"Googorola" Aims to Ban Most Apple Products, Accusing iMessage Infringes
September 21, 2012 7:33 AM
comment(s) - last by
Google says Apple ripped off Motorola's patented messaging technology
crushing court defeat
of Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
), Apple Inc. (
) won a key battle in its fight against Google Inc. (
), but the war remains far from over.
I. Motorola Hit Back
Previously, Google (via
Motorola Mobility) and Apple had fought each other to a standstill with
Judge Richard A. Posner
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
judge moonlighting in the
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
the pair's suits/countersuits with prejudice arguing that both side effectively just wanted to ban the other's products and wasn't looking for legitimate damages.
That stalemate left Google with limited options. However, it is now pursuing its biggest and best opportunity to hurt Apple -- a
U.S. International Trade Commission
complaint. With the complaint Google is looking to hit Apple hard,
banning nearly every single one of its products
, including all its best-selling devices.
The ITC independent investigates patent dispute claims. And as most mobile device makers -- including Apple -- manufacture their products exclusively
, its panel of judges essentially have as much power as a federal judge and jury, as they can order a blockade on imports -- an effective sales ban -- if they feel infringement occurred. That's precisely the route Apple used to temporarily
stifle the sales of Android phonemaker HTC
) in May.
Google is seeking to ban virtually all Apple's devices [Image Source: Apple]
For its new complaint Google-Motorola was careful not to use one of its 3G or 4G patents, which may be illegal to sue Apple with, given that they were
developed for industry standards
. Instead, Google-Motorola is using
U.S. Patent No. 6,983,370
, a broad patent that describes cross-platform messaging to a "plurality of messaging clients". The patent was filed in 2001 and granted to Motorola in 2006 by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Apple may be treading on dangerous ground, given how broad Motorola's patent is. Its best bet may be to try to find cracks in certain Motorola claims and then try to challenge the patent on the grounds of invalid claims construction. Otherwise it could find almost of its products -- the iPhone, most iPods, the iPhone, the iPad, and Mac computers -- banned from import into the U.S.
II. Vague, Yes, But Motorola Could Win
To be clear Google's patent is almost laughably ubiquitous -- it's basically claiming that any messaging client that uses Wi-Fi or cellular data connections is in violation of its patent.
But again, logic and reason have
long since left town in patent land
in the U.S.
For example Apple's big win against Samsung in part came thanks to a pair of patents that were equally ridiculous, if not more so. One patent was a design patent covering a
broad array of smartphone shapes
(rectangular with curved edges), while a second was the so-called "rubber-band" patent, which granted Apple exclusively rights to have its graphical user interface mirror a kind of commonly occurring natural phenomena (a transient effect). That would be like if you patented making a graphical element move in a spiral.
In addition to the messaging patent, Motorola also is claiming iOS and OS X infringe on several other patents --
U.S. Patent No. 5,883,580
(COVERS: geo-tagging and time-stamping messages FILED: 1997 GRANTED: 1999);
U.S. Patent No. 6,493,673
(COVERS: markup language for user messages and input FILED: 2000 GRANTED: 2002);
U.S. Patent No. 5,922,047
(COVERS: processing control signals from multimedia/telephony apps FILED: 1996 GRANTED: 1999);
U.S. Patent No. 6,425,002
(COVERS: interapplication message passing FILED: 1998 GRANTED: 2002);
U.S. Patent No. 7,007,064
(COVERS: memory management for wireless communications FILED: 2002 GRANTED: 2006); and
U.S. Patent No. 7,383,983
(COVERS: pausing messaging content FILED: 2005 GRANTED: 2008).
Nearly all of Motorola's current claims is built around broad messaging patents.
[Image Source: Scribd]
If you see a central theme it's because there is one -- basically Motorola has patents that cover virtually every single aspect of wireless messaging and it's looking to use that non-FRAND portfolio to punish Apple.
If Apple can win on such confounding patents, it would not surprise for Google-Motorola to potentially score a similar logic-defying win, assuming luck is in their favor at their day in court.
to investigate the claim against Apple, so the filings are now on the public record and win, lose, or draw Motorola will at least have its day in court.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
The real question is...
9/21/2012 11:25:13 AM
Why did Apple start this patent-trolling/ban hammer war to begin with? If their products are so superior (as their customers and iSheep seem to believe), why does the world's #1 tech company feel the need to ban their competitor's products instead of competing with them? Simple: They fear the same thing that happened to them back in the 80s within the Desktop PC space. This is why they'd rather ban and monopolize than risk going against the competition.
RE: The real question is...
9/21/2012 12:21:45 PM
Begun the Jobs War have.
RE: The real question is...
9/21/2012 12:34:26 PM
Apple feels deja vu. They see Android's market share growing while iOS' remains the same. They see that the majority of customers are choosing an open-platform as opposed to their own closed/restricted iOS.
They've seen this happen before with Windows vs Mac. They know how this ends. They refuse to let it happen again, that's why they're throwing down the ban hammer.
A company that tries to stifle innovation, competition and comsumer choice. Sadly, this is what Apple has become.
"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Google Seeks to Ban Almost Apple's Entire U.S. Product Line
August 21, 2012, 4:50 PM
Samsung Product Chief Takes Issue With Apple "Owning" the Rectangle
July 31, 2012, 1:03 PM
U.S. Patent System is Broken, Declares Judge in Android v. Apple Cases
July 6, 2012, 1:12 PM
China Labor Watch Releases Poor Report on Apple Supplier's Working Conditions in China
June 29, 2012, 2:05 AM
Quick Note: Google Chromebooks Now Coming with 1TB of Google Drive Space
November 21, 2014, 1:20 PM
Xiaomi Aims to be #1 Smartphone OEM Within 10 Years, Apple Urges Caution
November 21, 2014, 9:33 AM
Quick Note: Samsung's Request to Dismiss Microsoft Lawsuit is Rejected
November 20, 2014, 12:53 PM
Amazon Offers "The Washington Post" Free for Six Months to Kindle Fire Owners
November 20, 2014, 7:41 AM
Apple Watch Screen Resolution, App Limitations are Laid Bare by Developer Kit
November 19, 2014, 11:31 PM
Apple Replaces “FREE” Label with “GET” on App Downloads in iTunes App Store
November 19, 2014, 5:38 PM
Most Popular Articles
Wal-Mart: Miss Thanksgiving, Get Xbox One + Master Chief Collection for $299
November 17, 2014, 9:40 PM
Sweden Mulls Labelling "Sexist" Video Games in the Wake of Gamergate
November 17, 2014, 2:00 PM
Nokia Lumia 635 LTE Windows Phone is Only $40 at Best Buy on Black Friday
November 18, 2014, 11:59 AM
It's Official: Twitter is Profitable "Junk"
November 16, 2014, 10:45 PM
Apple Releases OS X 10.10.1 Yosemite, iOS 8.1.1 Updates
November 17, 2014, 1:43 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information