Print 37 comment(s) - last by Keeir.. on Oct 25 at 9:01 PM

Now your architectural glass can produce power

Sharp Corp. (TYO:6753) announced in a press release a semi-transparent black architectural glass panel that has build in photovoltaic generation (aka solar power) capabilities.

The panel is 4.5-ft. x 3.2ft -- about the size of a glass coffee table.  It is a slender 0.37 in. thick.  Sharp brags the panel is "beautifully in harmony with the building".

The panel is laminated glass infused with semi-transparent thin film solar cells.  The cells both generate power and act as a natural insulator serving as a heat barrier.  Plus their black color could offer an extra degree of privacy to residents in buildings with the panels.

The panel can produce up to 95 watts at 6.8 percent efficiency [source] -- not great, but okay when you consider its multi-utility (construction, privacy, insulation, and generation).

Sharp solar panels
An artist's depiction of a building equipped with the special glass panels. [Image Source: Sharp Japan]

The panel will start shipping in Japan on Oct. 1, but no U.S. date has been announced.  Also not announced was one critical metric -- pricing in Japan.

Sources: Sharp [translated], CNET

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Is 6.5% good or bad?
By aurareturn on 9/26/2012 3:26:34 PM , Rating: 2
I used to work at SunPower Corp. Their solar panels were at 23% efficiency the last time I checked and that was the record. Could be higher now.

Low end solar panels can be anywhere from 12% to 15%.

So no, 6.5% is really bad efficiency but this is a different technology.

RE: Is 6.5% good or bad?
By aurareturn on 9/26/2012 3:29:16 PM , Rating: 2
Correction: SunPower's cells are at 24%. It's still the world record I believe.

RE: Is 6.5% good or bad?
By fic2 on 9/26/2012 4:08:59 PM , Rating: 2
The world record is over 40% efficient. But that is in a lab. If you are talking about available to install, shipping panels then according to this SunPower's panels are in the top at 21%.

RE: Is 6.5% good or bad?
By Keeir on 9/26/2012 10:46:26 PM , Rating: 2
I am pretty sure the "40%" is using concentrators. It kinda becomes difficult to measure the efficieny of this type of panel fairly versus others. Due to the parabolic nature of a concentrator, typically only small (compared to human size) panels are capable of getting these extreme measures, and then the whole apparatus tends be somewhat distored efficieny as typically its power produced/power sent into panel, not the better measurement in my mind of power produced/sunlight disturbed

RE: Is 6.5% good or bad?
By FITCamaro on 9/27/2012 9:05:25 AM , Rating: 2
From what I've read, really expensive solar panels used in satellites also get like 40% efficiency.

RE: Is 6.5% good or bad?
By JPForums on 9/27/2012 1:02:02 PM , Rating: 2
Spectrolab has concentrator cells available that push 40% efficiency.

In house, last I heard, they've hit 48%. Lab samples are less interesting as they have to work out consistency and usability issues. Nobody wants a cell that only produces between 89 and 91 degrees while under temperatures common to Antarctica.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki