Samsung Alleges in New Filing That Apple's iPhone 5 Infringes on Its Patents
October 2, 2012 1:01 PM
comment(s) - last by
Samsung accuses the latest Apple product of violating two cellular and six utility (mobile OS) patents.
, Samsung Electronic Comp., Ltd. (
) has filed an amendment to its patent infringement countersuit against Apple, Inc. (
) in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
the iPhone 5
infringes on six of its patents.
I. Samsung Alleges iPhone 5 Infringement
Two of those patents involve the 3G UMTS standard (which Apple may be free to license at a low rate as they are
FRAND standards patents
The other six patents are more dangerous, however, since they are utility patents and hence Samsung has no licensing obligations to Apple. Those patents are:
U.S. Patent No. 7,672,470
(filed: 2004; granted: 2010; covers: volume control)
U.S. Patent No. 7,577,757
(filed: 2006; granted: 2009; covers: multimedia synchronization)
U.S. Patent No. 7,232,058
(filed: 2004; granted: 2007; covers: compact data display/notifications)
U.S. Patent No. 6,292,179
(filed: 1999; granted: 2001; covers: touch keyboard)
U.S. Patent No. 6,226,449
(filed: 1997; granted: 2001; covers: image/voice recording)
U.S. Patent No. 5,579,239
(filed: 1994; granted: 1996; covers: video calling/compression)
Samsung claims Apple's new sixth-generation iPhone infringes on all of these patents.
II. Adding to the Existing Dispute Doesn't Necessarily Mean a Loss for Samsung
The phonemaker wants to inject its new iPhone 5 accusations into its partially-complete current case, replacing a placeholder in the original filing referring to future products. Samsung claims, "judicial resources will be preserved" by this approach. The decision would also benefit Samsung by allowing it to potentially achieve a rapid ban on the iPhone 5 if
Judge Paul S. Grewal
or other judges in the case decide in Samsung's favor.
Recall that in its
previous legal loss
to Apple in the same court, a jury ruled that Apple's previous iPhones did not infringe on any of these Samsung patents, while finding Samsung to infringe on virtually every Apple patent asserted.
However, substantial questions regarding that ruling have been raised on several grounds -- notably that at least one juror had family members who were large Apple shareholders, that the jury was given a massive amount of arguments to consider in a narrow time window, and that some jury instructions appeared to have been biased towards Apple.
In that regard, Samsung's Aug. 24 loss before the jury may not necessary mirror the outcome in this second phase.
Samsung hopes for a better result in rount two of its Californian federal court dispute with Apple.
[Image Source: Android Authority]
Apple recently sought to
triple the damages against Samsung
to $3B USD on the grounds that jurors found Samsung's infringement to be willful. Apple is also pushing the court to
ban most of Samsung's Android smartphones
from sale in the U.S.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California via The Verge/SBNation [PDF]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: this is getting old...
10/4/2012 10:17:45 AM
It's like you think Woz's opinion means anything in the logical world.
When all you can do to defend a point of view is to point out someone else with that same point of view, you've already failed.
The difference, as I've illustrated above - is that all companies take inspiration but add their own value without infringing design patents, utility patents and trade dress. Samsung didn't. They just copied. They forgot to 'build off the successful ideas' - they just
the successful and patented ideas.
They also tried to ban the 4S over 3G patents - with zero success, and now trying to ban the 5 over LTE patents. That strategy existed way before the result of this court case. To try and excuse a company who seeks bans over FRAND patents repeatedly, and blatantly rips off an entire product range to the tune of $1bn in damages - is quite frankly ridiculous.
RE: this is getting old...
10/4/2012 1:24:18 PM
Woz's opinion was added and is relevant as someone with inside knowledge if the industry, invention, tech products, and Apple the company itself. Your opinion is the one that means nothing.
"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs
Quick Note: Apple Sells 5 Million iPhone 5s During Launch Weekend
September 24, 2012, 9:08 AM
Samsung Plans to Add iPhone 5 to Existing Patent Suits Against Apple
September 20, 2012, 9:17 AM
Apple Goes for the Jugular, Asks Judge to Triple Samsung Damages to $3B
September 19, 2012, 12:24 PM
Apple Moves to Ban More Samsung Devices in U.S.; Samsung "Mimicry" Questioned in South Korea
September 4, 2012, 11:44 AM
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information