backtop


Print 94 comment(s) - last by dasgetier.. on Sep 27 at 2:39 PM

SBB is reportedly looking to make a deal with Apple, where the railway company will likely seek a licensing fee

They say "what goes around, comes around" -- and it looks like Apple is finally getting a dose of its own medicine in the patent infringement department.

A railway company in Switzerland, called Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), has accused Apple of copying its clock design for iOS 6. SBB said its company created that clock design back in 1944, and that Apple's new iOS 6 clock app is identical. See for yourself:

[Image Source: Cult of Mac]

"We are proud that this icon of clock design is being used by a globally successful company," said Reto Kormann, SBB spokesperson. "We've approached Apple and told them that the rights for this clock belong to us."

SBB is reportedly looking to make a deal with Apple, where the railway company will likely seek a licensing fee.

Apple just released iOS 6 two days ago, and also launched its iPhone 5 in eight countries today.

SBB's move against Apple comes at an interesting time. After a 1+ year-long battle with Samsung over smartphone/tablet patent infringement lawsuits around the globe, a U.S. jury found Samsung guilty of copying the iPhone/iPad for its Galaxy line. Not only was Samsung ordered to pay $1.05 billion USD in damages, but a court date on December 6 may lead to more product bans for the South Korean electronics maker. Apple is also looking to boost that $1.05 billion fine to $3 billion.

Source: Cult of Mac



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: people
By PrinceGaz on 9/22/2012 3:06:00 PM , Rating: 3
Strictly speaking, the way the phone was pulled out of the pocket in the first test isn't that important as the additional lateral motion and rotation is insignificant compared with the velocity when it first impacts the ground, which is similar in both instances.

The second test is the bad one, as it is clear he drops the iPhone from quite a bit lower than the S3-- you can tell that easily from where his hand is over his t-shirt logo. He drops the iPhone from what he says is 4', which is the height in the middle of the 'Android Authority' logo on his t-shirt that he previously indicated he would do. That happens at about 2m10s in the video.

At 2m55 he drops the S3 but if you look carefully, it isn't released until it is level with the neck-line at the front of his t-shirt which is about 6 inches higher than the height the iPhone was released from. That difference is anything but insignificant, unlike his first drop test.

The reason for doing the drop test to a hard surface from three heights in the 3' to 5'6" range is because that is about the limit of what the devices can take without shattering the screen, and dropping one from 4' and the other from 4'6" pretty much invalidates everything.


RE: people
By Tony Swash on 9/22/2012 4:42:30 PM , Rating: 1
I get your point, you think the dude doing the test wasn't holding the phones right when he dropped them.

The iPhone is still obviously tougher and more durable (as well as considerably faster) than the Samsung Galaxy S3 whatever way you hold it.


RE: people
By Camikazi on 9/26/2012 10:44:05 AM , Rating: 2
No the point he is making is that the guy testing the phones is not testing them equally. You can't get any valid results when the tests are not done in equal (or near equal) conditions.


"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki