backtop


Print 79 comment(s) - last by rommelrommel.. on Oct 2 at 5:06 AM

No contract after nearly a year of negotiations

Negotiations between the U.S. government and Lockheed Martin over the $400 billion F-35 Lightning II program have been tense. Defense News reports that one deputy program manager said that the relationship between the Department of Defense and Lockheed is "the worst I have ever seen." 
 
After that comment was made, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated, "I don't know that I would portray it in those terms. These are difficult negotiations, as they always are when you're dealing with the amount of money and the complexity that's involved with the Joint Strike Fighter."
 
Defense News reports that last week Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter put his support behind comments made by Air Force Major General Christopher Bogdan. Bogdan had harsh words for Lockheed Martin’s failure to sign a contract with the Pentagon for 32 F-35 fighters after almost a year of negotiations.
 
However, Panetta does not agree that the relationship between the U.S. government Lockheed is the worst he's ever seen.


Lockheed F-35B Lightning II fighters [Source: Lockheed Martin]
 
“I don't share it, number one, because … I don't know the history of just how much has gone on in the past,” Panetta said. “But at least from what I have seen at this point, my view of it is these are very tough negotiations, but they aren't a reflection that either side has given up or thinks that the other side, you know, is in a more difficult state at all.”
 
Panetta is also reportedly unhappy that Congress won't be back in session until after the elections in November. An initial round of budget cuts in defense spending is set to begin in January. With Congress out of session until the elections are over, there is no chance of avoiding or delaying the defense spending cuts.
 
Panetta said, "I'll take whatever the hell deal they can make right now to deal with sequestration. The problem now is that they've left town and all of this has now been put off into the lame duck session."
 
“We need stability,” he said. “You want a strong national defense for this country? I need to have some stability. And that's what I'm asking the Congress to do: Give me some stability with regards to the funding of the Defense Department for the future.”

Source: Defense News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By Kurz on 9/29/2012 9:23:22 AM , Rating: 3
Culture is what destroyed the USSR not bombs.

People want to live peacefully and trade with each other.

People in charge of Governments want more power and express their might. Show your ability to wage war, but never wage it. Be a country of defensive purpose only and people will respect you.


RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By FITCamaro on 9/29/2012 9:37:05 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
People want to live peacefully and trade with each other.


Yeah the people of Iran, Palestine, the Gaza Strip, etc are showing that real well...

quote:
Be a country of defensive purpose only and people will respect you.


Hitler proved that assumption to be false.


RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By Paj on 10/1/2012 10:48:53 AM , Rating: 2
Bit hard to trade when the US and Israel impose sanctions on the other side.


By Ammohunt on 9/30/2012 3:06:01 PM , Rating: 2
That is an extremely naïve way to look at the world but is standard fare from most colleges nowadays so it’s expected. Sorry to say human nature is against you. The threat of total annihilation and insurmountable odds is what won the cold war *Hint: research SDI,MAD and Ronald Reagan. Also want to take a look at why people wages wars your beloved conflict winning culture is responsible for 90% of human disagreement and war.


By knutjb on 9/30/2012 5:39:40 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
People in charge of Governments want more power and express their might. Show your ability to wage war, but never wage it. Be a country of defensive purpose only and people will respect you.
So sit idle while atrocities are committed, like Clinton did in Rawanda which began 3 days after he pulled out troops from Somalia. Or not give hope and change support to those trying to overthrow Iran, or push a albeit bad ally out in Egypt for radical change leading to the easily predictable power shift to a group who supports violence against us. Maybe lead from behind in Libya and not have any say or provide any assistance to prevent the formation of terrorist groups. But hey it's Ok to ignore from afar Syria, no problem there.

Most people do want to live in peace but that can never happen without leadership at the front. You fail to project and stand by your proclaimed morals and values, evil will rise to fill that vacuum. Then you get massive world chaos snowballing, like we have now.

Those who stand idlely by condone evil by their mere failure to recognize it and, more importantly, act against it.

Pershing had it right...


"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki