Print 79 comment(s) - last by rommelrommel.. on Oct 2 at 5:06 AM

No contract after nearly a year of negotiations

Negotiations between the U.S. government and Lockheed Martin over the $400 billion F-35 Lightning II program have been tense. Defense News reports that one deputy program manager said that the relationship between the Department of Defense and Lockheed is "the worst I have ever seen." 
After that comment was made, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated, "I don't know that I would portray it in those terms. These are difficult negotiations, as they always are when you're dealing with the amount of money and the complexity that's involved with the Joint Strike Fighter."
Defense News reports that last week Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter put his support behind comments made by Air Force Major General Christopher Bogdan. Bogdan had harsh words for Lockheed Martin’s failure to sign a contract with the Pentagon for 32 F-35 fighters after almost a year of negotiations.
However, Panetta does not agree that the relationship between the U.S. government Lockheed is the worst he's ever seen.

Lockheed F-35B Lightning II fighters [Source: Lockheed Martin]
“I don't share it, number one, because … I don't know the history of just how much has gone on in the past,” Panetta said. “But at least from what I have seen at this point, my view of it is these are very tough negotiations, but they aren't a reflection that either side has given up or thinks that the other side, you know, is in a more difficult state at all.”
Panetta is also reportedly unhappy that Congress won't be back in session until after the elections in November. An initial round of budget cuts in defense spending is set to begin in January. With Congress out of session until the elections are over, there is no chance of avoiding or delaying the defense spending cuts.
Panetta said, "I'll take whatever the hell deal they can make right now to deal with sequestration. The problem now is that they've left town and all of this has now been put off into the lame duck session."
“We need stability,” he said. “You want a strong national defense for this country? I need to have some stability. And that's what I'm asking the Congress to do: Give me some stability with regards to the funding of the Defense Department for the future.”

Source: Defense News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By Amiga500 on 9/28/2012 1:29:49 PM , Rating: 1
The Government asked Lockheed to build a shit sandwich, and that's essentially what we got.

To a degree I agree.

The need to fit on a LHD elevator is a killer.

It's not Lockheed's fault.

There, I disagree. Lockheed stood up and said they could deliver X, Y and Z.

The powerpoint wizards didn't give a sh!t that X, Y and Z were unattainable, as long as they got the big juicy $$$ contract.

What they should have said was the program will be crippled by requirements A, B and C. It should be split into two programs, completely separate airframes.

But, then they wouldn't have the DoD over a barrel now with a single program that is probably too big to fail as everyone and their dog have been sold up the river on it. I have no doubt that was front and centre in Lockheeds thinking when delivering those bullsh!t powerpoint presentations.

RE: Out to lunch, be back in December
By Reclaimer77 on 9/28/2012 2:06:03 PM , Rating: 2
What they should have said was the program will be crippled by requirements A, B and C. It should be split into two programs, completely separate airframes.

Then they wouldn't have gotten the contract probably.

Lockheed is a business and their objective is to make money. In my business I routinely run across customers asking me to do really stupid things that often end up costing them more money. Oh well, it's not my job to enlighten them.

If you want to blame Lockheed for not educating the people who run the show, people who SHOULD know better, I think that's just scapegoating.

Look the money is spent at this point. All we can do now is just hope to hell the F-35 can be, somehow, made into a viable aircraft. Flipping out about it, calling Americans stupid, etc etc isn't going to do anything positive at this point.

And frankly, I'll repeat myself again, if we destroyed the ENTIRE department of defense, cut every cent of military spending, we would still be looking at a TRILLION dollar deficit!

By Amiga500 on 9/28/2012 5:21:54 PM , Rating: 2
Then they wouldn't have gotten the contract probably.

Absolutely incorrect.

DoD talk to industry all the time to gauge what is possible.

By boeush on 9/28/2012 5:34:01 PM , Rating: 2
Oh well, it's not my job to enlighten them.
May I ask which business you're in?

(So that I can make sure never to do business with you?)

Thanks in advance.

"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki