Tech Executives Agree U.S. Copyright Law is Making a Horrible Mess
September 17, 2012 3:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
30 CEOs and other top executives in a new report sound off about how nonsensical copyright law is progress
Whether you're a college student, an engineer, or an executive in charge of a huge tech company, there's a growing consensus that U.S. patent and copyright law is badly out of touch with reality.
law school professor
, published in the
University of Wisconsin Law Review
, saw the lawyer detail 30 interviews with CEOs and other high-level executives in the tech industry. It found overwhelming evidence that content holders have created a messy state of affairs for U.S. copyright law; a mess which is both stymying technology, and hurting the content holders themselves.
I. Consensus: Copyright Law in the U.S. is Out of Control
, "Many innovators working on revolutionary technologies and many venture capitalists told me that copyright law has harmed innovation in the music industry. [I]ndustry leaders made clear to me that there are numerous innovations that failed to reach the market because of copyright laws"
He sees companies like Napster --which started on the principle of a radical new technology, but eventually fell under a flurry of litigation from the music industry -- as a failed opportunity for both parties. He comments that "a lot of innovators were scared away from trying to work with the record labels."
The DMCA and other punitive laws have plagued the tech industry.
[Image Source: Error Access Denied]
After the lawsuits, Napster flipped hands
before eventually winding up -- in greatly diminished form -- as a property of current owner Rhapsody.
II. Win-Win Services Delayed by Legal Mess
The author blames punitive litigation for delaying services like Pandora Media Inc.'s (
) and Spotify's internet radio offerings.
In their rush to fight the future content creators stifled win-win technologies like internet radio.
[Image Source: Pandora]
On the topic of
Orwellian "Stop Online Piracy Act"
) in the House and "PROTECT IP Act" (PIPA) (
) in the Senate, he writes, "The laws presented examples of copyright holders trying to expand the law to protect themselves at the expense of everybody else. We saw that the technology and internet communities have muscles to flex. Innovation needs to be part of the equation. I wrote this article to help put innovation at the forefront of the debate."
Indeed, the government is now having to answer tough questions regarding the abuse of the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
(DMCA) [PDF] (see
of the U.S. Code) to take down multiple legitimate sites at the request of the
Recording Industry Association of America
The message seems clear -- by pushing punitive legislation like the DMCA, SOPA, and PIPA; and by supporting equally punitive/nonsensical lawsuits against individual file-sharers
seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages
-- content holders are hurting their own opportunity to profit by trying to fight technological progress.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Copyright Law is a recent phenomenon...NOT (credit to Borat)
9/19/2012 9:57:51 AM
The writer comes off as writing as though copyright is a recent phenomenon, even of the 20th century, when in fact it isn't. It's been around as long as our constitution has. Copyright is crucial to many artists. It's insurance that their hard work and source of income won't be stolen from them. Many people might think its only whether Britney Spears can choose between a Gulfstream IV and a Gulfstream V, but in reality, copyright royalties can be the source of a meal or the ability to pay rent for a month for many struggling artists.
And since its been around for so long, that means that the law needs to be modified from time to time. Though many think of it most notably happening when VHS and Betamax came out, it also means it should be codified for the internet.
"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser
U.S. Federal Court: $675,000 Fine to Grad Student Pirate's 30 Songs is "Fair"
August 24, 2012, 8:08 PM
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: U.S. House Proposes Internet Inquisition, Pt. I
November 16, 2011, 6:50 PM
Napster Relaunches, Again
May 18, 2009, 11:33 AM
Best Buy to Purchase Napster
September 15, 2008, 2:57 PM
Google Knocked by Analysts, But Shows Strokes of Brilliance in Q1 2014
April 18, 2014, 2:33 PM
Google Street View and reCAPTCHA Get Smarter with New Algorithm
April 17, 2014, 9:02 AM
Mt. Gox CEO Refuses to Come to the U.S. in Financial Crimes Probe
April 16, 2014, 3:50 PM
Mark Zuckerberg: Facebook Home Reception Slower than Expected, Social Graph Will Pick Up
April 16, 2014, 2:00 PM
FBI's Facial Recognition Database to Have 52 Million Criminal, Non-Criminal Photos by 2015
April 15, 2014, 2:56 PM
Microsoft's Anti-Google "Scroogled" Campaign May Have Ended
April 15, 2014, 2:44 PM
Most Popular Articles
A Bug's Life: Female Cave Bugs Have Penises, Penetrate Males for Three Days
April 17, 2014, 7:20 PM
Quick Note: Toyota Attempts to Erase “Boring” Image with ’15 Camry SE Hybrid
April 16, 2014, 11:36 AM
Microsoft Announces the First Steps in Its "Universal Apps" Program
April 15, 2014, 7:59 PM
Project Moonshine: Google's Plan to Flatten Android App Icons Leaks
April 16, 2014, 1:46 PM
HTC Hires Former Samsung Marketing Chief Who Developed "Galaxy" Brand
April 18, 2014, 6:00 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information