Print 79 comment(s) - last by rommelrommel.. on Oct 2 at 5:06 AM

No contract after nearly a year of negotiations

Negotiations between the U.S. government and Lockheed Martin over the $400 billion F-35 Lightning II program have been tense. Defense News reports that one deputy program manager said that the relationship between the Department of Defense and Lockheed is "the worst I have ever seen." 
After that comment was made, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated, "I don't know that I would portray it in those terms. These are difficult negotiations, as they always are when you're dealing with the amount of money and the complexity that's involved with the Joint Strike Fighter."
Defense News reports that last week Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter put his support behind comments made by Air Force Major General Christopher Bogdan. Bogdan had harsh words for Lockheed Martin’s failure to sign a contract with the Pentagon for 32 F-35 fighters after almost a year of negotiations.
However, Panetta does not agree that the relationship between the U.S. government Lockheed is the worst he's ever seen.

Lockheed F-35B Lightning II fighters [Source: Lockheed Martin]
“I don't share it, number one, because … I don't know the history of just how much has gone on in the past,” Panetta said. “But at least from what I have seen at this point, my view of it is these are very tough negotiations, but they aren't a reflection that either side has given up or thinks that the other side, you know, is in a more difficult state at all.”
Panetta is also reportedly unhappy that Congress won't be back in session until after the elections in November. An initial round of budget cuts in defense spending is set to begin in January. With Congress out of session until the elections are over, there is no chance of avoiding or delaying the defense spending cuts.
Panetta said, "I'll take whatever the hell deal they can make right now to deal with sequestration. The problem now is that they've left town and all of this has now been put off into the lame duck session."
“We need stability,” he said. “You want a strong national defense for this country? I need to have some stability. And that's what I'm asking the Congress to do: Give me some stability with regards to the funding of the Defense Department for the future.”

Source: Defense News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By bug77 on 9/29/2012 4:02:28 AM , Rating: 2
What you see right now is the exact aftermath of that policy. With a strong economy, the US was able to go to the moon within 10 years. With an ailing economy, we read numerous reports each month about F35's struggles.
You can't realistically focus on being the number one military power, it just comes along with the territory when circumstances are right. Soviet Russia tried to do things the other way around, too and we all know how that ended.

By Jeffk464 on 9/29/2012 9:33:04 AM , Rating: 2
I agree 100%

RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By drycrust3 on 9/29/2012 2:23:12 PM , Rating: 2
You can't realistically focus on being the number one military power, it just comes along with the territory when circumstances are right.

So which path is America going down? I'm not an American, so tell me, is it going down the "China path", i.e. having a military that lives within a budget that is related to what the government can get from its "we can supply the world" working industry in taxes, or is America going down the "Russian path" i.e. having a government where the military budget is decided ignoring the reality of the tax take?

By Jeffk464 on 9/29/2012 3:57:24 PM , Rating: 2
That remains to be seen, the military industrial complex has a ton of influence in washington, especially among republicans. Most likely Obama will be re-elected and at least the current military budget won't be expanded.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki