backtop


Print 20 comment(s) - last by Motoman.. on Oct 5 at 9:59 AM


  (Source: T-Mobile USA)
Merger will create a strong fourth player in the U.S. market

When AT&T’s (T$39B acquisition of Deutsche Telekom AG (ETR:DTE) subsidiary T-Mobile USA was shot down by U.S. regulators on antitrust grounds, many feared regulators may have wasted their effort as T-Mobile USA was on the verge of financial failure.  Indeed, recent layoffs and customer defections seemed to confirm the worst.

I. Merger Strengthens T-Mobile USA

But in a surprising, MetroPCS Communications Inc. (PCS) and T-Mobile USA announced today that they would be merging into a single value carrier.  The deal is slightly complicated financially, but the big picture is that T-Mobile USA will remain independent, although MetroPCS and T-Mobile may be able to enjoy some joint marketing pitches.

The move can be viewed as a partial acquisition of MetroPCS by Deutsche Telecom, which will then be merged it into its struggling U.S. unit T-Mobile.

The financial side of the deal involves MetroPCS splitting its stock (doubling the number of shares), then paying $1.5B USD in direct cash to Deutsche Telecom shareholders, and handing over 74 percent of its stock to Deutsche Telecom shareholders.  The combined company (T-Mobile USA + MetroPCS) will have $15B USD in combined unsecured debt notes, and Deutsche Telecom will "provide a $5.5 billion backstop commitment for certain MetroPCS third-party financing transactions."

The deal creates a new carrier with a projected 42.5m subscribers, $24.8B in revenue, $6.3B of adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP earnings), $4.2B in capital expenditures, and $2.1B of free cash flow (defined as EBITDA less capital expenditures) in 2012.

II. A Different Deal

It is a substantially different route compared to the AT&T deal, which involved a $39B USD cash/stock payment to Deutsche Telecom.  That deal would have merged T-Mobile's roughly 30 million customers with AT&T's roughly 100 million customers to produce a mega carrier with 130+ million customers.

MetroPCS was long eyeing a tie-up with T-Mobile USA, and had looked to potentially purchase certain assets/subscriber contracts from the carrier had the AT&T deal been approved.

The new merger makes T-Mobile USA bear a closer resemblance to Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) which has roughly 52 million subscribers (as of Q2) and also has contract-free offerings under the Boost Mobile and Virgin Mobile brands.

The merger also puts pressure on AT&T and Verizon Wireless (a joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Vodafone Group Plc. (LON:VOD)).  It also brings the promise of revived financials to T-Mobile USA.  Versus T-Mobile who has long bled money, MetroPCS has a culture of success, posting an impressive $148M USD profit last quarter.

T-Mobile has been stepping up its HSPA+ efforts, but this "3.5G" tech has struggled to compete against the bleeding edge at AT&T and Verizon Wireless -- both of whom have deployed "4G" LTE.  That said, it offers some of the best value plans in the industry.

Some details of the deal -- for example how the executive leadership will shake down -- remain unknown, and of course the purchase has to pass regulatory scrutiny.  T-Mobile USA recently named John Legere, a three-decade telecom industry veteran, as its new CEO, replacing CEO-of-two-years Phillip Humm who left to become CEO of Verizon Wireless parent Vodafone Europe.

Assuming it gets approved, though, the net result of this merger is simple -- more competition in the mobile market.

Source: BusinessWire



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Service Options
By IS81 on 10/3/2012 9:53:08 PM , Rating: 2
First, see the response below. Second, I neglected to make clear that in-person service is more of a "last resort" when other service options fail, but sometimes a necessary and much appreciated last resort.

I've had some good service experiences over the phone during those same 15 years for dealing with RMAs, utilities, and even cable/satellite companies.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki