android because of piracy, software and hardware fragmentation, and dealing with resulting compatibility issues, all for less profit because Android users are less likely to pay up.

An unpopular platform doesn't get apps even if it is super simple to develop great apps for.

That is a separate point from why Android is popular, which is again is because it was earlier to market with cheap or free devices on almost every carrier. It doesn't mean that it is a good platform to develop for. The only one worse to develop for is BlackBerry. The userbase is the only reason Android development is as big as it is, which is impressive given how bad developing for it is in almost every way.

Its a simple point, even someone like you should be able to grasp it.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki